![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oklahoma city
Posts: 490
|
utility bucket vs. real buckets
seems like the utility buckets are wider. but i checked em out and they are original what is better the utility with the metal backs or the plastic back seats? i really dont know but i can get either one for a good price so would like to know what you guys think
should i go with regular plastic backs or the utility metal backs? thanks |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Registered User
![]() Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Poplar Bluff, MO
Posts: 1,502
|
Re: utility bucket vs. real buckets
Depends on what you are doing. If you need to recover either set, the utility buckets do not have the upolstery repopped whereas the smaller plastic back buckets do have the recover materials ready made, look in LMC or Classic industries. You can get the utilities covered but it will be more of a job someone will have to custom.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
SKINNY TIRES RULE!
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Bothell, WA
Posts: 11,038
|
Re: utility bucket vs. real buckets
Also, you can't fit the metal backs from utility buckets on the standard buckets. The shapes are different.
__________________
bouncytruck 1972 K5 The Hauler 1994 K1500 Suburban The Daily2010 Kia Soul Wife's Ride2014 Fiat 500L |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
Senior Member
![]() Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Murray, Kentucky
Posts: 3,649
|
Re: utility bucket vs. real buckets
Utilities are kind of squared off, and are more comfortable for bigger guys. The others are more "sporty"
I have utilities, but I'd rather have the other. Rg
__________________
Roger '68 Short step - https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=849675 '69 ('70?) 2wd Blazer - https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=856475 '70 GMC Jimmy 2wd '73 Firebird - https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=853203 Ideas - https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=851743 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 | |
PITbut
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: monroe washington
Posts: 3,055
|
Re: utility bucket vs. real buckets
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]() Third time is the charm. ![]() Last edited by lyrikz; 07-08-2008 at 11:50 PM. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
Special Order
![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
|
Re: utility bucket vs. real buckets
Utility buckets are real.The other ones are more comfoetable,IMO.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oklahoma city
Posts: 490
|
Re: utility bucket vs. real buckets
so i am getting mostly that the utilitys are the less desireable of the two. good to know. looks like i am going to go with the original buckets then instead thanks. if anyone else has an opinion against it then would love to hear it
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
I have a radical idea!
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
|
Re: utility bucket vs. real buckets
![]() ![]()
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435 ‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350 '69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT '69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435 '84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer 67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096 My trucks http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all Member of the 1-Ton Club! Last edited by 67_C-30; 07-09-2008 at 12:00 AM. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
Special Order
![]() ![]() Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,851
|
Re: utility bucket vs. real buckets
Ok,they are actually bench seats sawed in half with the middle tossed out.My bad.
![]() I think the utility whatchamacallits are alot like some of the 1st GM car buckets as far as shape goes.Just flat and square.I have a set and if I ever use them they will be used in a custom application.I mean,I`d have an upholsterer give a shape to the seating surfaces.They could be made to be more comfortable than their shapelier sisters with some custom foam work.There`s just no bolster to them.They seem to have a utility feel to them,ya think?When I was younger I never gave comfort a thought.I do now or when I don`t I sure feel it. It`s funny,when upholstery was first being reproduced for these trucks 15 or more years ago I was wanting covers for a Blazer.I was asking an "expert" dealer about getting them for a`72 with the basic upholstery.I wanted the CST covers and was asking if they`d work.I knew those were all that was offered but wasn`t sure if there were differences in the seat itself.He told me,"We only deal in the upscale seats".I told him these weren`t the utility seats,just the non-CST..."Nope!" was all he`d say.I never covered those seats thinking I`d have to get custom-made.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed" GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project) GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling) Tim "Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman" R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|