'67 or '77? - The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network

manimal · 03-03-2011, 12:14 PM

OK, I need some logical opinions.
I have a 1967 CST C20 with a great running 350,body is in pretty good shape,th400,buddy buckets,power assist steering,power drum brakes,BUT it has $600 owed in back fees.
I also have my '77 Silverado C20,body too is in pretty good shape,no engine,th350,p/s,p/b,a/c stuff,registered non-op in my name,BUT needs to pass emissions test(not too bad for the year).
My question is should I pull the engine out of the '67 and get the '77 running and on the road, OR should I suck it up and pay the $600 in fees for the '67? Thanks for the infinite wisdom!
Here are a couple pics of each.

**N2TRUX** · 03-03-2011, 12:24 PM

The 67 looks to be in better overall condition. I would get it on the road first.

Pop's C-10 · 03-03-2011, 12:34 PM

I agree

THE "10" SILVERADO · 03-03-2011, 01:33 PM

The 67 looks nice and they are a lot more rare (rarer?) to find in good condition but are more expensive to take care of due to lack of parts. The 77 looks fine and could be cheaper to maintain and replace parts but if it were me (though I love squares) I'd go with the 67 first.

JimmyFloyd · 03-03-2011, 02:24 PM

I would pay the fees myself for the 67. You'll be $600 deep in replacement parts and time doing the swap, and then left with a 67, $600 in fees and no motor. besides, the 67 is a rarer trucks with the options.

JHT67 · 03-03-2011, 05:22 PM

I say the 67'. I am so glad I don't live in California, my 85' sat for at least 2 years, tagged it, drove it. And even though my 67' is in pieces, if I got it together, I could tag it and be on my way, and I have no idea when it was last tagged. I really feel for you all out that way.

manimal · 03-03-2011, 08:20 PM

Thanks for the input. I think I will use the '77 for parts on the '67. Disc brakes,14blt rear axle,power steering. then I guess I will part the rest out.

**old Rusty C10** · 03-03-2011, 10:51 PM

as much as i hate to see a good square go to parts i think youre right on this one

Newtz67 · 03-03-2011, 10:52 PM

It seems obvious to me to go with the '67, but I may be a bit biased haha.

manimal · 03-04-2011, 12:28 AM

The thing that sucks about parting the '77 out is it cost me $312 in DMV fees.

THE "10" SILVERADO · 03-04-2011, 12:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by manimal

The thing that sucks about parting the '77 out is it cost me $312 in DMV fees.

I remember you posting about that a little while back...but if you salvage the parts from it for your 67...why not try to sell it as a frame and body combo? just let someone else make it a project truck...don't know how'd that go but just an option

Gregs71 · 03-04-2011, 12:46 AM

Are you looking to keep both trucks, or make one good one out of two, and sell the difference. If you want to keep both, nothing wrong with driving the 77 with 67 motor so you have a driver. You can always put it back in the 67 later after you fix it up the way you want.

I would think you could sell a rust free 77 cab with no back fees /non-op for $300 to re-coop your losses.

I THINK, if you go to DMV and make a payment on the 67, it will freeze the back fees for one year so they dont go up again(and it buys you time to pay off the $600).

manimal · 03-04-2011, 02:24 AM

I have also thought about putting in an 'LS' series engine/trans in the '67. That might be an option,pull the 350 out of the '67-drop into the '77 and have a running truck by the end of the weekend. Then I can build the '67 the way I really want it.

manimal · 03-11-2011, 11:54 AM

Well, looks like I might be selling both. My wife is not "PROJECT FRIENDLY",her entire family have had project cars/hot rods/race cars and she thinks I should just go buy something "nice"....WTF!?...........................maybe I should get rid of her and keep the trucks!!!!hahaha

Toxic Redline · 03-11-2011, 01:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by manimal

maybe I should get rid of her and keep the trucks!!!!hahaha

now your onto something!!

you could always put the 67 body on the 77 frame??? seen it done just and option

manimal · 03-13-2011, 05:01 PM

Well, after looking at the work and money involved, I have decided to keep the '77 and sell my '67. I am removing the 350 for the '67 and cleaning and reinstalling in the '77 so I can drive it.It's already in my name where as the '67 has the back fees owed. 'someone' NEEDS a '67 either for a driver/project or parts.

