Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-05-2012, 02:39 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: the middle
Posts: 296
|
Could you weigh in on how this looks?
I want to put this...
in this... and it will look something like this... I already have the tank and yes it is massive. Inside is a working fuel pump which i need for my tbi 350 and a working sender. Ideally i could purchase a smaller custom tank but that would cost at least another 600 bucks. I plan to remove the spare tire crossmember and replace it with a reciever hitch at the very back of the frame. I plan to paint the tank black so it blends in a little better. Hopefully the reciever hitch will hide it a litte better too. The bumper may get tucked up a little tighter depending on what looks best. What do you guys think? Is it tolerable enough looking at least for a while? The tank will have about 7" of ground clearance which is couple inches more than my suspension travel and is just a bit above my scrub line. With all the extra cost for a different tank and pump, i would probably start looking at converting the tbi over to a carb and use a mechanical pump. Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
My Lost and Forgotten build thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=442712 |
12-05-2012, 02:58 PM | #2 |
Hollister Road Co.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 6,131
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
I would be worried about getting hit and cooking my truck rather than what it looks like.
|
12-05-2012, 03:04 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: the middle
Posts: 296
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
ok... its in the exact location it was in a 88 suburban, i just turned it sideways. Could you elaborate?
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
My Lost and Forgotten build thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=442712 |
12-05-2012, 03:14 PM | #4 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auburn ca.
Posts: 2,886
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
Quote:
Remember I said "I think" |
|
12-05-2012, 03:21 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auburn ca.
Posts: 2,886
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
you could pick and modify one of these brand new for about $100
http://www.clubfte.com/users/jniolon...ustangtank.htm |
12-05-2012, 03:24 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Motown
Posts: 7,680
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
a problem i see is that your still on springs and you would be removing the x-member that supports your rear spring hangers.
i did a rear tank on my 58 truk and moved the x-member back 6'' but also boxed the frame and made a heavier x-member and welded it. i also think it's hanging a little low, maybe raise your bed a couple inches to give yourself a little more clearance. move your shock support forward, box the frame and weld in a heavy x-member rearward to support your spring hangers. i wouldn't tow heavy trailers with the x-member moved back either or skip the hitch.
__________________
cool, an ogre smiley Ogre's 58 Truk build how to put your truck year and build thread into your signature shop air compressor timer |
12-05-2012, 03:32 PM | #7 | |
Hollister Road Co.
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Houston
Posts: 6,131
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
Quote:
http://t0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...XcC1R_iZWLvWMG Its much higher that yours with a crossmember behind it not exposed. You can barely see the tank on this one http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:A...1HcdWcQvfjFiLw |
|
12-05-2012, 03:43 PM | #8 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: the middle
Posts: 296
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
Quote:
Either like this... or up higher directly between the frame rails.
__________________
My Lost and Forgotten build thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=442712 |
|
12-05-2012, 03:46 PM | #9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: the middle
Posts: 296
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
Quote:
Thanks for the help so far!
__________________
My Lost and Forgotten build thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=442712 |
|
12-05-2012, 03:48 PM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: LBK,TX
Posts: 14
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
Not to be rude but it looks way off; to be able to see that much of the tank. Your going to make the truck look like a duck! I say no way. Unless you section the tank and make it shallow or wedge the tank (make the tank shallow in the rear and not so much in the front) then maybe but still gonna see a lot of the tank.
|
12-05-2012, 03:55 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: the middle
Posts: 296
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
Any suggestions for a stock replacement tank from another vehicle? I need to be able to run an in tank pump for tbi (low pressure). This tank is like 30 gallons from a suburban, maybe the trucks had shallower tanks.
__________________
My Lost and Forgotten build thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=442712 |
12-05-2012, 04:04 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 8,800
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
Most people looking at it will think it was not well thought out. I had the same internal discussion with mine (need for more gallons vs. having it hanging down). I opted for a 16 gallon and will add another in the bed with the toolbox later. I sense you are uncomfortable with it and it could become something that everytime you look at your truck you will think "I should have done it differently" and will end up changing it out. Others have given cost effective alternatives, you can sell what you have to offset the cost. My tank and sender were less than $300.
__________________
1959 Chevy Short Fleetside w/ 74 4WD drive train (current project) OrrieG Build Thread 1964 Chevelle Malibu w/ 355-350TH (daily driver) Helpful AD and TF Manual Site Old Car Manual Project |
12-06-2012, 10:26 AM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winder, GA
Posts: 274
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
You're effectively turning your AD into a Pinto
|
12-06-2012, 10:40 AM | #14 |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: phx, az
Posts: 868
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
|
12-06-2012, 11:05 AM | #15 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auburn ca.
