|
06-24-2011, 03:54 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Imperial Beach, CA
Posts: 1,040
|
MT vs BFG Drag Radial
So i burned off the BFG 315/60R15 in a hurry. They never hooked even after some 100+ yard burn outs. The MT 325/50R15 sit a little lower and give it a better stance. These are a bit softer and hook incredibly well. Very little warm up required. I have not done any huge burn outs on them. The only time i have noticed any spinning is when i hit it hard from a slow speed or stop and when cold. Even then they dont spin too long before hooking. I love them. They make the truck feel faster. The BFG would be slippery at 50+ hitting the throttle hard. These just hook so well.
Just wanted to share incase anyone was thinking of spending money.
__________________
69 c-10 BBC  462ci, forged crank, H-beam rods, 10.5-1 KB forged pistons, Dart Iron Eagle 308cc, Straub Cam, Comp Cams chrome moly full rollers, Weiand Team G, Prosystems 950, TH400/3500 Dalenzie stall, Currie 9+ Detroit Locker w/31spline axles.  3.5/6in drop. My Build.
|
|
|
|
06-24-2011, 05:52 PM
|
#2 |
|
It's Better With Nitro
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chino Hills, CA
Posts: 2,262
|
Re: MT vs BFG Drag Radial
Yep, I do prefer the MT ET Drag Radials over the BFGs. The tough thing with both tires is to fight the urge to do long burnouts. Neither tire works well after long burnouts.
__________________
1963 C-10: Deluxe-optioned cab, shortbed, fleetside Pontiac 462 ci, Kauffman D-Port alum. heads 4L80E, narrowed sheetmetal Ford 9-inch Tubular front and rear suspension Custom 6-piston front disc and 4-piston rear disc brakes |
|
|
|
|
06-24-2011, 07:42 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Account Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Plumas Lake, Ca.
Posts: 1,009
|
Re: MT vs BFG Drag Radial
Quote:
Especially the BFG's !!!! Last edited by blackedoutharley; 06-24-2011 at 07:43 PM. |
|
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
