The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-30-2010, 02:13 AM   #1
corymcrae
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Miles City Montana
Posts: 36
headers?

what long pipe headers can i buy for my '62 chevy c10 2wd?
corymcrae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 02:36 AM   #2
Captainfab
60-66 Nut

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Posts: 23,246
Re: headers?

Welcome to the forum

I'm assuming you are talking about headers for a small block? Which transmission does your truck have?

Since yours is a '62 you have to consider the torsion bars, which are an obsticle for the headers. I haven't installed headers in a '60-'62 so I can't say for sure which ones you could use. If you had a '63-'66 I know that you could use most headers for the '67-'87 trucks. These may work on the '60-'62's but I don't know for sure. I'm sure someone that has installed a set will chime in here soon.
__________________
Power Steering Box Adapter Plates For Sale HERE
Power Brake Booster Adapter Brackets For Sale '63-'66 HERE and '67-'72 HERE and '60-'62 HERE and "60-'62 with clutch HERE
Rear Disc Brake Brackets For Sale. Impala SS calipers HERE Camaro Calipers HERE D52 Calipers HERE 6 Lug HERE
Hydroboost Mounting Plates HERE
Captainfab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 03:40 AM   #3
corymcrae
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Miles City Montana
Posts: 36
Re: headers?

4 on the floor. lmc truck has a headman headers set and it says 283; 60 through 65 with out column shift manual transmission so i'm assuming it'll work but since the generator bracket bolts onto the stock exhaust manifold i don't know if i'll be able to bolt it on with long pipe headers.
corymcrae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 03:50 AM   #4
62 Bowtie
Registered User
 
62 Bowtie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Elk Grove Ca
Posts: 629
Re: headers?

I had a pair of long tube hooker hedders that fit with a lot of finessing. When I went to the muffler shop and he showed me how low the exaust was going to be because of the torsion bar crossmember I said forget it I'm now running Block huggers. I suppose if your gonna keep it stock height it will be ok or lifted.
62 Bowtie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 04:17 AM   #5
corymcrae
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Miles City Montana
Posts: 36
Re: headers?

well my pickup sits about 16 inches off the ground as it is. im thinking it might be a 1/2 ton with heavy duty suspension cause ive seen similiar pickups around town and they dont sit near as high as mine does stock.
corymcrae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 10:27 PM   #6
Rich 5150 69
Registered User
 
Rich 5150 69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Galt, Calif
Posts: 2,437
Re: headers?


These sit level with a th350 tans pan, sandersons`s full length tight tube...
__________________
`64 C10 vortec 350/350/373 posi
`69 RS/SS 350/350/308
`37 Ford 406/350/324 traclock
`68 Dart 370/904/323 suregrip
Rich 5150 69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2010, 10:42 PM   #7
72bigred
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Spokane WA
Posts: 254
Re: headers?

Actually just got done with this on a friends 60.. We battled over trying to use some long headers off a 67 that he has. We are down to the frame/no body and let me tell you.. Personally go with block hugger / shorty style, once we switched our thinking process and quit trying to save money using his long style the exhaust slapped in real quick and we were able to run the pipes between the frame/torsion bars and they dump by the rear tires. We were just running so low trying to get under the torsion bars it was well worth the money for the shorty's. My 2cents anyway.

Reid
72bigred is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2010, 03:25 AM   #8
corymcrae
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Miles City Montana
Posts: 36
Re: headers?

well whats the difference between shortys and long pipes i guess i never really knew the difference. and with shortys would i still be able to bolt on my generator bracket?
corymcrae is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2010, 10:24 AM   #9
1Bad62Pro/Street
"Where were you in '62?"
 
1Bad62Pro/Street's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Cleveland County, North Cackalacky
Posts: 5,013
Thumbs up Re: headers?

My personal preference is Hooker Headers. I like the sound they produce.
I have a set of 1970 Chevy Corvette - Competition - Black Full Length Hooker Headers on my truck now. Well they are in rust brown now.


