01-04-2010, 09:59 PM | #1 |
Addicted to Rust
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Abbeville SC
Posts: 1,030
|
Something to chew on
I have read a couple of threads on fitting later style wheels on 60-87 trucks. It seems that the major problem is the hub protrudes too far for the wheel center. I wonder how hard it would be to fabricate a spindle to use the 99 up hub in the earlier chassis? You would need some bungs to bore for the ball joint tapers and the tie rod. A large bung that would be machined for the hub assembly and some plate. A jig would have to be fabricated to locate the steering and ball joints. Just some thing to think about. Jay
__________________
Current trucks: (48 GMC100 320 inliner) Gone (48 Suburban in pieces) Sold 87 GMC CCSB 5.3 4l60E Daily Driver ECTA National record holder XO/PP We never really grow up, we just learn how to act in public. |
01-07-2010, 07:33 PM | #2 |
Happy to be here
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,021
|
Re: Something to chew on
I see a couple of holes in your free thinking. All the late model wheels are 6 lug. That would work out for 60-71 trucks, but create a need to convert the rear axle on 72-87's.
The second concern with this would be backspace issues. Most of the later wheels have a BS that is not compatible with the earlier trucks.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com Articles- "Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab "Elwood" the77_Remix 85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett" "Refining Sierra" |
01-07-2010, 11:49 PM | #3 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,071
|
Re: Something to chew on
Quote:
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
01-08-2010, 12:40 AM | #4 |
Addicted to Rust
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Abbeville SC
Posts: 1,030
|
Re: Something to chew on
It would definately require some serious time measuring the back spacing. The rear would probably work with using the 99 up axle to make the spacing right. Just some thing that is rattling around my warped brain. Jay
__________________
Current trucks: (48 GMC100 320 inliner) Gone (48 Suburban in pieces) Sold 87 GMC CCSB 5.3 4l60E Daily Driver ECTA National record holder XO/PP We never really grow up, we just learn how to act in public. |
01-09-2010, 02:12 AM | #5 |
Factory Strippers Rule!
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Shingle Springs, CA
Posts: 707
|
Re: Something to chew on
I also thought about this. I think it would be cool if you could also adapt some big aftermarket brakes - there are A LOT more brake options for the newer trucks than for the old trucks. Seeing how popular 6 lug disc conversions are for old trucks, I would think there is a market for this. And, the offset wheels for newer trucks are kinda cool looking...
__________________
"Feast your eyes on a feast of smoke." 67 Chevy Short Fleet PLAN: LQ9, 4L60, D60 Looking for School Bus Gauges - Help me out! |
Bookmarks |
|
|