The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-12-2012, 09:26 PM   #1
tolly4503
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Columbiana, Ohio
Posts: 93
383 Cylinder Heads

I'm going to be starting to put together my 383 for my truck. I got everything pretty much figured out except the heads and cam. The cam I'll figure out when I decide on the rest of the build. I've heard alot about Vortec heads, and how they make good power, but since I'm buying them new, is there a better head for the money. This engine isnt for racing or high horsepower but I do wanna make good power. If I want to go high horsepower would it be better to just skip the vortecs.

Heres the heads Ive been looking at. Any thoughts?

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SUM-151124/

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SUM-152123/

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/NAL-12558060/
tolly4503 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 10:35 PM   #2
webfoot
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hermiston, OR
Posts: 947
Re: 383 Cylinder Heads

For a driver/cruiser I'd pick the 2nd ones, with the larger combustion chambers you'll be able to run regular octane fuel and have a more streetable cam selection. 64cc chambers puts you at about 10:1 cr assuming you have regular flat top pistons with 4 valve reliefs.
__________________
Running in place gets you nowhere fast.
-me
1968 GTO 4-spd covnvertible

1970 K-20 4-speed, factory AC.
webfoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 10:47 PM   #3
hugger6933
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Marianna Arkansas
Posts: 7,280
Re: 383 Cylinder Heads

The vortecs are worth 30 to 40 more hp than other small block heads. The fast burn vortecs [byGM performance parts] should be checked into by you for your build they are awesome!! Edelbrock makes a vortec type heads that are really good.
hugger6933 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2012, 10:54 PM   #4
tolly4503
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Columbiana, Ohio
Posts: 93
Re: 383 Cylinder Heads

I know they have bigger valves, but smaller intake runners, but would these really be that much better for power then the Vortecs. I know a lot of people like the vortecs, but for the price of heads I want to buy one set that I can use for now and if I go bigger in the future.

BTW anyone know what the factory HP/TQ rating of a '69 350 w/ a 4 BBL

Last edited by tolly4503; 01-12-2012 at 11:13 PM.
tolly4503 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 10:06 AM   #5
tolly4503
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Columbiana, Ohio
Posts: 93
Re: 383 Cylinder Heads

I found these heads that are still in my price range, they are kind of a combo of the vortec and other Summit heads I was looking at.

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/PAR-2151/

If I run a dished piston, I can get my comp. ratio to 9.6-9.7 area.
tolly4503 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 12:01 PM   #6
PanelDeland
I am a Referee of life.
 
PanelDeland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Greensboro N.C.
Posts: 13,992
Re: 383 Cylinder Heads

For about $200 more there are a lot of aftermarket aluminum heads that will get the job done.They will also allow higher com ratio with the same grade of fuel.I think the Vortecs are fine but by the time you have the machine work done to use a cam with more than 450 or so lift you will have nearly as much in them.JMHO
__________________
The 47-present Chevrolet and GMC Truck Message Board Network,it's owners,moderators,members,and associates of any type should not be held responsible for my opinion.
You can't fix stupid,not even with duct tape.
"My appearance is due to the fact that "GOD" does punish you for having too much fun!"
Barrett-Jackson has perfected alchemy,they make rust into gold!
"You can lead a horse to water but you can't saddle a duck"
"Cleverly disguised as a 'Responsible Adult'
"Sometimes your Knight in shining armor is just a retard in tinfoil"
PanelDeland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 12:50 PM   #7
tolly4503
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Columbiana, Ohio
Posts: 93
Re: 383 Cylinder Heads

Thanks for your input. Maybe I'm comfusing myslef but on Jegs site it says the patriot vortec have a max spring lift of .575, or am I thinking of something else.

http://www.jegs.com/i/Patriot-Perfor...ductId=1192214
tolly4503 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 01:46 PM   #8
webfoot
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hermiston, OR
Posts: 947
Re: 383 Cylinder Heads

Either their own casting or worked over, they also have screw in rocker arm studs which is part of what limits the lift on the factory ones as they are pressed in.

For a mild build you won't be anywhere near .575 lift. I would figure out the rest of your combo before you buy heads, it is easier to buy heads to suit your build than to design a build around a set of heads.
__________________
Running in place gets you nowhere fast.
-me
1968 GTO 4-spd covnvertible

1970 K-20 4-speed, factory AC.
webfoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 03:17 PM   #9
tolly4503
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Columbiana, Ohio
Posts: 93
Re: 383 Cylinder Heads

I think I've got most of the build figured out, I'm gonna go with a Scat rotating assembly like this one.

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SCA-1-90350/

Edelbrock vortech manifold, havent decided which one, and the cam I'm gonna wait til I figure out what gearing and that I'll end up with. As for the heads I'm just trying to find heads that will work for me without spending a fortune.
tolly4503 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 04:19 PM   #10
GRX
Registered User
 
GRX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: MD
Posts: 1,937
Re: 383 Cylinder Heads

Wow. I am amazed at the ever growing aftermarket of internal parts for these engines. A far cry from back in the day when I had to hunt junk yards with a bunch of tools & get grimy while avoiding angry bees & spiders.
__________________
1969 c-10 Step Side Long Bed. I-6 250cid = = 1969 Pontiac GTO hard top. 400, 4-speed.
GRX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 05:02 PM   #11
nobull2
Registered User
 
nobull2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: alpena ar
Posts: 134
Re: 383 Cylinder Heads

I am building one very close to that. 383 patriot heads and hyro roller cam hope to have it in the truck in a couple of weeks. Ill report on here.
nobull2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 05:57 PM   #12
webfoot
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hermiston, OR
Posts: 947
Re: 383 Cylinder Heads

I'd at least wait until you have the cam/gears picked out. If youre going to throw an RV cam in that thing then smaller runners and 72cc chambers will be good and then you don't really need the patriot units with the upgrades. If you are going to run a cam that likes a little more compression then you can run the smaller combustion chambers, and that will in turn determine if you need upgraded springs/rocker studs.

You need a head that suits the rest of your combo. a 383 is a 383 but a matched combination of parts will make good power on not a lot of $$.

I've got a 383 with flat tops on a stock bottom end with some good AFR heads and a voodoo hyd roller in my 70 chevelle and it takes it down the 1/8 mile in 8 flat.
__________________
Running in place gets you nowhere fast.
-me
1968 GTO 4-spd covnvertible

1970 K-20 4-speed, factory AC.

Last edited by webfoot; 01-13-2012 at 06:05 PM.
webfoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-13-2012, 08:00 PM   #13
tolly4503
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Columbiana, Ohio
Posts: 93
Re: 383 Cylinder Heads

Im goin with 3:73 or 4:10, leaning towards the 4:10s. I did the camquest thing. The cams they recommended me were close to these.

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CCA-12-210-2/

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/SUM-K00172/

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/CCA-12-211-2/

Do you see anything wrong with either of these?, and thank you for your patience and input.

Last edited by tolly4503; 01-13-2012 at 08:14 PM.
tolly4503 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com