The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-19-2009, 09:40 PM   #1
ksjh1316
Account Suspended
 
ksjh1316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 1,599
could this be true?

I was talking with my body man regarding my engine and he was telling me that by switching to some vortec heads he had from my smogger 882's I could bump from 195 horse to around 295. Is this realistic I know heads give a boost on a stock motor but that much?
ksjh1316 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 09:58 PM   #2
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
Re: could this be true?

don't hold your breath.
They are great heads... but I highly doubt ANY head swap will net you 100 horses without anything else being swapped out.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 10:04 PM   #3
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: could this be true?

No, that's not really accurate. Vortecs can add easily add 30 - 40 HP. The problem that some people have is the math used to get their numbers. The fact is that a set on a Vortecs on a healthy 350 can easily (and usually will if tuned properly) make 300 GROSS HP (gross flywheel HP). Some people see or hear that number and say "Wow, that'll make my factory rated 195 HP 350 gain over 100 HP". The problem is that the factory rating is NET HP, and in terms of gross HP numbers that 195 HP 350 is actually closer to 210 - 220 GROSS HP. In terms of NET HP, the Vortec headed 350 is closer to 250-260 NET HP.
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 10:06 PM   #4
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: could this be true?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Longhorn Man View Post
don't hold your breath.
They are great heads... but I highly doubt ANY head swap will net you 100 horses without anything else being swapped out.
Exactly. You can bolt a set of 15 degree 240 cc race heads on your engine, and you won't see a 100 HP gain if nothing else is changed. The 35 - 40 HP gain that Vortecs will get you is a very respectable gain, and well worth the swap.
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 10:08 PM   #5
Skirkpat
Registered User
 
Skirkpat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: K.C. Missouri
Posts: 1,024
Re: could this be true?

I agree with Longhorn 100 horses is alot , but the built Vortec engines will make 400 horse pretty easy, 300 seems very doable even with a stock 350.You make almost all power in the heads, they are the most imortant performance part on the engine. Either way you will see a marked improvement, and it will only help any other mods down the line. You Should DOIT!

Last edited by Skirkpat; 02-19-2009 at 10:09 PM.
Skirkpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 10:12 PM   #6
allen123
It'll buff out
 
allen123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Blanchard,Ok
Posts: 1,376
Re: could this be true?

SO what all will the vortec heads do for it like whats differant about them, sorry for such a dumb question but i've really wanted to know becuase i have to get a new head and im thinking about getting some vortecs
__________________
1972 Chevy c10 swb
2008 CBR600RR Grafitti edition

My Build
Cody Allen
allen123 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 10:13 PM   #7
Skirkpat
Registered User
 
Skirkpat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: K.C. Missouri
Posts: 1,024
Re: could this be true?

Part of the problem is that you are talking to a body guy about engines,tell him to be careful around the paint fumes!!! LOL (just a joke, most of the body guys I know are true rodders)
Skirkpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 10:20 PM   #8
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: could this be true?

Quote:
Originally Posted by allen123 View Post
SO what all will the vortec heads do for it like whats differant about them, sorry for such a dumb question but i've really wanted to know becuase i have to get a new head and im thinking about getting some vortecs
They flow better which will make more HP and they have a revised fast-burn, high-swirl style combustion chamber that allows for more complete burn of the mixture with creates more power (and torque) and better efficiency. The spark plug is indexed closer to the center of the cylinder, and this chamber design allows for a little higher compression ratio to run before detonation compared to older SBC heads. They are basically the latest and greatest Gen I head that has the advantage of computer-aided design and 40+ years of research and development on the old SBC. They are just technologically more advanced than any of the older heads.
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!

Last edited by 67_C-30; 02-19-2009 at 10:22 PM.
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 10:31 PM   #9
Sammy
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Bonne Terre, Mo
Posts: 3,005
Re: could this be true?

I believe you will also have to change the intake that will be an added expense for you in the swap.
__________________
'69 Chevy Long Fleet & '71 GMC Short Step & Project "ODD BALL"


"You can wash a pig, soak it in most expensive perfume. In the end it is still just a pig."

