The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-19-2009, 08:36 PM   #1
CanonKid
Registered User
 
CanonKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 84
Front crossmember...

I know I've been posting a lot but I have another question. I have a front crossmember out of a 1971 Chevy truck and I was wondering if it would bolt up to a 1966 1/2 ton truck?
__________________
1966 C20
CanonKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 09:23 PM   #2
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,938
Re: Front crossmember...

Quote:
Originally Posted by CanonKid View Post
I know I've been posting a lot but I have another question. I have a front crossmember out of a 1971 Chevy truck and I was wondering if it would bolt up to a 1966 1/2 ton truck?
Yes. They're basically the same. What are you trying to accomplish?
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 09:28 PM   #3
CanonKid
Registered User
 
CanonKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 84
Re: Front crossmember...

I wanna put the front crossmember on so I can have disc brakes.
__________________
1966 C20
CanonKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 09:31 PM   #4
scotts62
One day...
 
scotts62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tuttle, Ok
Posts: 9,240
Re: Front crossmember...

That would do the trick for you then
Rebuild it and youll have a brand new front end with discs under it
__________________
Scott

93 crew cab build
Project 62
scotts62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 09:39 PM   #5
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,938
Re: Front crossmember...

Quote:
Originally Posted by CanonKid View Post
I wanna put the front crossmember on so I can have disc brakes.
You don't have to swap the entire crossmember for the discs unless you want to do the extra work. All the parts that attach to the crossmember can/will bolt up to the current c.member already in your 66.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 09:44 PM   #6
CanonKid
Registered User
 
CanonKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 84
Re: Front crossmember...

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
You don't have to swap the entire crossmember for the discs unless you want to do the extra work. All the parts that attach to the crossmember can/will bolt up to the current c.member already in your 66.
The crossmember under the truck has a cut in it. That makes me uncomfortable, and the other crossmember was free.
__________________
1966 C20

Last edited by CanonKid; 01-19-2009 at 09:44 PM.
CanonKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 10:02 PM   #7
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,938
Re: Front crossmember...

Quote:
Originally Posted by CanonKid View Post
The crossmember under the truck has a cut in it. That makes me uncomfortable, and the other crossmember was free.
Ahh. Good reason for a swap then.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 10:42 PM   #8
CanonKid
Registered User
 
CanonKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 84
Re: Front crossmember...

I don't know if the cut in the crossmember compromised the structural integrity or not but I'd rather not risk it.
__________________
1966 C20
CanonKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 11:07 PM   #9
scotts62
One day...
 
scotts62's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Tuttle, Ok
Posts: 9,240
Re: Front crossmember...

Quote:
Originally Posted by CanonKid View Post
I don't know if the cut in the crossmember compromised the structural integrity or not but I'd rather not risk it.
Yeah i dont blame you there.
__________________
Scott

93 crew cab build
Project 62
scotts62 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2009, 11:11 PM   #10
CanonKid
Registered User
 
CanonKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 84
Re: Front crossmember...

Well I'm glad people agree with me.
__________________
1966 C20
CanonKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2009, 12:36 AM   #11
TwoFiftyShifter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Gwinnett GA
Posts: 1,803
Re: Front crossmember...

I agree with you kid. Better safe then sorry. Structural integrity is a nice way of putting it.
__________________
1982 K10 SWB
1987 V20 - Sold - Doh!
TwoFiftyShifter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2009, 12:43 AM   #12
CanonKid
Registered User
 
CanonKid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Tucson, Arizona
Posts: 84
Re: Front crossmember...

Quote:
Originally Posted by TwoFiftyShifter View Post
I agree with you kid. Better safe then sorry. Structural integrity is a nice way of putting it.
Couldn't agree with you more.
__________________
1966 C20
CanonKid is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com