The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-09-2010, 12:06 AM   #1
smithja79
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Maple Valley, WA
Posts: 6
CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons

I am currently looking for a crew cab as well as the parts to convert it to short bed. My question is what is the best method to shorten it? I understand the methods that people have used and read the threads about them. Not looking for a "how-to", just wondering what the advantage is to going one way or the other. Basically is it best to splice in the back half of a 1/2 ton frame or 'Z' cut the 1-ton frame and remove 14"? Assuming that I am capable of doing either one, which would you choose and why? As I understand it, back-halving with the 1/2-ton frame (like OJOE did) allows you to line up bolt holes between the two frames and bolt together prior to welding. This seems like it might make it easier to get square. But, is it better to just cut a section out and retain the taller 1-ton frame for strength? Sorry for the long-winded question, but I've seen plenty about how to do each method, but not much regarding why one is preferred over the other. Thanks! -Jake
smithja79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 08:52 AM   #2
b454rat
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 3,461
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons

IMO it's easier to cut 14" out of the frame. But I don't have a welder or the place to do it, so I had to pay someone $150 to get it done. Took him not even a day to do it.
__________________
2000 GMC CCSB 454/4L80 6” lift SAS
1999 Chevy CCSB 454/NV4500 6” lift
1999 GMC Yukon 350/4L60 4" SAS
b454rat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 09:00 AM   #3
lolife99
67-72 parts collector,…
 
lolife99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,701
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons

Jake,...
I like OJOE's way of shortening with the 1/2 ton back half.

If you put a 1/2 ton rearend on the stock 3/4-ton/1-ton leaf springs,... You have to move the 1/2 ton rearend perches farther apart on the rearend.
(To work with the wider spacing of the heavier leaf springs).
I believe member bagged74 did this on his old crew cab.
If you're keeping the 8-lug rearend,... I would just shorten the original frame by 14".
__________________
Keith

Convert to disc brakes.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823
lolife99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 10:01 AM   #4
68 TT
Still plays with trucks
 
68 TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 3,556
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons

The overlapping sections method is by far the strongest way of doing it but the Z-method is not weak by any means. Both will hold up fine.

I like the simplicity and ease of alignment of the overlapping sections method.
__________________
miSSed opportunity - ground up creation of an AWD 1994 454 SS that never was http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=795577
69 C10 shortbed stepside 400 small block - built like what a super sport truck could have been
69 K20 lwb TBI 350 4L60E NP208 14-bolt Dana-44 w/disc
68 Camaro SS / RS 500hp 439 inch roller cam big block 4L80E
79 Malibu TPI 350 4L60 w/ Z28 steering & sway bars
68 TT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 11:30 AM   #5
smithja79
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Maple Valley, WA
Posts: 6
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons

Thanks for the replies.

Keith - I wasn't aware of the wider spacing on the 3/4-ton / 1-ton springs, thanks for pointing that out. Can you install 1/2-ton leaf springs on the 1-ton frame (with 1/2-ton rearend)? I assume they would still be spaced too far apart if using a 1/2-ton rearend, but just asking.
smithja79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 11:39 AM   #6
Pyrotechnic
Registered User
 
Pyrotechnic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,930
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...crew+cab+frame

There's a third method. Uses a 1/2 ton Suburban frame the rear half of a SWB frame. Pretty cool method and looks very factory.
__________________
1977 GMC Sierra Grande
Pyrotechnic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 11:46 AM   #7
ghettoluxury
Registered User
 
ghettoluxury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Waynesfield Ohio
Posts: 1,991
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons

I have made 3 shortbeds and tha Z method is the way I do it. No reason to spend extra cash for another frame when you are just going to cut it up anyway.
__________________

1949 Five Window, 1973 Step Side, 2000 Z71
ghettoluxury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 11:52 AM   #8
smithja79
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Maple Valley, WA
Posts: 6
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons

Ghetto - Makes sense to me, I was leaning toward the 'Z' method for the same reason; not wanting to spend more for another frame. What have you done as far as springs/rearend though? Just spread the perches on the rearend? Did you use 1/2-ton or the 1-ton springs? Thanks.
smithja79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 01:04 PM   #9
lolife99
67-72 parts collector,…
 
lolife99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,701
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons

Quote:
Originally Posted by smithja79 View Post
Thanks for the replies.

Keith - I wasn't aware of the wider spacing on the 3/4-ton / 1-ton springs, thanks for pointing that out. Can you install 1/2-ton leaf springs on the 1-ton frame (with 1/2-ton rearend)? I assume they would still be spaced too far apart if using a 1/2-ton rearend, but just asking.

