The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-24-2009, 09:41 PM   #1
rscam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Monroe,Georgia
Posts: 313
Disappointing MPG.

I have a 69 GMC stepper. It has a 355 with roughly 300hp with an Edelbrock 600 carb. I have an NV3500 with 3.08 rear gears and 28 inch tires. 60 mph is a cool 1600 rpms and it doesn't struggle to maintain that speed. I just got my speedo working so I checked my mileage and got a disappointing 12.25 MPG. I drove the truck very easy and didn't get the truck over 2200 rpm when shifting. I was hoping for 14-15. Can I tune the Edelbrock for better mileage? I just put it on straight from the box and really only adjusted the air mixture and idle.
rscam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2009, 09:43 PM   #2
kgt
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 147
Re: Disappointing MPG.

ditch the carb and install a rochester q-jet, the smaller primarys will help.
kgt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2009, 09:50 PM   #3
71swb4x4
Senior Member
 
71swb4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brookings, SD
Posts: 10,497
Re: Disappointing MPG.

Was that 12.5 city or highway? How many times have you checked the mileage? Variouis everyday driving conditions will affect your mpg's. Don't get discouraged until you have checked that rating for a few tanks.
__________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't good for anything, but you can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs.

Last edited by 71swb4x4; 04-24-2009 at 09:50 PM.
71swb4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2009, 09:57 PM   #4
70cst
Senior Member
 
70cst's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: New Madison, Ohio
Posts: 21,365
Re: Disappointing MPG.

Be glad you don't have a BB...10mpg regardless of what you do.
__________________
A husband can be right...or...A husband can be happy.

67-72 Chevy and GMC Trucks...The Classic Truck for the Classic Folk.

1970 CST Two tone green, 402BB, 400 Automatic, Tach, Buckets, AC, AM-FM, Tilt, GM CB, GM 8 Tract, LWB, etc

JOHN 17:3...The better side of "LIFE"


Remember: Everyday is a good day...Some are just gooder!
70cst is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2009, 10:02 PM   #5
jamesi20
Senior Member
 
jamesi20's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: NORTHEAST OHIO
Posts: 493
Re: Disappointing MPG.

My dear old dad (rest his soul) always told me the most honest people in the world will lie about 2 things...gas mileage and how long it takes them to get somewhere LOL I've owned a lot of chevy trucks and vans,with 2 barrels ,4barrels and 12 -14 m.p.g. is about all I could ever get out of them.I never owned one new enough to have fuel injection,but I imagine they do a bit better.
jamesi20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2009, 10:02 PM   #6
rscam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Monroe,Georgia
Posts: 313
Re: Disappointing MPG.

It was the first tank. It was country road driving with some small town mixed in. If that makes sense. No expressway and no stop and go traffic either. I would probably rank it as 40% city and 60% hwy. I am going to do some reading about edelbrocks and check the tire pressure. Its not my everyday driver. I have 2 other rice burners for MPG. Its more of a challenge for me now.
rscam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2009, 10:18 PM   #7
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
Re: Disappointing MPG.

try driving it in 4th and see if the MPG picks up. your RPMs are below optimum MPG range.
Low RPMs don't always mean better MPG. The engine doesn't have to actually struggle to maintian speed, to be under too much a load.
Poor aerodynamics, and an engine that was built with no regards to MPG (by todays standards) will make for poor MPG. To be honest, i am amazed you got as much as you did. These engines simply were not built/designed to cruise at that low an RPM with that kind of load.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2009, 10:23 PM   #8
Sinister
Between Trucks...
 
Sinister's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Los Angeles, CA.
Posts: 3,830
Re: Disappointing MPG.

I'd be happy with 12.25, I get 10 MPG with a bone stock 350.
__________________
Beat it to fit,
Paint it to match...
Sinister is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2009, 10:33 PM   #9
big_al_71
Registered User
 
big_al_71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: South Florida
Posts: 11,375
Re: Disappointing MPG.

If my truck ever gets 10 mpg I would be very happy.
__________________
Get your facts first, and then you can distort them as much as you please!!!!!.



Sylvester's build thread >>>http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...ht=big+rebuild
big_al_71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2009, 10:46 PM   #10
rscam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Monroe,Georgia
Posts: 313
Re: Disappointing MPG.

