The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1988 - 1998 GMT400 Chevy & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-01-2012, 12:39 AM   #1
hipasschev94
Registered User
 
hipasschev94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ramsey minnesota
Posts: 217
frame to frame

how close would the frame of a long box 4x4 73 to 87 full size chevy truck be to an 88 long box 4x4? i want to have a straight axle on my 88 but mostly everything to do it with the existing frame is to expensive plus my frame is junk, but i also want to run dual tanks on it cause im trying to build it vintage so im thinking of just swapping my body and motor over then just use the rest of the drive train thats there
__________________
<><JP><>
hipasschev94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 01:05 PM   #2
project 67 sub
Account Suspended
 
project 67 sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: san bernardino ca. everywhere
Posts: 3,938
Re: frame to frame

the frames are completey different, that being said the swap can still be done, it just wont be as easy cause it wont be a direct bolt in swap
Posted via Mobile Device
project 67 sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 01:29 PM   #3
hipasschev94
Registered User
 
hipasschev94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ramsey minnesota
Posts: 217
Re: frame to frame

i was assuming theyd be diffrent, what would i have to do to get the mounts to line up right?
__________________
<><JP><>
hipasschev94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 01:29 PM   #4
hipasschev94
Registered User
 
hipasschev94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ramsey minnesota
Posts: 217
Re: frame to frame

that wasnt being a smart ass sorry i just read it and it really sounds like it
__________________
<><JP><>
hipasschev94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 02:58 PM   #5
project 67 sub
Account Suspended
 
project 67 sub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: san bernardino ca. everywhere
Posts: 3,938
Re: frame to frame

its ok lol, didnt take it as you being a smart a$$ im not sure exactly what it would take to make it work. maybe move/change frame mounts, maybe make new ones idk, sorry i cant help more, i do know that at least the front half of the 88 frame is alot stronger than the earlier. the 73-87 frames are prone to craking and braking where the steering gear bolts up
project 67 sub is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 03:17 PM   #6
hipasschev94
Registered User
 
hipasschev94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ramsey minnesota
Posts: 217
Re: frame to frame

What i was thinking was that while I'm working on the new frame that is box it and cap it in key points to make it as strong as it could possibly be but still have some of the flex it needs. Would you happen to know of anyone in Minnesota that has a long box standard cab 4x4 frame with dual tanks and 1/2 axles for sale or trade for a reasonable price?
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
<><JP><>
hipasschev94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2012, 11:29 PM   #7
ChevLoRay
Old Skool Club
 
ChevLoRay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Benton, AR "The Heart of Arkansas"
Posts: 10,880
Re: frame to frame

What's the basis for such a swap? You must have a really good reason for asking the question. I know that with enough time and money, virutally anything is possible. My question is why? Help me understand.
__________________
Member Nr. 2770

'96 GMC Sportside; 4.3/SLT - Daily driven....constantly needs washed.

'69 C-10 SWB; 350/TH400 - in limbo

The older I get, the better I was.
ChevLoRay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 12:10 AM   #8
hipasschev94
Registered User
 
hipasschev94's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: ramsey minnesota
Posts: 217
Re: frame to frame

Well i have a 88 chevy but I'm building it as vintage as possible and i also prefer straight axle over ifs so to do the swap to the existing frame is about 800 for the swap kit then another 400 for the crossover steering then buy the axles seprate for another couple 100 then i could just buy the older frame be able to buy everything cheaper and get everything at once like frame axles dual tanks ect. I can't afford all that much so I'd rather do the work and have everything work better
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
<><JP><>
hipasschev94 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2012, 10:56 AM   #9
ChevLoRay
Old Skool Club
 
ChevLoRay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Benton, AR "The Heart of Arkansas"
Posts: 10,880
Re: frame to frame

Okay. I was just curious. Good luck.
__________________
Member Nr. 2770

'96 GMC Sportside; 4.3/SLT - Daily driven....constantly needs washed.

'69 C-10 SWB; 350/TH400 - in limbo

The older I get, the better I was.
ChevLoRay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2012, 08:34 PM   #10
bloertcher
Registered User
 
bloertcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Springfield,Mo.
Posts: 305
Re: frame to frame

Here's the skinny on the task your proposing.I did it close to ten years ago on a truck that I built for mudracing.
The 73-87 frame is right around 12" narrower than the later frame.I had to incorporate roughly 4" of body lift to get the body to set level and look "correct".
EVERY body mount,and even bed mounting point took a lot of fabricating,and being a race truck I didn't use body bushings.Nor did I have bumpers,which would open a whole nother' can of fabricating worms.
The dual tank thing,I've had a few dual tank square body Chevys,they ALL had issues.If the tank switch worked when I got the truck,it always had at least one issue before it was over.GM didn't do away with dual tanks and incorperate a large single tank because the dual tanks were so successful.Theres a lot of extra parts involved in dual tanks,and even the best parts fail.

Honestly,it is a doable swap,but it really isn't worth it.I had to brace the hell out of the frame,and build extra crossmembers,due to the "twisting" force that having such long "body mounts" on the frame gave.I wholeheartedly understand the swap kit being expensive.It shouldn't cost what it does,but they HAVE engineered it,and it is SAFE.
This is my advice,and worth just what it costs you,but if I were in your shoes,I would study anything I could find on straight axle swaps,caster and pinion angles,and steering solutions.If you can't swing the ORU kit,build it.I promise the results will be better and SAFER than swapping to the earlier frame.
__________________
RIP Baby Jack 2-06-07
See You On The Other Side My Little Man
bloertcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2012, 07:48 PM   #11
ChevLoRay
Old Skool Club
 
ChevLoRay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Benton, AR "The Heart of Arkansas"
Posts: 10,880
Re: frame to frame

Voice of Experience....
__________________
Member Nr. 2770

'96 GMC Sportside; 4.3/SLT - Daily driven....constantly needs washed.

'69 C-10 SWB; 350/TH400 - in limbo

The older I get, the better I was.
ChevLoRay is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com