|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
11-25-2012, 10:53 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,303
|
webber/holley 2bbl conversion
Has anyone ran the stoveboltengineco.com 2bbl electric choke webber/Holley conversion? I have a gently used set up and cant decide if I want to run it or the 390 Holley. I see Tom @ stoveboltengineco is out of them and cant find them. Makes me think they were popular and I shouldn't sell it?
|
|
|
|
11-26-2012, 01:02 AM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,303
|
Re: webber/holley 2bbl conversion
Forgot to mention, its adapted to run on a stock intake but I could also run it on the clifford
|
|
|
|
|
11-26-2012, 09:53 PM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auburn ca.
Posts: 2,886
|
Re: webber/holley 2bbl conversion
I am sort of the in the same spot. I did a bit of research and i came up with some numbers. the stock carter is roughly 277 cfm the webber 32/36 progressive= 299 cfm
and the 38/38 synchronous-opening =335. I base this on flange diamater. I have never had much luck with carb adaptors. i would lean towards the clifford. and keep the webber The clifford can take any of the above. The i like about the holley is it is so tuneable I dont know much about the webbers.just my $0.02 |
|
|
|
|
11-26-2012, 10:13 PM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 307
|
Re: webber/holley 2bbl conversion
The good thing about a Holley is it is infinitely tuneable.
The bad thing about a Holley is it is infinitely tunable. 
|
|
|
|
|
11-26-2012, 10:16 PM
|
#5 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auburn ca.
Posts: 2,886
|
Re: webber/holley 2bbl conversion
Quote:
 My sister used to be a good holley tuner.
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-26-2012, 10:53 PM
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 307
|
Re: webber/holley 2bbl conversion
Somebody would propose to your sister if they know she is a carburater queen
|
|
|
|
|
11-27-2012, 10:38 AM
|
#7 | |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auburn ca.
Posts: 2,886
|
Re: webber/holley 2bbl conversion
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
11-27-2012, 11:00 AM
|
#8 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auburn ca.
Posts: 2,886
|
Re: webber/holley 2bbl conversion
I am Lookin At the clifford with a webber 32/38 or a holley 39cfm. but tht idea of a offenhauser 3X1 with webber ICH 34s sounds interesting.
|
|
|
|
|
11-27-2012, 11:19 AM
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auburn ca.
Posts: 2,886
|
Re: webber/holley 2bbl conversion
|
|
|
|
|
11-27-2012, 12:00 PM
|
#10 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auburn ca.
Posts: 2,886
|
Re: webber/holley 2bbl conversion
Webber info. http://www.classicinlines.com/WeberDGV.asp#
|
|
|
|
|
12-11-2012, 06:56 PM
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 45
|
Re: webber/holley 2bbl conversion
Seriously considering this upgrade to my 250 (with old style *nonintegrated* 230 head/intake). Didn't realize it was even an option until someone mentioned it in my project thread while I was saying I wanted to go 4 bbl eventually. For around $250 for all the parts needed, sounds pretty awesome.
Any thoughts? Experiences?
__________________
CURRENT: '64 Stepside C10 Rat, 250ci Inline 6, 3 spd on Column (Thread) PAST: '67 C10 Stepside, '79 Sierra |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
