The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-06-2003, 12:53 PM   #1
85Silverado
Registered User
 
85Silverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 198
Rocker Arms

Does anyone know the ratio of the arms on a '84 LE9 engine? Also, what has to be replaced if I buy new rockers? I was hoping to step the ratio up (ex. 1.5 to 1, to 1.6 to 1) and hopefully get a little extra power. What else would need to be replaced or adjusted? Any help and comments would be appreciated.
__________________
Paul D.

'78 C20 Scottsdale
350ci
3 speed with granny gear
14 bolt rearend


My trucks are "Car-Guy safe".......which pretty much means death trap in the hands of a normal civilian.
85Silverado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2003, 02:08 PM   #2
Tom
driving is in my blood
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mesa AZ
Posts: 5,748
stock is 1.5
I wouldnt go with 1.6's. MUCH better idea to just pick a correct cam. It will cost the same [$150 for rockers, $150 for cam+lifters] and give more power.
__________________
-78 c10 short/step: 388cid, M20, 5/5 drop, lots more. Playtoy and first vehicle.
-98 c1500 x-cab: 5.7L, 17" rims, 5/6 drop, flowmaster, helper bags,NBS rear disk brakes.
-02 Suburban 4x4: leveled front
-CBR600F4i, CBR600RR, CBR1000RR, and standup skis
DISCLAIMER: I cant spell for the life of me.
Tom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2003, 02:23 PM   #3
85Silverado
Registered User
 
85Silverado's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 198
That essentially what i wanted to do, but i have to stay within emissions and I'm not that well versed in installing a cam and don't want to tear that much of the engine apart. Ideally I'd want to just buy a brand new crate motor and be done with it tho..hehe
__________________
Paul D.

'78 C20 Scottsdale
350ci
3 speed with granny gear
14 bolt rearend


My trucks are "Car-Guy safe".......which pretty much means death trap in the hands of a normal civilian.
85Silverado is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2003, 07:17 PM   #4
87 STEPPER
STILL PLAYS WITH TRUX
 
87 STEPPER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Melbourne, Fla.
Posts: 2,764
Changing the cam is actualy less work than changing just the rocker arm's.

Removing the H2O pump, timing chain cover, and the lifters are the only extra thing's you need to do.

If you only do the rocker arms and you go to 1.6 ratio i wolud highly reccomend you also replace the valve spring's this is where it become's more work than changing just the cam cuz the new rocker arm's are longer and will compress the spring's more, to the point where the spring will not compress any more and binding will occure and you will more than likely brake something And the extra power you will gain porbably wont even be noticeable.

I agree with tom you can do a 1.5 ratio cam change and gain more power and spend less money and if you do some research you can select one that will keep you emission's legal

Good luck
__________________
~~Bruce~~

MY 87 STEPPER

MY 99 2D/WD TAHOE

Last edited by 87 STEPPER; 03-06-2003 at 07:20 PM.
87 STEPPER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2003, 08:18 PM   #5
swervin ervin
You get what you pay for
 
swervin ervin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Cherryville, NC
Posts: 4,798
I run a CompCams XE268 cam and pass emissions easily. This cam is not emissions legal, but who knows about it but us, right?

I agree, going with a stock cam and only changing rockers from 1.5's to 1.6's is not going to make big power gains. It will probably help a tad, but not worth the effort to me.

I run Comp Magnum roller tipped rockers, and they are 1.6 ratio. I could not tell you if they made a difference over a 1.5 ratio or not. The reason I did it is to increase lift, without raising the duration. Although, it does make the cam act like it has a tad more duration.

Single biggest thing besides a cam to do for power is heads. As a matter of fact, heads are the single best upgrade you can make on any engine. Stock heads suck, especially 305 heads. Personally, I wouldn't waste my time putting too much into a 305. It just ain't worth it.
__________________
Mike

1985 Chevy C-10
swervin ervin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-06-2003, 09:17 PM   #6
79BIG10
I'm back with 2nd truck!
 
79BIG10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,774
I ahve a ZZ4 and even with that I passed emissions. It's all about how clean the system runs. You could have a totally stock engine that burns rich of course it will fail. But if you have a street engine that runs on 92 and has a good lope it can pass with the right emissions equiment in place and working correctly.
__________________
1979 Chevrolet Bonanza Big10 "Tootsie Roll"
1985 Chevrolet Silverado (wife's)
Member of the Southern Bowties Club

"Don't underestimate how sexy a fat man who drinks to excess can be." Homer Simpson
79BIG10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com