The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-04-2012, 02:45 AM   #1
kikkegek
Registered User
 
kikkegek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Netherlands, The Hague
Posts: 1,518
Mileage versus rpm's

guys,

I have spent a lot time (and some money) optimizing my 350 to get the best mileage possible and still have a driveable vehicle.

see this topic on that:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=429908

the thing I noticed during this proces is that whatever improvement I get my mileage for 100% highway (long stretches) and our regular 50/50% city/highway daily driving always get the same mileage.

We always get around 8.2-8.7 mpg....

Now whenever I read a mpg topic people always seem to have a 10-30% better highway mileage then during their 50/50 driving.

My setup is:
- Suburban K20
- TH400 with 4.1 end gears
- 350 small block (original from 1986)
- all the smog stuff has come of
- no more gasoline carb, just the throttle plate
- propane setup: IMPCO 425 mixer on the throttle plate
- IMPCO E-type evaporator
- electric fan for cooling
- MSD 6AL connected to HEI dizzy with light springs for fast and flat curve (for propane)

what ever we do, highway mileage doesnt seem to improve compared to the 50/50 driving. I installed a tach and I noticed we do 3,000rpm when driving 90 km/h (which is slow on Dutch highways).

could the 3,000rpm be the cause? or are there guys over here that also do 3,000rpm's and still get better mileage on the highway?

please let me know
kikkegek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 02:56 AM   #2
gchemist
BAD BOW-Silverado XST
 
gchemist's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Senior Member from Austin, TX
Posts: 6,431
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

Ouch. Ideally, stock blocks like 1800-2200 RPMs as the cruise RPMs. Cam design is important.
__________________
Gerardo a.k.a. Mad Chemist
Silverado XST videos
gchemist is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 03:54 AM   #3
INSIDIOUS '86
Registered User
 
INSIDIOUS '86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: washington
Posts: 4,178
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

You need to ditch the th400 trans and go with a overdrive. That will bring highway mileage up a good amount. This is going to bring the best mileage gain. With the first gear ratio of the 700r4 being so high you can prolly go with 3.73 gears and gain a little more mileage.
Otherwise lower your rig for better aerodynamics
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
377 sbc thumpr cam autogear m23 muncie 3:73 Detroit trutrac
3''spintech prostreet mufflers xpipe 1 3/4 headers
build thread !http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=577217
Iroc gauge threadhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=554511
INSIDIOUS '86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 04:02 AM   #4
kikkegek
Registered User
 
kikkegek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Netherlands, The Hague
Posts: 1,518
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

@gchemist: thanks. I was afraid of that. It isnt really 3,000...usually its about 2,800rpm...but that is till high I guess...

@ Insidious: I know that will improve mileage and that will absolutely be the next step. But TH700R4 or 4L80E are a lot harder to get over here in the Netherlands. That is why I am trying to optimize my current setup and researching why our highway cruising isnt any better...

So I guess the rpm's during cruise are killin me...
kikkegek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 04:21 AM   #5
INSIDIOUS '86
Registered User
 
INSIDIOUS '86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: washington
Posts: 4,178
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

Yah Rpms are killing you. You can try lowering to gain some aerodynamics or even go so far as covering the bottom of your rig in flat sheet aluminum to make the bottom totally smooth.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
377 sbc thumpr cam autogear m23 muncie 3:73 Detroit trutrac
3''spintech prostreet mufflers xpipe 1 3/4 headers
build thread !http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=577217
Iroc gauge threadhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=554511
INSIDIOUS '86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 06:44 AM   #6
Stepper86
Registered User
 
Stepper86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 263
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

Plenty of 700r4 boxes around here in Sweden, I have one in my truck and I see them advertised on regular basis. I have trucks going to Denmark all most every week, so I could get it down there for you for nothing.
__________________
Tom.______________________________________
The fleet:
2007 BMW 530xi M (daily driver)
1986 C-10 Stepside (project "my time")
1992 Corvette cab (summer time daily driver)
1969 Cadilac DeVille Cab ("it just need some paint")
Stepper86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 06:46 AM   #7
kikkegek
Registered User
 
kikkegek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Netherlands, The Hague
Posts: 1,518
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stepper86 View Post
Plenty of 700r4 boxes around here in Sweden, I have one in my truck and I see them advertised on regular basis. I have trucks going to Denmark all most every week, so I could get it down there for you for nothing.
pm sent. thanks bud. Maybe you can help me.
kikkegek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 07:26 AM   #8
Goldfinger
Registered User
 
Goldfinger's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: laurel hill Fl
Posts: 645
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

Unfortunately about propane is that it's not as energy efficient and it will use more to keep you going. so in theory you should get less mpg. to get the engine at higher rpms it's sucking down more fuel. so the higher you are the more fuel you should burn. 700r4 will being them down do you really need 4.10 gears? a taller gear would help as well.
__________________
1985 C10 Custom Deluxe LWB 305/700r4 [ Goldfinger ]