03-03-2011, 12:14 PM	#1
manimal Registered User Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Southern Kalifornia Posts: 3,066	'67 or '77?...keeping the '77 UPDATE. OK, I need some logical opinions. I have a 1967 CST C20 with a great running 350,body is in pretty good shape,th400,buddy buckets,power assist steering,power drum brakes,BUT it has $600 owed in back fees. I also have my '77 Silverado C20,body too is in pretty good shape,no engine,th350,p/s,p/b,a/c stuff,registered non-op in my name,BUT needs to pass emissions test(not too bad for the year). My question is should I pull the engine out of the '67 and get the '77 running and on the road, OR should I suck it up and pay the $600 in fees for the '67? Thanks for the infinite wisdom! Here are a couple pics of each. Attached Images __________________ ------------------------------------------------------ -Lance 2000 Chevy C2500, 5.7, 4L80e 1999 Suburban K2500, 7.4, 4L80e 1980 Camaro..son's car...PROJECT Last edited by manimal; 03-13-2011 at 04:51 PM.

03-03-2011, 12:24 PM	#2
N2TRUX Happy to be here Join Date: Mar 2000 Location: Cypress, TX Posts: 39,023	Re: '67 or '77? The 67 looks to be in better overall condition. I would get it on the road first. __________________ Follow me on Facebook and Instagram @N2trux.com Articles- "Jake" the 84 to 74 crewcab "Elwood" the77_Remix 85 GMC Sierra "Scarlett" "Refining Sierra"

03-03-2011, 12:34 PM	#3
Pop's C-10 Registered User Join Date: Jul 2010 Location: memphis Posts: 2,537	Re: '67 or '77? I agree

03-03-2011, 01:33 PM	#4
THE "10" SILVERADO Registered User Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Marble Falls, TX Posts: 1,575	Re: '67 or '77? The 67 looks nice and they are a lot more rare (rarer?) to find in good condition but are more expensive to take care of due to lack of parts. The 77 looks fine and could be cheaper to maintain and replace parts but if it were me (though I love squares) I'd go with the 67 first. __________________ Michael Re-starting the neglected '77...http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=425464&page=9

03-03-2011, 02:24 PM	#5
JimmyFloyd Registered User Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Rochester, NY Posts: 1,458	Re: '67 or '77? I would pay the fees myself for the 67. You'll be $600 deep in replacement parts and time doing the swap, and then left with a 67, $600 in fees and no motor. besides, the 67 is a rarer trucks with the options. __________________ 1970 Blazer 350/SM465/205 SOLD! \| 1998 Z3

03-03-2011, 05:22 PM	#6
JHT67 Registered User Join Date: Jan 2010 Location: columbus, ohio Posts: 972	Re: '67 or '77? I say the 67'. I am so glad I don't live in California, my 85' sat for at least 2 years, tagged it, drove it. And even though my 67' is in pieces, if I got it together, I could tag it and be on my way, and I have no idea when it was last tagged. I really feel for you all out that way.

03-03-2011, 08:20 PM	#7
manimal Registered User Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Southern Kalifornia Posts: 3,066	Re: '67 or '77? Thanks for the input. I think I will use the '77 for parts on the '67. Disc brakes,14blt rear axle,power steering. then I guess I will part the rest out. __________________ ------------------------------------------------------ -Lance 2000 Chevy C2500, 5.7, 4L80e 1999 Suburban K2500, 7.4, 4L80e 1980 Camaro..son's car...PROJECT

03-03-2011, 10:51 PM	#8
old Rusty C10 Robert Olson Transport Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: recent transplant to NC USA Posts: 20,299	Re: '67 or '77? as much as i hate to see a good square go to parts i think youre right on this one __________________ Bob 1951 International running on a squarebody chassis "If a man's worth is judged by the people he associates himself with, then i am the richest man in the world knowing some of the fine people of this board" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/a...t.php?f=25&a=9 (you can review the site rules here!) PM Me for your vehicle/parts hauling needs in the North East US or see my Facebook page Robert Olson Transport Live each day to the fullest.. you never know when fate is going to pull the rug out from under you... I hate cancer!!

