The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-16-2011, 06:06 PM   #1
baggedbigblock
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Rich Virginia
Posts: 336
65 trailing arms VS 4 link

I searched the site already. My truck is at the fabricators right now, I want a budget build for a 350hp truck, no drag racing just fun on the streets.

I have the bag setup already and we are putting 2.5" spindles and bags up front and the rear I am not sure about.

I was going to just bag the trailing arm with a 3" block and fab up a rear bar, the fabricator says I will have left to right movement when I raise and lower the truck. I plan on running 295/50/15 tires on 15x10 and I dont want to worry about the sidewall hitting one side or the other. I dont want to cheap out either but I am not sure if I need to spend 350 more on a universal 4 link.

To give you a better idea, I plan on parking on the frame, riding 2" off the ground and then fully inflating only over curbs/speed bumps. I figure he can set up the rear to be level at ride height and with a bag in factory spring location will I really get that much side to side movement?
baggedbigblock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2011, 07:17 PM   #2
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,071
Re: 65 trailing arms VS 4 link

Use a Panhard bar that connects to the pass side truck arm vs. the shorter factory location @ the top of the differential housing. The longer bar would help minimize side to side shift. How much movement will depend on how much total travel there is for the suspension.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2011, 07:59 PM   #3
baggedbigblock
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Rich Virginia
Posts: 336
Re: 65 trailing arms VS 4 link

thanks, we will fab up a bar and test it out. I plan on aligning the truck at 2" off the ground and prob a total of 8" of lift, however much a 2600 bag can lift in stock spring location.

Because of my wide tire setup are we talking 1/4" 3/4" or 1.5" movement?? I just dont want the tire hitting the fender.
baggedbigblock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2011, 08:57 PM   #4
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,071
Re: 65 trailing arms VS 4 link

Quote:
Originally Posted by baggedbigblock View Post
thanks, we will fab up a bar and test it out. I plan on aligning the truck at 2" off the ground and prob a total of 8" of lift, however much a 2600 bag can lift in stock spring location.

Because of my wide tire setup are we talking 1/4" 3/4" or 1.5" movement?? I just dont want the tire hitting the fender.
Prob < .500".
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011, 09:03 AM   #5
fleetsidelarry
Senior Car Nut
 
fleetsidelarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: shellman bluff, GA
Posts: 1,411
Re: 65 trailing arms VS 4 link

Just draw it out on the shop floor, you can readily see and measure the amount of side movement for any given vertical travel, as the track bar (panhard) swings through its arc. Or, of course, get someone to do it on CAD. I'm old-fashioned (wonder why), I like seeing it full scale.
__________________
Larry

Last edited by fleetsidelarry; 04-17-2011 at 09:07 AM.
fleetsidelarry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011, 09:16 AM   #6
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,071
Re: 65 trailing arms VS 4 link

Quote:
Originally Posted by fleetsidelarry View Post
Just draw it out on the shop floor, you can readily see and measure the amount of side movement for any given vertical travel, as the track bar (panhard) swings through its arc. Or, of course, get someone to do it on CAD. I'm old-fashioned (wonder why), I like seeing it full scale.
Exactly. This is how I checked it in the past when comparing a 'short' factory length Panhard bar vs. a long bar.

I used the factory bar & a yardstick @ 36" w/some chalk in the driveway. I marked a reference spot @ level (ride height) & then marked reference spots @ +3/ -3" of up/down movement. Determine what range you'll have for your suspension travel, what length Panhard bar you plan to use, plot it out on the driveway, measure the difference, & you'll know what kind of shift to expect.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.

Last edited by SCOTI; 04-17-2011 at 09:34 AM.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-19-2011, 09:03 AM   #7
baggedbigblock
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Rich Virginia
Posts: 336
Re: 65 trailing arms VS 4 link

Thanks alot guys, I will set it up and see how it comes out.
baggedbigblock is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:32 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com