1999 k3500 crew cab dually 6.5tdi/4l80e
Goldfinger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 09:46 AM   #9
Stepper86
Registered User
 
Stepper86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 263
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

Quote:
Originally Posted by kikkegek View Post
pm sent. thanks bud. Maybe you can help me.
Didnīt get any PM, try again.
__________________
Tom.______________________________________
The fleet:
2007 BMW 530xi M (daily driver)
1986 C-10 Stepside (project "my time")
1992 Corvette cab (summer time daily driver)
1969 Cadilac DeVille Cab ("it just need some paint")
Stepper86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 09:50 AM   #10
Dooley
Registered User
 
Dooley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: North Coast
Posts: 1,012
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

I had a 1983 K20 Suburban. Reading your threads make me appreciate it more now than when I owned it. I had the 350 engine/700 transmission,($650.00 option),/3.73 gears and 12-13 mpg was no problem. My wife got even better mileage than that as I have a heavy foot. I know that 3.73/4.10 were the only gears available for the 8600gvw Burbs that year.

What size tires are you running? With 4.10's you should have at least 255/85-16's on it if they are available. Simplest upgrade improvement.
The next upgrade I would get an overdrive transmission.

We upgraded a K5 Blazer to a 700 transmission and it gets 22-25 on the open highways with it's 6.2 diesel.
Dooley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 11:47 AM   #11
wilkin250r
Registered User
 
wilkin250r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Tahoe, Nevada
Posts: 755
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

90km/hr is right about 55mph. 2800 rpms is rather high for 55mph, is there any special reason for the 4.10 gearing? Do you tow often?

I would say a combination of both a gearing change and an overdrive transmission would benefit you tremendously, and there's absolutely nothing wrong with doing them separately.

Of the two, the gearing change sounds like it would be the easiest and cheapest to start with. I would say you could easily switch to a 3.73 ratio and still tow just fine, if you're only towing light loads or not towing often, you could even switch to a 3.42 ratio. If you almost never tow anything, you could go all the way to 3.08, which would drop your highway RPMs to around 2000 and possibly eliminate the need for an overdrive tranny at all (the drawback is that it would feel gutless)
__________________
I know a little about cars, but if you have a question about electricity or sport quads, I'm your man!!!
wilkin250r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 12:02 PM   #12
Corts60
Just here to tinker
 
Corts60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 3,689
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

I agree with all above. You need to keep the engine RPM's in the peak torque range about 1800-2200 during highway cruising if you want to see better mileage.
Corts60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 12:11 PM   #13
Dunenutt
Newbee
 
Dunenutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 1,406
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

If you don't want to get rid of the TH400, heres an option. I am going to put one in mine, as soon as I do some other things to it.

http://www.gearvendors.com/4x4gm3s.html
Dunenutt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 01:43 PM   #14
kikkegek
Registered User
 
kikkegek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Netherlands, The Hague
Posts: 1,518
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunenutt View Post
If you don't want to get rid of the TH400, heres an option. I am going to put one in mine, as soon as I do some other things to it.

http://www.gearvendors.com/4x4gm3s.html
thanks for the info:
so help me out here....I replace the transfer case by one of these baby's and instantly I go from 3 to 6 gears and my end gear goes from 4.1 down to 3.2?

If that is a plug-n-play installation and I can keep the rest of the car...then WOW!

just the 3000 bucks is a lot....
So do I get this right?
kikkegek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 01:57 PM   #15
wilkin250r
Registered User
 
wilkin250r's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Lake Tahoe, Nevada
Posts: 755
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

Quote:
Originally Posted by kikkegek View Post
thanks for the info:
so help me out here....I replace the transfer case by one of these baby's and instantly I go from 3 to 6 gears and my end gear goes from 4.1 down to 3.2?

If that is a plug-n-play installation and I can keep the rest of the car...then WOW!

just the 3000 bucks is a lot....
So do I get this right?
Close, you'll also need to change the rear driveshaft. And while that is definitely an option, it's also probably about twice the cost of regearing your axles.
__________________
I know a little about cars, but if you have a question about electricity or sport quads, I'm your man!!!
wilkin250r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 02:26 PM   #16
Dunenutt
Newbee
 
Dunenutt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 1,406
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

Quote:
Originally Posted by wilkin250r View Post
Close, you'll also need to change the rear driveshaft. And while that is definitely an option, it's also probably about twice the cost of regearing your axles.
True, but i want the low gears. In town stop and go,and off road,low is better. Kick in the od on the highway,and cruise. Plus the advantage of splitting gears.


To the op,its plug and play. Call them, they will talk your ear off, lol.
Posted via Mobile Device
Dunenutt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 02:45 PM   #17
kikkegek
Registered User
 
kikkegek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Netherlands, The Hague
Posts: 1,518
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dunenutt View Post
True, but i want the low gears. In town stop and go,and off road,low is better. Kick in the od on the highway,and cruise. Plus the advantage of splitting gears.


