The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1973 - 1987 Chevrolet & GMC Squarebody Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-07-2003, 05:22 PM   #1
TIMSPEED
 
TIMSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,321
What's better Air Induction: Open Element or Stock with a Duct?

Well, I have both an open element Chrome Air Cleaner, as well as the stock one. BUT, my stock one has been modified. I cut off that little plate that's on the inside of the round portion (I guess it's called a "air director", Swervin did the same mod), as well as cut out the guts for the Heat Choke Stove valve. Here's a pic with the current 3" Cold-Air duct.

Would that work better than just a normal open element cleaner, or would it work worse? I'm using a K&N Filter (fits both stock and open element)
__________________
I have a few cars...
See Them Here
TIMSPEED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2003, 06:27 PM   #2
PHOENIX
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 4,703
You have all kinds of stuff going on there!
I like the battery hold down

You would probly get slightly more air flow out of the open element, but it would be warmer air. I would stick with stock, but get a stock snorkel. They are cheap at your local dealer (brand new).
If I remember correctly I paid like $7-8 for a brand new snorkel.
I know for sure I did not pay over $12 for it.
__________________
* AVOID: LOPER'S PERMORANCE / LOPERSPEED.COM OF PHOENIX, AZ & COTTMAN TRANSMISSION *
PHOENIX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2003, 06:53 PM   #3
TIMSPEED
 
TIMSPEED's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 1,321
Quote:
Originally posted by PHOENIX
get a stock snorkel.
Why? You don't like my snorkel? It's a 3" tube with an adapter, I think it's MUCH better than stock. But what do you mean I have a lot going on there? LoL, the battery hold down has been there as long as I can remember, hey, IT WORKS!
__________________
I have a few cars...
See Them Here
TIMSPEED is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2003, 07:51 PM   #4
RockHQ
ROCKET POWER!
 
RockHQ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Finland, Europe
Posts: 509
Ever been in a crash with that truck? Probably not because you wouldn't use that string to hold the battery down. 'Tis just a friendly suggestion.

-Axle
__________________
What did i do last nite?
I had a wonderful time,
That's what they tell me
What did i do last nite?

1979 C-10 shortfleet: Olds 350, Th400, 12 bolt
Current project: 1969 Olds 455 W-30, needing a rebuild
RockHQ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2003, 09:34 PM   #5
1FaastC10
Account Suspended
 
1FaastC10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Elkhart, IN
Posts: 6,400
Quote:
Originally posted by RockHQ
Ever been in a crash with that truck? Probably not because you wouldn't use that string to hold the battery down. 'Tis just a friendly suggestion.

-Axle
Rock, my first 82 had the very same type of battery hold down, and i did crash it. battery never moved.
1FaastC10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2003, 10:06 PM   #6
TX_Mudder
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 126
Quote:
Originally posted by RockHQ
Ever been in a crash with that truck? Probably not because you wouldn't use that string to hold the battery down. 'Tis just a friendly suggestion.

-Axle
In my old 76 I had my battery tied down with bungees. I was bouncing around a little in a mud hole and the battery crashed into the fan. Neither the battery nor the fan did very well.
Getting cheap tie downs that BOLT in place is a good idea. What I used cost about $10 and can be found at most auto stores - just the two long bolts with wing nuts and a cross bar.

-- Mike
TX_Mudder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2003, 12:51 PM   #7
PHOENIX
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 4,703
Quote:
Originally posted by TIMSPEED

Why? You don't like my snorkel? It's a 3" tube with an adapter, I think it's MUCH better than stock. But what do you mean I have a lot going on there? LoL, the battery hold down has been there as long as I can remember, hey, IT WORKS!
Just givin you a hard time about the battery hold down and the air intake. No biggie

I just think the stock snorkels give a nice clean appearance.
They are black and dont attrack as much attention, thats all.

EDIT:
Speaking of crashes. A friend of mine had a similar hold down.
Hes a jack@$$ and decided that driving off road around the dirt field by the mall would be a blast. Which it was . Anyway his battery came loose some how and jumped into the fan. It was an optima battery. It destroyed one cell and the thing still worked fine, but didnt crank as well. One more reason to own an optima!
__________________
* AVOID: LOPER'S PERMORANCE / LOPERSPEED.COM OF PHOENIX, AZ & COTTMAN TRANSMISSION *

Last edited by PHOENIX; 05-08-2003 at 12:54 PM.
PHOENIX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2003, 04:15 PM   #8
Bill W
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Oregon
Posts: 229
Re: What's better Air Induction: Open Element or Stock with a Duct?

Quote:
Originally posted by TIMSPEED
Would that work better than just a normal open element cleaner, or would it work worse? I'm using a K&N Filter (fits both stock and open element)
The closed system with cold air intake will work much better. If you want more air then put another snorkle on the drivers side and add a tall air filter lid from a early to mid 80's chevy pickup and use a tall filter (twice the height of the standard filter). I put a taller filter lid and element in my 91 sububuran and the filter stays cleaner longer and costs exactly the same amount as the standard height filter.

Bill
Bill W is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2003, 04:20 PM   #9
rockman20
"The dude abides"
 
rockman20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 472
Nothing looks cooler then opening up the hood of a truck and seeing a massive, chrome, open element, filter under there. And nothing sounds cooler then an open element when the quad opens up and starts howling.

However, the cold air induction is better. Traveling down the highway you are getting a ram air effect plus you are not sucking in that hot engine bay air. Hence why muscle cars use the ram air hoods, the cowel induction, etc, etc.
__________________
RockMan

1993 Chevy Silverado C3500 1 ton dually
1994 Honda Civic
1969 Oldsmobile Cutlass S
1953 IH Farmall Super M
New to the fleet:
1992 Subaru Loyal
rockman20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2003, 07:52 PM   #10
swervin ervin
You get what you pay for
 
swervin ervin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Cherryville, NC
Posts: 4,798
I think this looks pretty cool too.

__________________
Mike

1985 Chevy C-10
swervin ervin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-09-2003, 02:11 AM   #11
lofat
Rollin' Member
 
lofat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Hayward, California
Posts: 240
Where did you pick that up Mike? I want one.
__________________
:: 1977 C10 cheyenne ::
:: 1973 new yorker brougham :: for sale - $1,500

lofat productions
lofat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:43 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com