( Header Basics )

You have probably heard words like: back pressure, scavenging, tuned length, merged collector, rotational firing order, compatible combination and many others that meant something, but how they relate to a header may be a little vague. This article should give you a basic understanding of how a header works, what the terminology means, and how it plays a part in the header's performance gains.

The first misconception that needs to be cleared up is that a header relieves backpressure, but a certain amount of backpressure is needed for optimum performance. Just the opposite is true. A good header not only relieves the backpressure, but goes one step further and creates a vacuum in the system. When the next cylinder's exhaust valve opens, the vacuum in the system pulls the exhaust out of the cylinder. This is what the term "Scavenging" means.

The first consideration is the proper tube diameter. Many people think "Bigger is Better", but this is not the case. The smallest diameter that will flow enough air to handle the engine's c.c. at your desired Red Line R.P.M. should be used. This small diameter will generate the velocity (air speed) needed to "Scavenge" at low R.P.M.s. If too small a diameter is used the engine will pull hard at low R.P.M.s but at some point in the higher R.P.M.s the tube will not be able to flow as much air as the engine is pumping out, and the engine will "sign off" early, not reaching its potential peak R.P.M. This situation would require going one size larger in tube diameter.

The second consideration is the proper tube length. The length directly controls the power band in the R.P.M. range. Longer tube lengths pull the torque down to a lower R.P.M. range. Shorter tubes move the power band up into a higher R.P.M. range. Engines that Red Line at 10,000 R.P.M. would need short tube lengths about 26" long. Engines that are torquers and Red Line at 5,500 R.P.M.s would need a tube length of 36". This is what is meant by the term "Tuned Length". The tube length is tuned to make the engine operate at a desired R.P.M. range.

The third consideration is the collector outlet diameter and extension length. This is where major differences occur between four cylinder engines and V-8 engines. The optimum situation is the four cylinder because of it's firing cycle. Every 180 degree of crankshaft rotation there is one exhaust pulse entering the collector. This is ideal timing because, as one pulse exits the collector, the next exhaust valve is opening and the vacuum created in the system pulls the exhaust from the cylinder. In this ideal 180 degree cycling the collector outlet diameter only needs to be 20% larger than the primary tube diameter. (Example: 1 3/4" primary tubes need a 2" collector outlet diameter.) The rule of thumb here is two tube sizes. This keeps the velocity fast to increase scavenging, especially at lower R.P.M.s. Going to a larger outlet diameter will hurt the midrange and low R.P.M. torque.

The amount of straight in the collector extension can move the engines torque up or down in the R.P.M. range. Longer extension length will pull the torque down into the midrange.

Engines that "Red Line" at 10,000 R.P.M. would only need 2" of straight between the collector and the megaphone. This is just enough length to straighten out the air flow before it enters the megaphone. This creates an orifice action that enhances exhaust velocity.

In the case of V-8 firing order, the five pulses fire alternately back and forth from left to right collector, giving the ideal 180 degree firing cycle. Then it fires two in succession into the left collector, then two in succession into the right collector. If the proper collector outlet diameter is being used (two sizes larger than primaries) the two pulses in succession load up the collector with more air than it can flow. This results in a very strong midrange torque, but causes the engine to "sign off" early, not reaching its potential peek R.P.M. The improper firing order on a V-8 engine results in the need to use large diameter collectors so the engine will perform well at high R.P.M.s. Unfortunately the large diameter collectors cause a tremendous drop in air velocity, resulting in less scavenging through the entire R.P.M. range.

Often cams are used with extended valve timing to help the exhaust cycling. This results in valve timing overlap (Intake and Exhaust valves both open at T.D.C.) which causes a "Reversion"cycle in the exhaust. When this happens, exhaust actually backs up into the cylinder causing intake air to be pushed back out the intake. This reversion causes "Standoff" (fuel blowing out of the Intake) at low R.P.M.s. This whole improper cycling has resulted in a number of "Cure Alls" to help stop this reversion and standoff.

The plentum intake was created to stop the fuel "Standoff". Then came "Anti Reversionary" Cones in the exhaust tubes, and stepped tube diameter in the header, extended collector lengths and even plentums in the exhaust tubes.