I just recently changed my 3.73 geared rear end for a 3.08 unit. The NV3500 has a 4.0something first gear and with the 3.73 It was a stump puller. I could easily start in 2nd gear. My reasoning was to change the rear axle to the 3.08 so I could use first gear and then have a highway gear. I will try running in 4th gear as you said Longhorn man. That will probably duplicate fairly close the 5th gear 3.73 combo I had. I am also going to check my timing and set the carb a little better that just out of the box.
rscam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2009, 11:08 PM   #11
cdowns
Senior Member
 
cdowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: daytonabeach
Posts: 22,956
Re: Disappointing MPG.

the speedometer works?? but is it correct???
__________________
71c-10 350/2004r/4:11 lowered3/4 longbed/dead by hurricane

MEANING OF DEATH::::: SOMEBODY ELSE GETS YOUR STUFF

DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK

TAKE MY ADVISE;I DON'T USE IT ANYWAY
cdowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2009, 11:13 PM   #12
Camper Power
Registered User
 
Camper Power's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Grande Prairie Alberta
Posts: 261
Re: Disappointing MPG.

that doesnt sound that bad, i probably get 10 with a 350, 27" tires and 4.11 rear end
__________________
eh

1970 Chevy C20 daily driver
1975 GMC Jimmy 4x4 project
1966 GMC C10 Dad's project
Camper Power is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2009, 11:30 PM   #13
rscam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Monroe,Georgia
Posts: 313
Re: Disappointing MPG.

I calibrated the speedo. It stays right on with the mile markers on the road. Thats as close as I can get it.
rscam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 12:05 AM   #14
clay68c10
Senior Member
 
clay68c10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Centennial, CO
Posts: 2,932
Re: Disappointing MPG.

You can try leaning out your primaries and see if it gives you any more mileage. Jet and rod swaps are SUPER easy on those carbs. Just follow the chart in the back of the book that came with it.
And get the calibration kit, it's only like $40 and you get all the stuff you'll ever use.
__________________
ClusterTruck: 68 C10 Bought in 89, wrecked in 03. Slow low $ rebuild started '17. 6.0 & TKO
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=788602
93 K1500 Short Step, 350, NV4500, EBL flash ECU. Vortec heads & roller cam someday...
05 Jeep Wrangler Unlimited. 3” lift & 6-speed
02 E320 the insurance total “free car”
13 Tahoe LTZ
clay68c10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 12:22 AM   #15
BIGJAKE97
Senior Member
 
BIGJAKE97's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: hayward, ca
Posts: 264
Re: Disappointing MPG.

can i ask, how did you get the speedo working? the nv3500 has a electric speedo? thanks, jake
__________________
67 short fleet
71 blazer 4x4
72 blazer 2wd
76 gmc sierra 3/4t 4x4
62 bel air
01 blazer extreme
member 11,943!
BIGJAKE97 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 12:29 AM   #16
Indyuke
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Lake Stevens, WA
Posts: 623
Re: Disappointing MPG.

I'd agree with longhorn man. You need to be turning at least 2000rpm at 60mph. At 2000-2500rpm the engine is more free reving and in it's proper cruising range with a higher manifold vac. As said before, a q-jet will take better advantage of this as well and give you better fuel economy.

I have a stock 350 with a q-jet, 700r4 and 3.73 gearing to keep the rpms about 2100 at 65, and I've never gotten below 14mpg. Not great, but about on par with my dad's new F250 with a 5.4L
Indyuke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 12:32 AM   #17
Bus Ted Knuckle
Son of a gun
 
Bus Ted Knuckle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Hot Springs, Arkansas
Posts: 1,636
Re: Disappointing MPG.

you need to install 3:73 gears, your rpm's are too low for good fuel mileage.
__________________
Bill

BEATERS ARE NEATER
Bus Ted Knuckle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 09:45 AM   #18
rscam
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Monroe,Georgia
Posts: 313
Re: Disappointing MPG.

I have an electronic speedometer. I just got it installed and working last week. I posted another thread with a picture of it. Its a VDO unit.
rscam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 09:58 AM   #19
68gmsee
Active Member
 
68gmsee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Centrally located between Houston, Austin and Waco. BCS area.
Posts: 7,947
Re: Disappointing MPG.

The first and only time I checked MPG on my worn, old 69 chevy was on a 250 mile trip I took some years ago. I got 14 MPG highway.

It has a 350 engine, 350 transmission, 3:08 rear end with a quadrajet.
68gmsee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-25-2009, 11:25 AM   #20
69RAT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: hopeless in Washington
Posts: 105
Re: Disappointing MPG.

Which vacuum port did you hook up on your carb? I changed from manifold to port side and went from 8-9 to 13+ highway (60-65) in a hilly area on my BB. I'm running 28" tires with a 410 and a TH400. I've got a 750 Edelbrock with a Performer intake. Changing this week to 3.42's hoping for 15 +/-.
__________________
'69 Chevy CST#'s 396/TH400, A/C
69RAT is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com