03-03-2011, 10:52 PM	#9
Newtz67 Registered User Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: A t w a t e r, Ca Posts: 1,201	Re: '67 or '77? It seems obvious to me to go with the '67, but I may be a bit biased haha. __________________ My '67 short wide Our '68 Burb My '04 Z71 The '54 Belair The '69 Cadillac

03-04-2011, 12:28 AM	#10
manimal Registered User Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Southern Kalifornia Posts: 3,066	Re: '67 or '77? The thing that sucks about parting the '77 out is it cost me $312 in DMV fees. __________________ ------------------------------------------------------ -Lance 2000 Chevy C2500, 5.7, 4L80e 1999 Suburban K2500, 7.4, 4L80e 1980 Camaro..son's car...PROJECT

03-04-2011, 12:46 AM	#12
Gregs71 Registered User Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: Amador County, Ca. Posts: 229	Re: '67 or '77? Are you looking to keep both trucks, or make one good one out of two, and sell the difference. If you want to keep both, nothing wrong with driving the 77 with 67 motor so you have a driver. You can always put it back in the 67 later after you fix it up the way you want. I would think you could sell a rust free 77 cab with no back fees /non-op for $300 to re-coop your losses. I THINK, if you go to DMV and make a payment on the 67, it will freeze the back fees for one year so they dont go up again(and it buys you time to pay off the $600). __________________ 1995 GMC 4x4 1/2 ton 1999 Jeep Wrangler w/ 33's 68 camaro 350/350 1987 Chevy 3/4 ton 4x4 Suzuki DRZ 400s Dual Sport 1971 chevy long bed 2x4 194? Dodge 2.5 ton 1980 Chevy Cheyenne 4x4 1/2 ton I6/sm455 1989 Chevy V30 crewcab dually 454/TH400

03-04-2011, 02:24 AM	#13
manimal Registered User Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Southern Kalifornia Posts: 3,066	Re: '67 or '77? I have also thought about putting in an 'LS' series engine/trans in the '67. That might be an option,pull the 350 out of the '67-drop into the '77 and have a running truck by the end of the weekend. Then I can build the '67 the way I really want it. __________________ ------------------------------------------------------ -Lance 2000 Chevy C2500, 5.7, 4L80e 1999 Suburban K2500, 7.4, 4L80e 1980 Camaro..son's car...PROJECT

03-11-2011, 11:54 AM	#14
manimal Registered User Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Southern Kalifornia Posts: 3,066	Re: '67 or '77? Well, looks like I might be selling both. My wife is not "PROJECT FRIENDLY",her entire family have had project cars/hot rods/race cars and she thinks I should just go buy something "nice"....WTF!?...........................maybe I should get rid of her and keep the trucks!!!!hahaha __________________ ------------------------------------------------------ -Lance 2000 Chevy C2500, 5.7, 4L80e 1999 Suburban K2500, 7.4, 4L80e 1980 Camaro..son's car...PROJECT

03-13-2011, 05:01 PM	#16
manimal Registered User Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Southern Kalifornia Posts: 3,066	Re: '67 or '77? Well, after looking at the work and money involved, I have decided to keep the '77 and sell my '67. I am removing the 350 for the '67 and cleaning and reinstalling in the '77 so I can drive it.It's already in my name where as the '67 has the back fees owed. 'someone' NEEDS a '67 either for a driver/project or parts. __________________ ------------------------------------------------------ -Lance 2000 Chevy C2500, 5.7, 4L80e 1999 Suburban K2500, 7.4, 4L80e 1980 Camaro..son's car...PROJECT



Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.