ODD BALL build thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=478629"
Sammy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 10:37 PM   #10
PHAT TONY
Registered User
 
PHAT TONY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Red Deer ab canada
Posts: 1,250
Re: could this be true?

Vortec heads flow VERY similar numbers to Edlebrock Performer RPM's, and the manifold holes are at a different angle. May help you reference....
PHAT TONY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 11:08 PM   #11
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: could this be true?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PHAT TONY View Post
Vortec heads flow VERY similar numbers to Edlebrock Performer RPM's, and the manifold holes are at a different angle. May help you reference....

Yes they do. In fact, they flow slightly better on intake side but a little less on the high lift range of the exhaust side, but still very comparable will make similiar numbers. Keep in mind that is a 1.94/1.50 valve Vortec flowing as good as and better than a lot of 2.02/1.60 performance heads. This is why the low lift numbers of the Vortec cannot be touched by the bigger heads, and why the Vortec produces so much low end torque. GM really hit the nail on the head with this design, and did even better on LS-X engines.
Attached Images
 
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!

Last edited by 67_C-30; 02-19-2009 at 11:08 PM.
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 11:11 PM   #12
pitt
69 GMC of DOOM
 
pitt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: herington, KS
Posts: 62
Re: could this be true?

look at some world castings sportsman2's slightly cheaper than the vortech heads. this is off the jegs website.;;

GM Performance 12464298 - GM Performance Parts Aluminum Vortec SBC Heads
809-12464298
# SB-Chevy Aluminum Vortec Cylinder Head210cc Intake Ports
# 62cc Combustion Chambers
# 2.000'' Int/1.550'' Exh Valves
# Assembled, Sold Individually

$639.99

# SB-Chevy Sportsman II Cast Iron Cylinder Head200cc Intake Ports
# 64cc Combustion Chambers
# 2.020'' Int/1.600'' Exh Valves
# 1.437'' Valve Springs, .600'' Max Lift for Solid/Hyd. Roller Cam
# Angle Plug
# Assembled, Sold Individually

More info on World Products 011150-2
$534.99
pitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 11:13 PM   #13
ksjh1316
Account Suspended
 
ksjh1316's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Wichita KS
Posts: 1,599
Re: could this be true?

Thanks for the quick response i thought he was a little high on his hp rating increase. I am planning on a new dual plane intake as well as maybe adding fuel injection. My body guy also builds drag 67-72 trucks and GTO's for fun he says this should run like a bat out of he!!
ksjh1316 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 11:15 PM   #14
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: could this be true?

Quote:
Originally Posted by pitt View Post
look at some world castings sportsman2's slightly cheaper than the vortech heads. this is off the jegs website.;;

GM Performance 12464298 - GM Performance Parts Aluminum Vortec SBC Heads
809-12464298
# SB-Chevy Aluminum Vortec Cylinder Head210cc Intake Ports
# 62cc Combustion Chambers
# 2.000'' Int/1.550'' Exh Valves
# Assembled, Sold Individually

$639.99

# SB-Chevy Sportsman II Cast Iron Cylinder Head200cc Intake Ports
# 64cc Combustion Chambers
# 2.020'' Int/1.600'' Exh Valves
# 1.437'' Valve Springs, .600'' Max Lift for Solid/Hyd. Roller Cam
# Angle Plug
# Assembled, Sold Individually

More info on World Products 011150-2
$534.99

You are comparing aftermarket aluminum Vortecs. You can buy a set of cast iron Vortecs for $620 from Scoggin-Dickey. You can also find them used all over the pplace for $200 - $300.
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!

Last edited by 67_C-30; 02-19-2009 at 11:19 PM.
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 11:23 PM   #15
67_C-30
I have a radical idea!
 
67_C-30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Sweet Home Alabama!
Posts: 6,513
Re: could this be true?