To the op,its plug and play. Call them, they will talk your ear off, lol.
Posted via Mobile Device
okay....but $3,000,-? is that correct?
kikkegek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-04-2012, 07:50 PM   #18
tucsonjwt
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,188
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

4:10 rear axle and 4 WD and 3/4 ton will kill gas mileage. I just took my 83 C20 4:10 SM 465 granny 4 speed on a 110 mile round trip highway ride and got 12 mpg. If I had engaged cruise and gear vendor (I did not because both were not working properly) I could have picked up 1-2 mpg. In the city I get anywhere between 8-11, depending if I have it loaded down with 3,000 lbs of junk on the way to the dump or not.
Having said all that, I think you should get 8-9 mpg city, maybe 10-11 highway with everything operating properly. I have no tachometer but I know that 4:10 is revving the engine way more than I would like.
A very light foot in the city will help. Anticipate stop lights ahead of time and take your foot off the gas - coast to a stop. Accelerate very slowly.
tucsonjwt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2012, 01:51 AM   #19
Corts60
Just here to tinker
 
Corts60's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Holland, MI
Posts: 3,689
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

Quote:
Originally Posted by kikkegek View Post
okay....but $3,000,-? is that correct?
yep. They're expensive. They are a very well built unit though. Some people say they are clunky and weird, but really, if you know how to shift them they are not. I have one in my truck behind a T400 and 3:73 gears. On the highway with a GV, my final drive ratio is 2:91. The combo of that ratio and having a diesel, I get 22 MPG consistently. It is really fun to bang through all 6 gears off the line (it takes some practice being able to shift everything smoothly).
Corts60 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2012, 02:34 AM   #20
kikkegek
Registered User
 
kikkegek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Netherlands, The Hague
Posts: 1,518
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

ok, checked it out, but $3,000 is not even taken into account the labor to put it in. Thats a too expensive upgrade for me. I'll never pay back that investment in mileage. I probabyl go down the road of the 4-gear 700R4 or something.

thanks everybody
kikkegek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2012, 06:05 AM   #21
cayoterun
Junior Member
 
cayoterun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Guymon, Oklahoma
Posts: 2,040
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

Quote:
Originally Posted by Goldfinger View Post
Unfortunately about propane is that it's not as energy efficient and it will use more to keep you going. so in theory you should get less mpg. to get the engine at higher rpms it's sucking down more fuel. so the higher you are the more fuel you should burn. 700r4 will being them down do you really need 4.10 gears? a taller gear would help as well.
Goldfinger is right, Where we live, Propane was used alot on farm tractors, trucks, and some cars, but propane is a colder fuel than gas. Rule of thumb here was propane would get 10% less mpg and 10% loss of power. A gain in power could be had raising the compression by using higher compression pistons, and milling the heads. That was only done during overhaul. Propane cost per gallon has risen so much in the last 25yrs, it no longer offers any savings over gasoline. I don't know what the cost comparison is on the late model factory equipt motors.
The Impco conversions are really good, simple, trouble free, and was the perferred choice.

How does the purchase price of propane compare to gasoline in your country? Just curious?
Cayoterun

I like propane for fuel, but no longer use it for that reason.
__________________
Cayoterun
Okla. Panhandle

I think I'll do it myself and pay the extra $500.
cayoterun is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2012, 06:28 AM   #22
kikkegek
Registered User
 
kikkegek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Netherlands, The Hague
Posts: 1,518
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

over here propane is less then half price of gasoline, so I dont really care about lossing 10% power and mileage..hahaha...

I was just curious why mi highway and city driving are equal in mileage. I guess my rpm's are killing mee..
kikkegek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2012, 08:10 AM   #23
tucsonjwt
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 3,188
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

Gear vendor advertises 20% improvement in fuel economy. I went from 9 city to 11 city mpg when I started using mine. I don't know if GV alone would account for 22 mpg - that is like 100% improvement in fuel economy.
tucsonjwt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2012, 08:26 AM   #24
BigBlocksRule
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Lubbock, TX
Posts: 2,047
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

If you have a way to get one from London to your location, I can get a 4L80E that far, I shop a bunch of blocks, etc. to a builder in London. I'm sure he wouldn't mind piggy backing a tranny in the next shipment...
BigBlocksRule is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-05-2012, 08:30 AM   #25
kikkegek
Registered User
 
kikkegek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Netherlands, The Hague
Posts: 1,518
Re: Mileage versus rpm's

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigBlocksRule View Post
If you have a way to get one from London to your location, I can get a 4L80E that far, I shop a bunch of blocks, etc. to a builder in London. I'm sure he wouldn't mind piggy backing a tranny in the next shipment...
a 4L80E would be supersweet...I just dont have a clue what else is involved to install it in our truck? I'll pm you...cause I think you do know this...
kikkegek is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com