In this chain of events beginning with improper firing order, a series of cures has developed, each one causing a new problem.

The optimum cure to this whole problem is to correct the exhaust firing cycle. The two cylinders that fire in succession into each collector have to be separated. This can be done partially by a "Tri-Y" header, where the four primary tubes from each bank merge into two secondary tubes (separating the two pulses firing in succession) and finally collect into a single collector. This type of header helps, but the two pulses are still coming back together at the collector.

The second optimum cure is to cross the two center tubes from each bank, across the engine running them into the collector on the opposite side. This makes the firing cycle in each collector 180 degrees apart, the same as a four cylinder engine. Once this firing order is achieved, the small collector outlet diameter can be used and the "High Velocity Scavenging" at low R.P.M.s cures the reversion problems and eliminates the need for extreme cam duration.

This sounds so easy, you are probably asking why wasn't this done from the start?

If you have ever seen a set of 180 degree headers you would understand.

On today's cars, with space virtually nonexistent, crossing four tubes either under the oil pan or around the front or rear of the engine presents major problems. On racing applications where it is possible, there is still the problem of keeping the tube length down to a reasonable 32" long. If that's not enough challenge, then try to arrange the tubes into each collector so they fire in a "Rotational Firing" pattern. Then you have, what has been called "A Bundle of Snakes".

Arranging the tubes to fire rotationally adds to the scavenging capabilities. The exhaust gas exiting one tube, passing across the opening of the tube directly beside it, creates more suction on that tube than it would on a tube on the opposite side of the collector.

The next problem is "Turbulence" in the collector. When four round tubes are grouped together in a square pattern, so a collector can be attached, you notice a gapping hole in the center of the four tubes. The standard method in manufacturing headers is to cap this hole off with a square plate. This plate in the center of the four tubes creates dead air space, or turbulence, disrupting the high velocity in the collector. This problem is solved by using a "Merge Collector". This collector is formed from four tubes, cut at approximately an 8 degree angle on two sides. When the tubes are all fitted together they form a collector with a "Pyramid" in the center. This has eliminated the need for the square plate and has taken up some of the volume inside the collector, speeding up the air velocity.

Other methods of curing this problem are: fabricating a pyramid out of sheet metal and welding it over the hole between the tubes, or squaring the tubes on two sides so they fit together forming a "+" weld in the center eliminating the hole all together.

You can see that there are a great many factors that go into making a good header. When the header, intake system, and cam timing are all designed to operate to their maximum in the same R.P.M. range, then you have a "Compatible Combination". This combination can be tuned to deliver maximum power at any desired R.P.M. range.

These are some of the "Basics" you need to know about building or buying a good high performance header. There are many other adjustments that can be made to fine tune a header, but this should give you a basic understanding of how all the components work together.
__________________
PROJECT: "FULL METAL YELLOW JACKET"
1962 Chevy C-10 Stepside Shortbed Nostalgia Pro/Street Pickup Truck
PROJECT: "FULL METAL YELLOW JACKET Build Thread
What Are You Workin' On? - 1Bad62ChevyPickup
PROJECT: "TYRANNORAMBLER REX"
1969 AMC Rambler American Nostalgia Pro/Street
Youtube Channel: Father Son Projects
Youtube Channel: 2TIMOTHY2FITHTEEN

"North and South Carolina Folks Click Here!"
(((( ~ I have Parts For Sale & Miscellaneous Stuff ~ ))))

"Well being as there's no other place around the place,
I reckon this must be the place, I reckon...Nyuk Nyuk Nyuk" -Curly Howard Ph.D.
1Bad62Pro/Street is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2010, 08:51 PM   #10
rbkanco
Registered User
 
rbkanco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Montrose, co
Posts: 12
Re: headers?

Thanks 1BAD62Pro for the inf. A question along this line to you would be: On a 66 C10, we are pulling the 283 for a '73 350, adding Edelbrock carb and intake. We want dual flowmasters. What would be your recommendation for Headers? Short-long, brand? This is just a fun sunday driver we want to sound nice and squeal a little. Thanks for any insights.
rbkanco is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com