The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-25-2010, 07:52 AM   #1
KEL
72 GMC
 
KEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wells, Maine
Posts: 534
TH350 vs 200R4

On the highway, what is the MPG and RMP difference
for each tranny running behind a stock 350 ?
Thanks
KEL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 07:52 AM   #2
KEL
72 GMC
 
KEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Wells, Maine
Posts: 534
Re: TH350 vs 200R4

that's "RPM", not "RMP" !
KEL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 08:14 AM   #3
cdowns
Senior Member
 
cdowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: daytonabeach
Posts: 22,956
Re: TH350 vs 200R4

the final drive ratio of a 2004R is 0.71// multiply your present RPM by 0.71 to get what the RPM will be. divide for mpg
__________________
71c-10 350/2004r/4:11 lowered3/4 longbed/dead by hurricane

MEANING OF DEATH::::: SOMEBODY ELSE GETS YOUR STUFF

DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK

TAKE MY ADVISE;I DON'T USE IT ANYWAY

Last edited by cdowns; 05-25-2010 at 07:35 PM.
cdowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 08:57 AM   #4
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
Re: TH350 vs 200R4

there are too many variables to answer either question.
What gear ratio do you have in the diff, ans what size tires do you have. What is your cruise speed?
Adding an overdrive can actually HURT the MPG on the freeway if you have tall gears out back.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 08:58 AM   #5
raycow
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: San Francisco, CA USA
Posts: 2,454
Re: TH350 vs 200R4

The rpm drop will be a little better than the O/D ratio because the 200-4R has a converter lockup. Even a "tight" converter still slips at highway speed.

Ray
raycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 09:30 AM   #6
ubtripn
Registered User
 
ubtripn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Boise, ID
Posts: 1,280
Re: TH350 vs 200R4

I am interested in this as well since I have a powerglide and want to switch. So which one is overall better? Stronger? More efficient? (sorry, not trying to hijack your thread)

Last edited by ubtripn; 05-25-2010 at 09:31 AM.
ubtripn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 03:49 PM   #7
gonzo6869
Cops, ha, catch me if you can!
 
gonzo6869's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Santa Barbara, CA.
Posts: 271
Re: TH350 vs 200R4

I currently have the th350 and I am looking at going with the 200-4r. With my set-up now; 3.73 gears and a 26" tire(275 60 15) at 60 I am pushing about 2800-2900RPM, with the swap to the 200-4r evryting else the same, my RPM will drop to 2395 (thats at 70MPH). Thats a good drop in RPM and I believe it will increase my MPG on the highway to about 12 or so.
__________________
72 C-10 Stepper
350/TH350
3.73 in the back
Edelbrock intake and Carb
Hooker Comp Headers
275/60R15 on Rallies

gonzo6869 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 06:24 PM   #8
cparman
sharp as a marble
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: atlantic beach,florida
Posts: 1,082
Re: TH350 vs 200R4

Find an RPM calculator on the web. The inputs to this formula will be : tire size, gear ratio, and MPH. I am a big fan of the 200r4, because of the spread in the gear ratio's of the transmission. 700r4 has a very low 1st gear.

I will tell you that to get a 200 to shift firm in all gears can be some work. UNLESS you get the BRF calibration. I have done several of these, and it usually takes dropping the pan a time or two to get what I like in firm, but not too harsh shifts.

The final drive ratio in a 200 is .67
cparman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 07:37 PM   #9
cdowns
Senior Member
 
cdowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: daytonabeach
Posts: 22,956
Re: TH350 vs 200R4

Quote:
Originally Posted by cparman View Post
Find an RPM calculator on the web. The inputs to this formula will be : tire size, gear ratio, and MPH. I am a big fan of the 200r4, because of the spread in the gear ratio's of the transmission. 700r4 has a very low 1st gear.

I will tell you that to get a 200 to shift firm in all gears can be some work. UNLESS you get the BRF calibration. I have done several of these, and it usually takes dropping the pan a time or two to get what I like in firm, but not too harsh shifts.

The final drive ratio in a 200 is .67
for some reason most seem to believe the final drive is ,71

http://fbperformance.com/viewtrans.a...nsmissionID=27
__________________
71c-10 350/2004r/4:11 lowered3/4 longbed/dead by hurricane

MEANING OF DEATH::::: SOMEBODY ELSE GETS YOUR STUFF

DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK

TAKE MY ADVISE;I DON'T USE IT ANYWAY

Last edited by cdowns; 05-25-2010 at 08:14 PM.
cdowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 08:53 PM   #10
gonzo6869
Cops, ha, catch me if you can!
 
gonzo6869's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Santa Barbara, CA.
Posts: 271
Re: TH350 vs 200R4

Gear ratios of the 200-4R are: 2.74 first, 1.57 second, 1.00 third,
.67 fourth.
You will find different answers depending on the website you’re looking at
__________________
72 C-10 Stepper
350/TH350
3.73 in the back
Edelbrock intake and Carb
Hooker Comp Headers
275/60R15 on Rallies

gonzo6869 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 09:08 PM   #11
capev86
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Eliot, Maine
Posts: 1,314
Re: TH350 vs 200R4

my dad's suburbans with stock size tires:

'72 2wd w/ th350, 305 swap, q-jet and 3.73 gears: 15mpg highway (60mph)

'84 2wd w/ 700-r4, 350 q-jet and 3.73 gears: 18mph highway

'87 2wd w/ 700-r4, 350 tbi and 3.73 gears: 18mpg highway

you guys need to remember that trucks have poor aerodynamics and weigh more yet everyone is driving faster and faster each day. mpg's drop off drastically over 60mph as drag increases exponentially. even with optimal highway gearing, most vehicles get best fuel mileage around 50mph. keep it to 60-65 so you aren't contributing unduly to all the anti-truck/tree hugging/poor mpg hype!

Last edited by capev86; 05-25-2010 at 09:08 PM.
capev86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 09:17 PM   #12
gonzo6869
Cops, ha, catch me if you can!
 
gonzo6869's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Santa Barbara, CA.
Posts: 271
Re: TH350 vs 200R4

I really don't care about milage, right now I get about 8.5-9MPG and that dose not bother me. All I really want is to be able to drive on the freeway (60 or so) and not be pushing 2900RPM. The mileage increase would be nice, but if I don't see an increase I would not care.
__________________
72 C-10 Stepper
350/TH350
3.73 in the back
Edelbrock intake and Carb
Hooker Comp Headers
275/60R15 on Rallies

gonzo6869 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2010, 09:27 PM   #13
capev86
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Eliot, Maine
Posts: 1,314
Re: TH350 vs 200R4

you are nuts....

i think less than 10mpg sucks....even back 12 years ago when gas was still a buck a gallon. my 72 burb gets 10-11 with a 307, 3 on the tree (more efficient than an auto) and 4.57 rear gears. i'm swapping a 4.10 third member into the ho52 rear and hoping to get my mileage up to 14 or so. 50 bucks for gas every 200 miles makes it really tough to enjoy driving my truck. guess i'll have to save up a bit for the big camping trip coming in a couple months. i'll be back down to 8-10 pulling the family camper!
capev86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com