Quote:
Originally Posted by ksjh1316 View Post
Thanks for the quick response i thought he was a little high on his hp rating increase. I am planning on a new dual plane intake as well as maybe adding fuel injection. My body guy also builds drag 67-72 trucks and GTO's for fun he says this should run like a bat out of he!!
Like I said, he probably wasn't lying to you, its just that you're 195 HP factory engine really didn't make that little power, and when you factor net HP like the factory does, the Vortec headed won't quite make the advertised numbers. If the factory had never changed from gross to net numbers in 1972, this confusion would have been avoided.
__________________
'67 C-30 Dually Pickup 6.2 Turbo Diesel, NP435
‘72 C-10 SWB , 350 4bbl, TH350
'69 C-10 SWB , 250 L6, 3 OTT
'69 GMC C3500, dump truck, 351 V6, NP435
'84 M1009 CUCV Military Blazer

67 C-30 Turbodiesel build thread
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=254096

My trucks
http://s226.photobucket.com/albums/d...ediafilter=all

Member of the 1-Ton Club!
67_C-30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 11:26 PM   #16
pitt
69 GMC of DOOM
 
pitt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: herington, KS
Posts: 62
Re: could this be true?

yea its true...
pitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2009, 11:55 PM   #17
67/72junkie
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 1,129
Re: could this be true?

I put a set of vortecs on a 71 400 small block and have been super impressed.I have a friend who does machine work and he hooked me up on a set for $200 off a low mile motor that he picked up to use the bottom end in a customers truck.I have a built 400 with 186 casting LT1 heads 202 valves, roller rockers,550 lift comp cam the works .I have close to 5 grand invested in this motor and with race gas at the track it is awesome.To drive it on the steet I have to detune it and retard the timing.The stock 400 with vortecs and updated 151 grind 350 horse L79 cam performs awesome on 93 octane pump gas and I stuck it together for less than $1000 I have had alot of hi performance small blocks with lots of money invested and this has been the best bang for the buck.I would estimate it has around 350 to 375 hp.
67/72junkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 12:30 AM   #18
kelsfine69
18 Till I Die
 
kelsfine69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 1,522
Re: could this be true?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sammy View Post
I believe you will also have to change the intake that will be an added expense for you in the swap.
Can the Vortec heads be swaped out on the later TBI engines(87-95) without a intake swap?
__________________
2011 GMC Acadia
1969 GMC BBC LS7
2007 GMC Crew Duramax
1987 Camaro Iroc 350 Tuned Port Injection
42000Km

1987 Chevrolet Silverado 350 TBI
1987 Chevrolet Silverado 350 TBI(yes 2)

Take me drunk, I'm too home...
kelsfine69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 12:46 AM   #19
67/72junkie
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: NC
Posts: 1,129
Re: could this be true?

I 'm not positive but I don't think so.I purchased a new intake to go with mine. If I remember right I had a factory 87 model roller motor with center bolt valve covers and the intake off it would not work.
67/72junkie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 12:55 AM   #20
muddobber
muddobber
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: lavaca ar
Posts: 78
Re: could this be true?

vortec heads dont have the middle two bolts for the intake on each side(96-99). the earlier center bolt heads have the middle two bolts on the intake going straight down instead of angled(87-95) you can use old style intakes by reaming out the center holes to make them fit the newer style heads. i have done two engines this way this month and have had no problems
muddobber is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 01:37 AM   #21
kevncar
Active Member
 
kevncar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Atwater, CA
Posts: 259
Re: could this be true?

It's been a long time since I read anything about these, but if I recall, the intake must be changed and the valve covers are centerbolt valve covers. Other than that, everything should be good. I think there was something about upgrading the valve springs too.
__________________
Kevin

72 Chevelle

67 C10...454/TH400
Build Thread:http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=193961
kevncar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-20-2009, 02:50 PM   #22
70rs/ss
Registered User
 
70rs/ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Northern AZ
Posts: 7,271
Re: could this be true?

For the $600 new, you cannot touch them, the Edelbrocks are a grand, so why spend $400 more to get a head that performs less or equal to a $600 set?? The intake thing is a super easy trade off to me!! If you use them look at a bigger cam (under .480 lift), but that is still pretty big compared to the oe cam in your 195 hp engine, a set of headers and you could easily add 100hp! They are the new "cheap" speed part revolution!
70rs/ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com