The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > Welcome and Discussion > General Discussion

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-07-2009, 12:22 AM   #1
SactoJim
Registered User
 
SactoJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,970
Interesting Crash Test

Someone showed me this the other day and though it comes as no surprise, it's pretty interesting to see. Quite often we complain about how they just don't make em like they used to! Hard to argue with the safety engineering in newer vehicles......probably best to avoid any head-on collisions in these old trucks!


This other one is just for fun.......saw this awhile back and was amazed how well these little match box Smart Cars held up.....even though the driver wouldn't have been so lucky!

__________________
72 Cheyenne SWB Fleet
Nut & bolt frame off in progress...99.9999%
- supercharged 383
- 4 wheel discs
- relocated fuel tank
-

My Build Thread
SactoJim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 12:38 AM   #2
79gmcc15
Gettin It One Pice At A Time
 
79gmcc15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: everett, washington
Posts: 2,688
Re: Interesting Crash Test

it is cool. but just an fyi. this is about the 4th thread about this. you should check out http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=365336 to learn more.
__________________
RIP ELJAY

Work In Progress 1979 GMC C1500 Trailering Special.
Getting the truck done, one piece at a time.

“You can tell a lot about a fellow’s character by his way of eating jellybeans.”Ronald Reagan

“I don’t know the key to success but I know the key to failure is trying to please everybody.” Bill Cosby
79gmcc15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 12:39 AM   #3
Pont406
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: West Hills, California
Posts: 679
Re: Interesting Crash Test

I don't know maybe it's just me but what's that brown stuff? Rust? I think that bel air was a rust bucket.
Pont406 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 01:33 AM   #4
texanidiot25
Eat My Rust
 
texanidiot25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cypress, Texas
Posts: 3,362
Re: Interesting Crash Test

^ 50 years of dirt.

Sorry, this test was rigged knowing the GM X-Frame was weak in an off set crash. A ladder-frame car would do much better. This is just a glorified publicity stunt by the ever unscientific IIHS

Last edited by texanidiot25; 10-07-2009 at 01:35 AM.
texanidiot25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 03:01 AM   #5
purewhitemp5
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bear Delaware
Posts: 72
Re: Interesting Crash Test

I am just pissed because they destroyed a classic 59 chevy!! Why not a less desirable Ford edsel.
purewhitemp5 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 07:18 AM   #6
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,858
Re: Interesting Crash Test

4th thread,not 67-72 truck related,no new comment,moving to general discussion.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 10:43 AM   #7
SactoJim
Registered User
 
SactoJim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 1,970
Re: Interesting Crash Test

Hell......looks like I need to use the "Search" function more often so I don't post repetitive things....Duh!

Wrong forum.....I figured, but it's just where I hang out!
__________________
72 Cheyenne SWB Fleet
Nut & bolt frame off in progress...99.9999%
- supercharged 383
- 4 wheel discs
- relocated fuel tank
-

My Build Thread
SactoJim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 02:46 PM   #8
El Jay
Gone to greener pastures
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Gateway to the Delta
Posts: 7,354
Re: Interesting Crash Test

Quote:
Originally Posted by purewhitemp5 View Post
I am just pissed because they destroyed a classic 59 chevy!! Why not a less desirable Ford edsel.
And I get an"AMEN", Brother??
__________________
'69 Chevy 1/2 T LWB Stepper: Daily Beater
'72 GMC 3/4 T Fleet: Another Daily Beater
'72 Plymouth Gran Coupe: ?


"Ah women. They make the highs higher and the lows more frequent." Friedrich Nietzsche

"Never kick a fresh turd on a hot day." Harry S. Truman

GUN CONTROL: Never having to say, "I missed you."

Always fire two warning shots into your attacker's chest area before putting a bullet between his eyes. Paraphrased from Louis Awerbuck
El Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 04:51 PM   #9
rambler
MOVE OVER
 
rambler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Warrensburg, MO
Posts: 5,470
Re: Interesting Crash Test

Quote:
Originally Posted by texanidiot25 View Post
^ 50 years of dirt.

Sorry, this test was rigged knowing the GM X-Frame was weak in an off set crash. A ladder-frame car would do much better. This is just a glorified publicity stunt by the ever unscientific IIHS
I have read all the other posts, and was sick of seeing them destroy one of my favorite cars...

but what you said, is making sense... I was wondering why they had the collision occur that way......

interesting...
__________________
No matter where you are..... There you are...
Buckaroo Banzi
rambler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2009, 11:47 PM   #10
americanmusc1e
Senior Member
 
americanmusc1e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,079
Re: Interesting Crash Test

Quote:
Originally Posted by texanidiot25 View Post
^ 50 years of dirt.

Sorry, this test was rigged knowing the GM X-Frame was weak in an off set crash. A ladder-frame car would do much better. This is just a glorified publicity stunt by the ever unscientific IIHS
yeah, I figured the video was pretty rigged, thanks for the official explanation on how they did it

I saw the smart car crash too, it's like throwing a styrofoam cup against a brick wall, the cup doesn't get damaged much
but, what happens when a smart car gets sandwiched between two vehicles??????? back to the styrofoam cup analogy.
__________________
-- Josh

Instagram: @americanmusc1e

OLD SKOOL-- 1970 C10. 454/Th400/3.07 posi Build Thread
FARM TRUCK----1949 Chevrolet 3800 Power Wagon Hauler Build Thread

1999 4wd OBS Tahoe - daily.

DM me if you can't see photos i posted

Last edited by americanmusc1e; 10-07-2009 at 11:48 PM.
americanmusc1e is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 12:35 AM   #11
texanidiot25
Eat My Rust
 
texanidiot25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cypress, Texas
Posts: 3,362
Re: Interesting Crash Test

The frame is designed to flex over bumps, so knowing this, they knew it would give way easy in a wreck, leaving just some sheet metal and thin a-pillars to stop a car. Which of course, didn't.

Not to mention the IIHS has little to do with many safety innovations over the years. They just like to act like they do things. Mind you, it's ran by the insurance companies.
texanidiot25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 01:16 AM   #12
Tater
Cradle Robber
 
Tater's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Lily Lake,Illinois
Posts: 774
Re: Interesting Crash Test

Why do people have such a hard time admitting that new cars are safer?I'll be first to admit that old cars are way cooler,but if I had to choose between an old car and a new car in a head on collision,I'd take my chances in a new car.
__________________
"The problem with the world is that everyone is a few drinks behind." Humphrey Bogart

"Hippies.They're everywhere.They wanna save the earth,but all they do is smoke pot and smell bad."Eric Cartman

"Think about how stupid the average person is,and realize half of them are stupider than that."George Carlin
Tater is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2009, 01:42 AM   #13
texanidiot25
Eat My Rust
 
texanidiot25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Cypress, Texas
Posts: 3,362
Re: Interesting Crash Test

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tater View Post
Why do people have such a hard time admitting that new cars are safer?I'll be first to admit that old cars are way cooler,but if I had to choose between an old car and a new car in a head on collision,I'd take my chances in a new car.
Because the test was stupid and utterly irrelevant. A waste of a good surviving car. Of course a car that's designed to be safe is safer. The old Bel Air wasn't built with safety in mind.
texanidiot25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com