I don't know what is wider,... the frame itself or just the hangers for the 3/4 leaf springs.
Maybe someone else will chime in.
__________________
Keith

Convert to disc brakes.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823
lolife99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 01:07 PM   #10
lolife99
67-72 parts collector,…
 
lolife99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,701
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons

Quote:
Originally Posted by ghettoluxury View Post
I have made 3 shortbeds and tha Z method is the way I do it. No reason to spend extra cash for another frame when you are just going to cut it up anyway.
The only reason I wanted the 1/2 ton rear frame rails is for extreme air ride drop components.
I wanted to be able to use a bolt in notch, or a bolt in rear suspension set up that is readily available for the 1/2 ton trucks.
(Porterbulit, KPComponents, RideTech, etc.)
Plus I had an extra frame.
If I keep my crewcab,... my '86 Dropmember truck will be donating its parts to the crew cab.
__________________
Keith

Convert to disc brakes.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823

Last edited by lolife99; 03-09-2010 at 01:28 PM.
lolife99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 01:08 PM   #11
68 TT
Still plays with trucks
 
68 TT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 3,556
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons

Quote:
Originally Posted by lolife99 View Post
I don't know what is wider,... the frame itself or just the hangers for the 3/4 leaf springs.
Maybe someone else will chime in.
I think it is in the hangers because the trucks all share the same 34" frame rail spacing.
__________________
miSSed opportunity - ground up creation of an AWD 1994 454 SS that never was http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=795577
69 C10 shortbed stepside 400 small block - built like what a super sport truck could have been
69 K20 lwb TBI 350 4L60E NP208 14-bolt Dana-44 w/disc
68 Camaro SS / RS 500hp 439 inch roller cam big block 4L80E
79 Malibu TPI 350 4L60 w/ Z28 steering & sway bars
68 TT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 03:32 PM   #12
Tow Me
Glen
 
Tow Me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Posts: 331
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pyrotechnic View Post
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...crew+cab+frame

There's a third method. Uses a 1/2 ton Suburban frame the rear half of a SWB frame. Pretty cool method and looks very factory.
It just depends what you are looking to do with your CCSB. Like Keith, I wanted to have half ton suspension for future air ride and the lowest stance possible. I'd like to go with a Porterbuilt crossmember as some point too. The method we used worked well since we were able to get a 2wd Suburban for free if we hauled it off and the truck frame we used for the back half was in a friend's field. I could have simply swapped out the 1/2 ton arms, spindles and brakes but having a 3/4 ton frame just bugged me. Extra bulk for no reason.

Ojoes method seems to be the easiest method.
__________________
Glen Simpson
Severed Ties - Oregon
Roseburg, Oregon
  • 1983 Chevrolet C10 - Ginger
    Photos

Past Trucks
Tow Me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2010, 04:10 PM   #13
ghettoluxury
Registered User
 
ghettoluxury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Waynesfield Ohio
Posts: 1,991
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons

Quote:
Originally Posted by smithja79 View Post
Ghetto - Makes sense to me, I was leaning toward the 'Z' method for the same reason; not wanting to spend more for another frame. What have you done as far as springs/rearend though? Just spread the perches on the rearend? Did you use 1/2-ton or the 1-ton springs? Thanks.
Are you going to use a 1/2-ton axle or keep the 1-ton?

If keeping the 1-ton than there is no need to change anything.

If you chose to go 1/2-ton or 3/4-ton than you will have to move the spring pads or use 1/2-ton hangers.

If you find a 3/4-ton crew than nothing has to be done to use a 1/2-ton axle due to the spring pads being the same width in 1/2 and 3/4.
__________________

1949 Five Window, 1973 Step Side, 2000 Z71

Last edited by ghettoluxury; 03-09-2010 at 04:15 PM.
ghettoluxury is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 02:13 AM   #14
smithja79
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Maple Valley, WA
Posts: 6
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons

Thanks for the input guys. I guess it will depend on what truck I find, but I've got my eye on a 1-ton dually crew right now. I would plan to convert it to 1/2 ton rearend, mainly for the wheel choices. So you're saying the hangers are likely interchangeable? So, I could potentially pull the 1/2-ton rearend AND hangers from a donor truck to swap onto the 1-ton frame? That's the route I'm leaning toward if it will work.
smithja79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 02:16 AM   #15
78swest
Registered User
 
78swest's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: aumsville oregon/afganistan
Posts: 89
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons

hey there is a 3/4 cc in turner oregon its a longbed 2wd its blue looks straight
78swest is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2010, 02:10 PM   #16
ghettoluxury
Registered User
 
ghettoluxury's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Waynesfield Ohio
Posts: 1,991
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons

yes the 1/2-ton hangers will bolt up to the 1-ton frame
__________________

1949 Five Window, 1973 Step Side, 2000 Z71
ghettoluxury is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com