The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Racing and high performance (trucks haulin more than hay)

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-02-2010, 04:16 PM   #1
bosephus
Registered User
 
bosephus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: texas gulf coast
Posts: 211
opinions on this combo

I've pretty much settled on these parts:350 bored .020,AFR vortec 190cc,rpm air gap,holley 670 cfm,between 9.7-10:1 compression.I'm wondering about the cam.What do ya'll think of these two? Lunati #60110 with 211/219 duration @ .050 with 507/515 lift OR Lunati#60112 with 231/239 duration @ .050 with 535/550 lift. Truck is a 61 short with 3.90 rear and a TKO-600 tranny and 27'' tall tires.Planning on running power brakes so the question is "which cam would you pick and why?"All opinions/advice wil be appreciated!
bosephus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2010, 05:07 PM   #2
nomrlz
Registered User
 
nomrlz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Wataga,IL
Posts: 666
Re: opinions on this combo

you're gonna need that 550 lift cam to make those heads work. you want to stick with 1.5 rockers instead of 1.6's to keep it at the 550 mark.
nomrlz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2010, 06:50 PM   #3
stich626
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: hingham ma
Posts: 1,721
Re: opinions on this combo

you have nice parts but the cam, you want power brakes, and you have 390 gear and an overdrive.
with those heads you want lift under the peak.. and that will mean a hyd roller..
it will get the valve open wider faster. and let you use those heads..
what lobe sep angle you thinking of .. 104/106/110/112/114/???????
stich626 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2010, 09:10 PM   #4
Super73
Registered User
 
Super73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Posts: 2,841
Re: opinions on this combo

That is a rather large difference between cams..

What is your intended use of your truck?
Is it a max effort street ride?
Is it a daily driver/hot rod?
What rpm are you comfy spining it too?
__________________
------Motor---------------Bottle
60'---1.53---------------1.41
1/8---6.58 @ 105.92----5.87 @ 118.41
1/4---10.38 @ 126.97----9.24 @ 142.49
Super73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2010, 09:38 PM   #5
HOGDADDY
Registered User
 
HOGDADDY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 661
Re: opinions on this combo

I have the Lunati 60110 roller cam and Lunati retro lifters in a 9.5:1 350 with Edelbrock RPM heads,[I had to change valve springs to a (small) dual w/dampner] crane gold rockers,Edelbrock 650, 3:73 rear 700r4 trans.

It has plenty of vacuum for power brakes, idles smooth but has plenty of power/torque down low. I like it personally but probably could have went 1 step up.

You might want to consider the Lunati 60111.

•Advertised Duration (Int/Exh): 270/278
•Duration @ .050 (Int/Exh): 219/227
•Gross Valve Lift (Int/Exh): .515/.530
•LSA/ICL: 112/106

Last edited by HOGDADDY; 11-02-2010 at 09:44 PM.
HOGDADDY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2010, 03:43 AM   #6
bosephus
Registered User
 
bosephus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: texas gulf coast
Posts: 211
Re: opinions on this combo

Quote:
Originally Posted by stich626 View Post
you have nice parts but the cam, you want power brakes, and you have 390 gear and an overdrive.
with those heads you want lift under the peak.. and that will mean a hyd roller..
it will get the valve open wider faster. and let you use those heads..
what lobe sep angle you thinking of .. 104/106/110/112/114/???????
I forgot to mention this was going to be a roller camThe smaller cam(507/515)has an LSA of 112;the larger(535/550) has an LSA of 110.Would I be better off going with 180cc heads?I picked the 190 heads for a possible future 383 upgrade.Thanks!
bosephus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2010, 03:47 AM   #7
bosephus
Registered User
 
bosephus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: texas gulf coast
Posts: 211
Re: opinions on this combo

Quote:
Originally Posted by Super73 View Post
That is a rather large difference between cams..

What is your intended use of your truck?
Is it a max effort street ride?
Is it a daily driver/hot rod?
What rpm are you comfy spining it too?
The truck will be used just for fun/hotrod(unless my new truck breaks down!)I'm planning on getting the rotating assembly balanced so I guess 6200 rpm isn't out of the question.Thnks!
bosephus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2010, 03:57 AM   #8
bosephus
Registered User
 
bosephus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: texas gulf coast
Posts: 211
Re: opinions on this combo

Quote:
Originally Posted by HOGDADDY View Post
I have the Lunati 60110 roller cam and Lunati retro lifters in a 9.5:1 350 with Edelbrock RPM heads,[I had to change valve springs to a (small) dual w/dampner] crane gold rockers,Edelbrock 650, 3:73 rear 700r4 trans.

It has plenty of vacuum for power brakes, idles smooth but has plenty of power/torque down low. I like it personally but probably could have went 1 step up.

You might want to consider the Lunati 60111.

•Advertised Duration (Int/Exh): 270/278
•Duration @ .050 (Int/Exh): 219/227
•Gross Valve Lift (Int/Exh): .515/.530
•LSA/ICL: 112/106
What kind of h.p. did you get out of your combo?It sounds like its working well for you.I just dont know what to expect from either of these cams,I dont want my truck to be like trying to drive a dragster through town yet I would like it to be fast!Thanks for your reply
bosephus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 07:46 PM   #9
bosephus
Registered User
 
bosephus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: texas gulf coast
Posts: 211
Re: opinions on this combo

Gotta order parts soon,do you guys think the big cam will be okay on the street?
bosephus is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2010, 08:59 PM   #10
bradh
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Nebraska
Posts: 84
Re: opinions on this combo

If it helps you out any I'm running a 218/228 @.050 .525 lift and 112 LSA roller in a 355 and it runs the power brakes just fine, heck I get 12 mpg pulling my boat with it.

GM Part #24502586

Last edited by bradh; 11-04-2010 at 09:01 PM.
bradh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-05-2010, 12:47 PM   #11
stich626
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: hingham ma
Posts: 1,721
Re: opinions on this combo

if you're going 383 later the bigger cam will not "seem " as big as in the 350
stich626 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com