The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-01-2010, 03:19 PM   #1
blazer2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: vernon b.c.
Posts: 3,022
A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

I found this article and if you look at it the truck is awful low without a z frame or crossmember.Will tubular a-arms give you that much more lowering.I have spindles with no cups and I,m still along ways away from that.I,m running 15 in. tires,does the 20,s do anything like their running. http://www.sporttruck.com/techarticl...c10/index.html
blazer2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2010, 03:26 PM   #2
Shane
Account Suspended
 
Shane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: over yonder
Posts: 14,270
Re: A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

please avoid chassis tech at all costs ...
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2010, 03:29 PM   #3
blazer2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: vernon b.c.
Posts: 3,022
Re: A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

I know to stay away,and I know the truck is really not on the frame but will the a-arms give me that much more or is it an illusion with the big rims.It still sits alot lower than mine
blazer2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2010, 03:34 PM   #4
JNJchev77
Registered Cruiser
 
JNJchev77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 918
Re: A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

Tubular arms will give you a little more drop, probably 2 or 3 more inches... then you may be on the crossmember...
JNJchev77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2010, 03:39 PM   #5
blazer2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: vernon b.c.
Posts: 3,022
Re: A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

That,s a big drop,here is a pic of mine and theirs
Attached Images
  
blazer2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2010, 03:46 PM   #6
JNJchev77
Registered Cruiser
 
JNJchev77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 918
Re: A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

Yep, looks like another 3" to me...
JNJchev77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2010, 03:51 PM   #7
blazer2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: vernon b.c.
Posts: 3,022
Re: A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

Well I guess I will save my pennies.Would all tubular arms be the same as giving that extra drop and what would be a good company,P.B. ?
blazer2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2010, 04:07 PM   #8
dv8customs
Registered User
 
dv8customs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: East Texas
Posts: 1,047
Re: A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

There are two ways tubular arms can get you lower. The first is simply because they are smaller. If you look at the size of your stock arm around the cross shaft you will see that it is pretty large. Tubular arms are going to be slightly larger than the large washer that holds your bushings in place. The second way they will help is that the upper arm usually is built with a different angle on the ball joint. This will prevent binding of the joint which could let you get lower.

You can get arms from Porter Built, Suicide Doors, CPP, or Air Ride Tech...

Last edited by dv8customs; 07-01-2010 at 04:08 PM.
dv8customs is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2010, 04:50 PM   #9
DKN
Active Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Los Angles CA
Posts: 136
Re: A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

Quote:
Originally Posted by blazer2007 View Post
Well I guess I will save my pennies.Would all tubular arms be the same as giving that extra drop and what would be a good company,P.B. ?
CPP tubular lower arms do NOT use the large factort type bushing. The CPP arms will allow the truck to sit on the crossmember.

Danny Nix
CPP
DKN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2010, 08:44 PM   #10
Mad Rods
Chevy Only Tx
 
Mad Rods's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Pecos,Tx
Posts: 1,061
Re: A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

Man, that's an ugly gap on the brown chassis tech truck front wheels..
__________________
Chevy Only Tx.........
Mad Rods is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2010, 12:38 AM   #11
draggin86
Registered User
 
draggin86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Folsom, Ca
Posts: 573
Re: A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

looks like you wont have much of a bed floor with that upper link setup too
draggin86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2010, 12:42 AM   #12
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,023
Re: A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

I did not read the article again, because of the bogus company it pertains to. I can tell you for a fact that a 73-87 truck will only go as low as the stock crossmember will allow. Once that hits the ground, it CAN NOT go any lower.
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2010, 04:48 PM   #13
DKN
Active Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Los Angles CA
Posts: 136
Re: A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

Quote:
Originally Posted by N2TRUX View Post
I did not read the article again, because of the bogus company it pertains to. I can tell you for a fact that a 73-87 truck will only go as low as the stock crossmember will allow. Once that hits the ground, it CAN NOT go any lower.
You said was I was thinking.

Danny Nix
CPP

Last edited by DKN; 07-02-2010 at 04:49 PM.
DKN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2010, 05:17 PM   #14
JNJchev77
Registered Cruiser
 
JNJchev77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 918
Re: A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Rods View Post
Man, that's an ugly gap on the brown chassis tech truck front wheels..

Looks like they moved the wheels even further back??
JNJchev77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2010, 06:55 PM   #15
blazer2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: vernon b.c.
Posts: 3,022
Re: A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

Quote:
Originally Posted by N2TRUX View Post
I did not read the article again, because of the bogus company it pertains to. I can tell you for a fact that a 73-87 truck will only go as low as the stock crossmember will allow. Once that hits the ground, it CAN NOT go any lower.
I know it will only go that low, but I didn,t think a tube a-arm would make that much difference.I,m not a fan of this company either,but was just a reference for me to look at.
blazer2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2010, 09:20 PM   #16
Shane
Account Suspended
 
Shane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: over yonder
Posts: 14,270
Re: A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

Quote:
Originally Posted by N2TRUX View Post
I did not read the article again, because of the bogus company it pertains to ...
Amen!
Shane is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2010, 09:22 PM   #17
JNJchev77
Registered Cruiser
 
JNJchev77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 918
Re: A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

Quote:
Originally Posted by blazer2007 View Post
I know it will only go that low, but I didn,t think a tube a-arm would make that much difference.I,m not a fan of this company either,but was just a reference for me to look at.

Your initial post made reference to a "z" or crossmember. So that makes it sound like you are comparing the stance of the chassis tech truck to that of a truck with porterbuilt suspension or a "z"... They are not close imo.
JNJchev77 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2010, 10:22 AM   #18
blazer2007
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: vernon b.c.
Posts: 3,022
Re: A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

I said it looks awful low without a z or a P.B..I just didn,t know anything about the tubelar a-arms making a difference,I thought that Chass. tec had something new.I did give the pic more contrast to get rid of the shadows and can see better now the distance between the body and the ground.I think with the 20 in wheels makes the illusion of beinng that much lower,but all in all I think I will buy some ccp arms for the extra inches plus looks cleaner
blazer2007 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2010, 10:34 AM   #19
N2TRUX
Happy to be here
 
N2TRUX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 39,023
Re: A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

Quote:
Originally Posted by blazer2007 View Post
.... all in all I think I will buy some ccp arms for the extra inches plus looks cleaner
Good choice....
__________________
Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com

Articles-

"Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab

"Elwood" the77_Remix

85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett"

"Refining Sierra"
N2TRUX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2010, 12:00 PM   #20
b&a72
Active Member
 
b&a72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 682
Re: A article I found on laying frame w/o PB crossmember

That company is a joke I have been to there warehouse and seen some of the things they do and make and would never put it on any of my trucks. We used to service thier air compressors and had to threaten to turn them over to collection for not paying their bills.
b&a72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com