Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
03-09-2010, 12:06 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Maple Valley, WA
Posts: 6
|
CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons
I am currently looking for a crew cab as well as the parts to convert it to short bed. My question is what is the best method to shorten it? I understand the methods that people have used and read the threads about them. Not looking for a "how-to", just wondering what the advantage is to going one way or the other. Basically is it best to splice in the back half of a 1/2 ton frame or 'Z' cut the 1-ton frame and remove 14"? Assuming that I am capable of doing either one, which would you choose and why? As I understand it, back-halving with the 1/2-ton frame (like OJOE did) allows you to line up bolt holes between the two frames and bolt together prior to welding. This seems like it might make it easier to get square. But, is it better to just cut a section out and retain the taller 1-ton frame for strength? Sorry for the long-winded question, but I've seen plenty about how to do each method, but not much regarding why one is preferred over the other. Thanks! -Jake
|
03-09-2010, 08:52 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 3,469
|
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons
IMO it's easier to cut 14" out of the frame. But I don't have a welder or the place to do it, so I had to pay someone $150 to get it done. Took him not even a day to do it.
__________________
2000 GMC CCSB 454/4L80 6” lift SAS 1999 Chevy CCSB 454/NV4500 4” SAS 1999 GMC Yukon 350/4L60 6" SAS |
03-09-2010, 09:00 AM | #3 |
67-72 parts collector,…
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,701
|
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons
Jake,...
I like OJOE's way of shortening with the 1/2 ton back half. If you put a 1/2 ton rearend on the stock 3/4-ton/1-ton leaf springs,... You have to move the 1/2 ton rearend perches farther apart on the rearend. (To work with the wider spacing of the heavier leaf springs). I believe member bagged74 did this on his old crew cab. If you're keeping the 8-lug rearend,... I would just shorten the original frame by 14".
__________________
Keith Convert to disc brakes. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823 |
03-09-2010, 10:01 AM | #4 |
Still plays with trucks
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 3,556
|
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons
The overlapping sections method is by far the strongest way of doing it but the Z-method is not weak by any means. Both will hold up fine.
I like the simplicity and ease of alignment of the overlapping sections method.
__________________
miSSed opportunity - ground up creation of an AWD 1994 454 SS that never was http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=795577 69 C10 shortbed stepside 400 small block - built like what a super sport truck could have been 69 K20 lwb TBI 350 4L60E NP208 14-bolt Dana-44 w/disc 68 Camaro SS / RS 500hp 439 inch roller cam big block 4L80E 79 Malibu TPI 350 4L60 w/ Z28 steering & sway bars |
03-09-2010, 11:30 AM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Maple Valley, WA
Posts: 6
|
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons
Thanks for the replies.
Keith - I wasn't aware of the wider spacing on the 3/4-ton / 1-ton springs, thanks for pointing that out. Can you install 1/2-ton leaf springs on the 1-ton frame (with 1/2-ton rearend)? I assume they would still be spaced too far apart if using a 1/2-ton rearend, but just asking. |
03-09-2010, 11:39 AM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 3,930
|
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...crew+cab+frame
There's a third method. Uses a 1/2 ton Suburban frame the rear half of a SWB frame. Pretty cool method and looks very factory.
__________________
1977 GMC Sierra Grande |
03-09-2010, 11:46 AM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Waynesfield Ohio
Posts: 1,991
|
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons
I have made 3 shortbeds and tha Z method is the way I do it. No reason to spend extra cash for another frame when you are just going to cut it up anyway.
__________________
1949 Five Window, 1973 Step Side, 2000 Z71 |
03-09-2010, 11:52 AM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Maple Valley, WA
Posts: 6
|
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons
Ghetto - Makes sense to me, I was leaning toward the 'Z' method for the same reason; not wanting to spend more for another frame. What have you done as far as springs/rearend though? Just spread the perches on the rearend? Did you use 1/2-ton or the 1-ton springs? Thanks.
|
03-09-2010, 01:04 PM | #9 | |
67-72 parts collector,…
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,701
|
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons
Quote:
I don't know what is wider,... the frame itself or just the hangers for the 3/4 leaf springs. Maybe someone else will chime in.
__________________
Keith Convert to disc brakes. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823 |
|
03-09-2010, 01:07 PM | #10 | |
67-72 parts collector,…
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,701
|
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons
Quote:
I wanted to be able to use a bolt in notch, or a bolt in rear suspension set up that is readily available for the 1/2 ton trucks. (Porterbulit, KPComponents, RideTech, etc.) Plus I had an extra frame. If I keep my crewcab,... my '86 Dropmember truck will be donating its parts to the crew cab.
__________________
Keith Convert to disc brakes. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823 Last edited by lolife99; 03-09-2010 at 01:28 PM. |
|
03-09-2010, 01:08 PM | #11 |
Still plays with trucks
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 3,556
|
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons
I think it is in the hangers because the trucks all share the same 34" frame rail spacing.
__________________
miSSed opportunity - ground up creation of an AWD 1994 454 SS that never was http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=795577 69 C10 shortbed stepside 400 small block - built like what a super sport truck could have been 69 K20 lwb TBI 350 4L60E NP208 14-bolt Dana-44 w/disc 68 Camaro SS / RS 500hp 439 inch roller cam big block 4L80E 79 Malibu TPI 350 4L60 w/ Z28 steering & sway bars |
03-09-2010, 03:32 PM | #12 | |
Glen
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Roseburg, Oregon
Posts: 331
|
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons
Quote:
Ojoes method seems to be the easiest method.
__________________
Glen Simpson Severed Ties - Oregon Roseburg, Oregon
Past Trucks
|
|
03-09-2010, 04:10 PM | #13 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Waynesfield Ohio
Posts: 1,991
|
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons
Quote:
If keeping the 1-ton than there is no need to change anything. If you chose to go 1/2-ton or 3/4-ton than you will have to move the spring pads or use 1/2-ton hangers. If you find a 3/4-ton crew than nothing has to be done to use a 1/2-ton axle due to the spring pads being the same width in 1/2 and 3/4.
__________________
1949 Five Window, 1973 Step Side, 2000 Z71 Last edited by ghettoluxury; 03-09-2010 at 04:15 PM. |
|
03-10-2010, 02:13 AM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Maple Valley, WA
Posts: 6
|
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons
Thanks for the input guys. I guess it will depend on what truck I find, but I've got my eye on a 1-ton dually crew right now. I would plan to convert it to 1/2 ton rearend, mainly for the wheel choices. So you're saying the hangers are likely interchangeable? So, I could potentially pull the 1/2-ton rearend AND hangers from a donor truck to swap onto the 1-ton frame? That's the route I'm leaning toward if it will work.
|
03-10-2010, 02:16 AM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: aumsville oregon/afganistan
Posts: 89
|
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons
hey there is a 3/4 cc in turner oregon its a longbed 2wd its blue looks straight
|
03-10-2010, 02:10 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Waynesfield Ohio
Posts: 1,991
|
Re: CCSB Conversion Method Pros & Cons
yes the 1/2-ton hangers will bolt up to the 1-ton frame
__________________
1949 Five Window, 1973 Step Side, 2000 Z71 |
Bookmarks |
|
|