The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-05-2009, 03:12 PM   #1
jimmybeus
Registered User
 
jimmybeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: La Barge Wyoming
Posts: 63
'88 350 tbi.

I have a 1988 350 tbi with a 5 speed behind it. My question is I am going to rebuild it with the help of a buddy and he thinks to throw on a carb and manifold and do away with the fuel injection headache. Is that even possible? I have tried to find something on here about it but the main thing I see is going from carb to fuel injection. That was my first plan but now Im not quite sure. Any advice or ideas would be appreciated. The truck is a '67 GMC with a 292 and a 4 speed. Thanks
jimmybeus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2009, 03:37 PM   #2
steelhorse
Senior Member
 
steelhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Franklinton NC
Posts: 1,309
Re: '88 350 tbi.

You would need to get an intake for a 87-95 from someone like edelbrock to put a carb on it.
steelhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2009, 03:37 PM   #3
Wideopenracing15
Registered User
 
Wideopenracing15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 299
Re: '88 350 tbi.

I'd definitely go to carb, fuel injection is great but the headache sucks.
Wideopenracing15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2009, 03:46 PM   #4
68gmsee
Active Member
 
68gmsee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Centrally located between Houston, Austin and Waco. BCS area.
Posts: 7,947
Re: '88 350 tbi.

Why does the TBI suck? I had thought about maybe going that route...

Seems to me that if it was that bad GM would have stayed with carburetion. I had a TBI olds that lasted over 230K before I got rid of it and never had a problem with injector portion. Sensors is a different story, now.
68gmsee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2009, 03:46 PM   #5
jimmybeus
Registered User
 
jimmybeus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: La Barge Wyoming
Posts: 63
Re: '88 350 tbi.

I was hoping there wouldnt be much to it. Will the transmission work as well? How about the motor mounts? Is there a good place to get mounts from a 292 to a 350? Thanks
jimmybeus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2009, 03:58 PM   #6
howard_m18
Registered User
 
howard_m18's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: clarkston,MI
Posts: 217
Re: '88 350 tbi.

My project is a 67 LWD that I have under projects. It has a 1988 350 TBI that we changed over to carb. Wasn't a big deal to convert over. It also has a 700R 4 speed auto / Overdrive in it. Here is the link to my build. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=355771
There is a pic. of the engine in it. Howard
__________________
1967 C10 LWB, painted 2010 MUSTANG GRABBER BLUE & finally got it on the road after sitting in garage for 10+ yrs. Howard in MI.

Last edited by howard_m18; 09-05-2009 at 04:01 PM.
howard_m18 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2009, 05:21 PM   #7
Wideopenracing15
Registered User
 
Wideopenracing15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 299
Re: '88 350 tbi.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 68gmsee View Post
Why does the TBI suck? I had thought about maybe going that route...

Seems to me that if it was that bad GM would have stayed with carburetion. I had a TBI olds that lasted over 230K before I got rid of it and never had a problem with injector portion. Sensors is a different story, now.
It is great. Just the headache of getting it to work sucks
Wideopenracing15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2009, 06:10 PM   #8
toms84ss
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Arizona
Posts: 121
Re: '88 350 tbi.

If you don't use the TBI set up I might be interested in it.
toms84ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2009, 06:26 PM   #9
Wideopenracing15
Registered User
 
Wideopenracing15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 299
Re: '88 350 tbi.

I am a fan of Carbs. Maybe because im just old school.
Wideopenracing15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2009, 06:50 PM   #10
68gmsee
Active Member
 
68gmsee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Centrally located between Houston, Austin and Waco. BCS area.
Posts: 7,947
Re: '88 350 tbi.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wideopenracing15 View Post
I am a fan of Carbs. Maybe because im just old school.
I'm definitely old school - in more ways than one - and I like the carbs because it's what I've always worked with. The reason I thought about TBI is there's one available and I thought gas mileage would improve over the Quadrajet on my 69 ---Maybe.
68gmsee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2009, 06:55 PM   #11
Wideopenracing15
Registered User
 
Wideopenracing15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Des Moines, IA
Posts: 299
Re: '88 350 tbi.

And more power. Possibly
Wideopenracing15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-05-2009, 07:49 PM   #12
Lugnut64052
Middle-aged Curmudgeon
 
Lugnut64052's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Independence, MO
Posts: 753
Re: '88 350 tbi.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 68gmsee View Post
Why does the TBI suck? I had thought about maybe going that route...
TBI doesn't suck at all. It's a simple, reliable, injection setup that worked very well on millions of GM cars and trucks from the late '80's to the mid 90's. 4-cylinder and 6-cylinder versions powered bazillions of granny sedans and chick cars through that period also.

Cold start in the winter time is great, driveability is excellent, and they get reasonable mileage. Given an equivalent amount of experience with TBI and with carbs, it's easier to diagnose, sort out and fix a TBI problem than a carb/ignition/tuning problem (in my opinion).

True, you can't build a 700 horse, fire-breathing engine with a TBI setup, but for basic daily-driver operation they're hard to beat.

True, there's not nearly as much "bling" or "wow" factor as with a chromed-up race engine, but to each his own. I enjoy a well-tuned Q-jet. Have on on my '72 at the moment, in fact. But basic TBI sure is nice . . . . .
__________________
Bret

Check out the site's Truck Tech FAQ.
Be a site supporter.
My more-or-less pathetic build thread.

Board members I've met:
------------------------------
Longhorn Man
Dieselwrencher
jholley
big mike71
Lugnut64052 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-06-2009, 03:06 AM   #13
unclewatts
70 Chevrolet=Obsession
 
unclewatts's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: nice ca
Posts: 1,067
Re: '88 350 tbi.

Funny, I'm just like a lot of us 67-72 owners out there who say "Gee I wish I had fuel injection" although I have also read in several past posts that some people have had trouble getting them to work properly. I wonder if a lot of the difficulty is more related to the quality of the FI kit used. I have also heard that some people have had real good luck with the Edlebrock kits. I'm sure that the skill of the installer would play a part in this too. The only gripe I have about aftermarket FI is it's so darn expensive. So I run my Quadrajet.
__________________


I'm Just like my truck. Old, Ugly and Grouchy. Except my truck starts easily in the morning and doesn't smoke!

IT'S NOT EASY BEING GREEN! -Kermit the frog

1970 Chevrolet C-10 Longbed Stepside :
350, Muncie M20, 3.08 GM corp. positraction Forest green exterior/light green interior(Where all my money goes)

1996 Toyota Corolla (Parts runner)
unclewatts is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:17 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com