The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-11-2011, 08:49 PM   #1
rbuckin111
Registered User
 
rbuckin111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 46
230 v 235

I am rather new to this whole thing so forgive if I ask a very basic question. I have a 64 GMC with a 230 straight six. I have seen some Chevy's from the same era with 235. Are these engines essentially identical except for 5 cu in? Why did they have two engines so close in cu in available? Were the 230s a product for GMC and the 235s a product for Chevy's? Will a 235 work in my GMC? I need to do a replacement and I have found a reasonably priced 235 in my area.

Thanks for any help you can give!
__________________
Lovin' my 64 GMC Fleetside Daily Driver
rbuckin111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2011, 09:03 PM   #2
awbrown
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Detroit MI
Posts: 1,209
Re: 230 v 235

a 64 would have been a definite 230/250 , the last year for the 235 in the truck was 62 but you may find other wise.. ... They are 2 different animals , this link has all the info you could want .. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chevrol...aight-6_engine They changed everything from the old 235 to the new 194,230,250 Bore and stroke , intergral behousing , cylinder head design, distributor location etc...
awbrown is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2011, 09:04 PM   #3
Gianyveedub
Registered User
 
Gianyveedub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hollister, Ca
Posts: 178
Re: 230 v 235

The engines are similar, but not the same. If you look at 1960-1962 c10s (235) with inline sixes, you will notice that the engine mounts for them are in the front (under the timing cover) and on the trans tunnel. For the 1963-66 c10s (230) the engine mounts are on the side of the engine as well as on the trans tunnel. I ran into the same problem when I blew the motor in my 1963 c10. The 230 had to be replaced and I found a 1962 235 motor to go in thinking it was the same.... well I hoped. I had to fabricate the engine mounts from a set of used engine mounts I had lying around. Second, I had to fabricate the throttle linkage in order to run the original arm. Thirdly The Clutch Z-bar mount had to be fabricated because the 1960-62 c10s used a hydraulic clutch not a Z-bar. I have never welded before this, so I said screw it I need this engine to work, so I set out and fabricated everything. If you are not afraid to make some things from scratch, go for it. I bought my motor for 200.00 bucks and 100.00 for a welder and about 50 or so dollars for the metal. Not bad considering the 1962 motor only had 30k miles on it. I'll take some photos and upload them later tonight to show you what I mean.
Gianyveedub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-11-2011, 11:19 PM   #4
Gianyveedub
Registered User
 
Gianyveedub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hollister, Ca
Posts: 178
Re: 230 v 235

Here are the photos.


This is a shot of the 235. If you compare this to the 230 you will notice a difference in the intake manifold design. Also I have a oil filter that attaches to the manifold, but the 230 design has a modern day oil filtration system that spins on to the engine where this 235 does not.


Here is the drivers side motor mount. The 235s mount has a different 3 hold spacing than that of the 230; that's the reason for the fabrication. I didnt want to stack washers to make the frame mounts fit, so I used them and just moved them forward and drilled new holes. That being said, I could no longer used the rubber mounts and had to make solid mount for between the frame and engine.


Here is the passenger side mounts


Another shot of the passenger side.


Here is the throttle bracket I made




Here is the plate i made to connect the Z-Bar


Gianyveedub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2011, 12:28 AM   #5
rbuckin111
Registered User
 
rbuckin111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 46
Re: 230 v 235

Thanks guys! Very helpful information. My assumptions would have gotten me into a lot of trouble. Gianyveedub, thanks for taking the extra time to post pics. They were very informative. For not being a welder, I think you did some awesome work!
__________________
Lovin' my 64 GMC Fleetside Daily Driver
rbuckin111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2011, 03:38 PM   #6
factorystock
Registered User
 
factorystock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: west coast
Posts: 3,359
Re: 230 v 235

Many people mistakingly call the Chevy 230 and 250 a 235. 235's (completely different) are very common in '62 and older pickups. A more difficult engine to indentify is the 230 Vs. 250 which look indentical. Check I.D. code on distributor pad to distinguish the 230 from the 250.These are all Chevy built engines, GMC offered the 230 Chevy as an ecomony option starting in '64.The 250 was new for '66 for both Chevy and GMC.
factorystock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2011, 10:28 PM   #7
rbuckin111
Registered User
 
rbuckin111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 46
Re: 230 v 235

From the information you guys have given me, I wonder if the seller of the engine is mistaken about the engine as he claims it is a 1966 235 out of a Bel Aire. When I compare it to the picture above of the 235, it appears to look more like my 230. Could this possibly be a 230 or 250 which are identical?

__________________
Lovin' my 64 GMC Fleetside Daily Driver
rbuckin111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-12-2011, 11:27 PM   #8
Gianyveedub
Registered User
 
Gianyveedub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hollister, Ca
Posts: 178
Re: 230 v 235

Ask the seller for the casting number and check it online to see if it is a 230 or 250. Good Luck Man.
Gianyveedub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 12:00 AM   #9
Captainfab
60-66 Nut

 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Coeur d'Alene, Idaho
Posts: 23,246
Re: 230 v 235

The engine in that pic certainly does look like a 230/250 to me. Like was already mentioned, many unknowing people don't know the differences between the 235 and 230/250. If it is the original engine out of a '66 Belair, then it is either a 230 or a 250.
__________________
Power Steering Box Adapter Plates For Sale HERE
Power Brake Booster Adapter Brackets For Sale '63-'66 HERE and '67-'72 HERE and '60-'62 HERE and "60-'62 with clutch HERE
Rear Disc Brake Brackets For Sale. Impala SS calipers HERE Camaro Calipers HERE D52 Calipers HERE 6 Lug HERE
Hydroboost Mounting Plates HERE
Captainfab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-13-2011, 08:28 AM   #10
rbuckin111
Registered User
 
rbuckin111's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 46
Re: 230 v 235

Thanks guys! The help is very much appreciated!
__________________
Lovin' my 64 GMC Fleetside Daily Driver
rbuckin111 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-04-2021, 01:17 PM   #11
scottmitchellrose
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: durham nc
Posts: 124
Re: 230 v 235

all I can tell you to add is- the 235 is bigger and heavier- MUCH - than the 230. I have one of each. I am amazed at the difference.
scottmitchellrose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2021, 11:11 AM   #12
vin63
It's Better With Nitro
 
vin63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Chino Hills, CA
Posts: 2,261
Re: 230 v 235

If you're really curious, the 216/235 inlines had 4 main crank bearings. The 194 - 292 generation of inlines had 7 main bearings.
__________________
1963 C-10: Deluxe-optioned cab, shortbed, fleetside
Pontiac 462 ci, Kauffman D-Port alum. heads
4L80E, narrowed sheetmetal Ford 9-inch
Tubular front and rear suspension
Custom 6-piston front disc and 4-piston rear disc brakes
vin63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2021, 12:48 PM   #13
scottmitchellrose
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: durham nc
Posts: 124
Re: 230 v 235

cool- no, i had no idea. I haven't opened up either one. But I now at least know from this thread that it's probably better to put that 235 in my 61's.
scottmitchellrose is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2021, 07:46 PM   #14
AcampoDave
Registered User
 
AcampoDave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: central California
Posts: 2,733
Re: 230 v 235

Did anyone mention that the bell housings are not interchangeable?
AcampoDave is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com