The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2011, 11:10 AM   #1
1972K20
Registered User
 
1972K20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 739
Positive Traction vs. No Spin Rear Axle

What's the difference between these two options? Is it basically just terminology? I've seen both listed as options for our trucks.
1972K20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2011, 01:35 PM   #2
special-K
Special Order

 
special-K's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Mt Airy, MD
Posts: 85,858
Re: Positive Traction vs. No Spin Rear Axle

You will find positive traction in 1/2t and Dana60 3/4t trucks and No-Spin only in 3/4t & 1t trucks with the corporate rear (HO52 & HO72 respectively). The posi in Dana60s is called Power-Loc,not sure about 1/2t but I think just Posi-Traction. The way they work is the second wheel engages when the first wheel starts to slip,giving traction to both wheels. the No-Spin is a locker,which means both wheels are engaged all the time. These are actually Detroit Lockers,which you may have heard of.
__________________
"BUILDING A BETTER WAY TO SERVE THE USA"......67/72......"The New Breed"

GMC '67 C1500 Wideside Super Custom SWB: 327/M22/3.42 posi.........."The '67" (project)
GMC '72 K2500 Wideside Sierra Custom Camper: 350/TH350/4.10 Power-Lok..."The '72" (rolling)
Tim

"Don't call me a redneck. I'm a rough cut country gentleman"

R.I.P. ~ East Side Low Life ~ El Jay ~ 72BLUZ ~ Fasteddie69 ~ Ron586 ~ 67ChevyRedneck ~ Grumpy Old Man ~
special-K is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2011, 01:45 PM   #3
CSGAS
optomistic ah-so
 
CSGAS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 544
Re: Positive Traction vs. No Spin Rear Axle

"Posi-Traction" is actually a trademarked name for the particular method GM used in offering anti-wheel spin technology. Like Special-K said, it and the others engages the second axle and wheel when the first looses traction.

GM's particular design involves flat clutch packs. Others use cone-shaped clutches, helical-engaged gears, and a variety of technologies. Each one used a different name along with their particular patent, and sometimes are only different enough to earn a separate patent (which enabled one maker to avoid paying license fees to another maker).

I actually didn't know "No-Spin" was a Detroit locker installation...nice.
__________________
Rubbing is Racin'
Ribbing is Bench Racin'


1970 C-10 lwb Fleetside. Originally 350 2-bbl 3-on-the-tree, m/b, m/w, m/s no a/c. Currently running on a '76 Camaro 305.
CSGAS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2011, 05:16 PM   #4
1972K20
Registered User
 
1972K20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Alabama
Posts: 739
Re: Positive Traction vs. No Spin Rear Axle

Great info, thanks!
1972K20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:26 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com