Posts: 2,886
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
But what if somthing hits it from the bottom? there are some times that you can't avoid road debris!
|
12-06-2012, 11:13 AM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Auburn ca.
Posts: 2,886
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
In a way I agree. It wouldnt be any fun to burn to death!
Or worse servive and have famaly not! |
12-06-2012, 12:33 PM | #17 |
and a few others
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Blue Ridge Mountains of VA
Posts: 5,638
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
What about a tank out of a 2.8 S-10? Side mount fill tube. Mounted in front of the rear axle. The tanks out of a 2.8 are a little smaller than the 4.3 and they have a kick-down step (top side) to allow it to go under the cab a little in the front.
__________________
Bill US Army Vet -193rd Infantry BlueRidgeMuscleCars.com “The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated” Gandhi |
12-06-2012, 01:06 PM | #18 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: the middle
Posts: 296
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
Quote:
Think about all the guys running mustang tanks in ads and tf trucks with just a rollpan and no bumper The tank does tuck up behind the diferential. I had considered making a skid plate though. In the end i want it to be safe and do appreciate your input. Comments like the pinto ones are not helpful and really pretty silly. Im thick skinned and did ask for opinions though. Troll away! I picked up a reviever hitch today out of storage for a little mock up to see how it will look and function Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
My Lost and Forgotten build thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=442712 |
|
12-06-2012, 01:10 PM | #19 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: the middle
Posts: 296
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
Quote:
The mustang tanks arent baffled and have no provisions for an in tank pump and then you have to cut another hole for a gm sender. Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
My Lost and Forgotten build thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=442712 |
|
12-06-2012, 01:24 PM | #20 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Sherwood park, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 91
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
from the looks of the pictures you have a shop thats well stocked with with tools, have you thought about making your own tank??
__________________
1948 Chevy 305, NV3500, 3.73 rear, sitting on a 95 s10 frame. Still in the works 2000 Chevy Extreme lowrider, 4.3, NV3500, 3.08 rear, upgraded/modded 2001 GMC Sonoma Zr2, 4.3, NV3500, Stock |
12-06-2012, 05:31 PM | #21 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: the middle
Posts: 296
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
Test fitting didn't go so well today. It was not a matter of could i do it, it just didn't all fit how i would have liked. In the end i just don't think i will be happy and end up having to redo it down the road.
So I am looking into my other options Needing a baffled tank that can support an in tank tbi appropriate fuel pump really limits my choices. Did find one promising lead i am researching it looks like i can pick up an 88 s10 blazer tank and sender/pump from rockauto for about 150 plus shipping. This tank and pump would have gone in a 4.3 tbi blazer, so i believe it would work with my 350 just fine... Need to do some more measuring... 33" x 22" x 10 1/2"
__________________
My Lost and Forgotten build thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=442712 |
12-06-2012, 06:02 PM | #22 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Muskogee, OK
Posts: 49
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
It's not totally in there yet but I have a plastic s10 truck tank in front of the axle tank for mine that links like it will fit very well. 18 ISh gallons and I'm planning for e10 crappy gas in an 07 5.3. I hope to get it mounted this weekend. I'll update if I get it done.
The metal TBI tanks I looked at had very similar size and shape to the plastic one I got. TBI pressure reg is in throttle body and pumps are 40 bucks. So any TBI tank should be made to work. Used metal s10 tanks are $35 at my scrap yard of choice. 4 door s10 tanks didn't look very usable to me for my truck. The ones I saw we're pretty long. Another thought on the k5 blazer tank. My k5 has an approximately 1/8th inch skid plate from the factory. That would be an option if keep the tank you have. Posted via Mobile Device |
12-06-2012, 06:32 PM | #23 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: the middle
Posts: 296
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
Thanks k5, i appreciate the input on the tbi. Im trying to slf teach myself about fuel injection along with alot of other things.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
My Lost and Forgotten build thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=442712 |
12-06-2012, 08:17 PM | #24 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: east tennessee
Posts: 158
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
Just got finished using 93 2door s10 blazer tank in my AD. The same as in your picture, using the pump from an avalanvhe to match my 5.3. Works good.
|
12-06-2012, 09:46 PM | #25 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winder, GA
Posts: 274
|
Re: Could you weigh in on how this looks?
Really? The only reason I don't have alot of posts is because I just got my truck, I'm not in a position to work on it yet (that will hopefully change ove the Christmas break), and I'm finding my way around this new site... but I'm sure glad that I could give you an opportunity to bump up your thread count with that witty and creative retort. Now, PursueSD- If you hang your tank that low and that far back, you seriously run the risk of puncture, fire, and/or explosion. |
Bookmarks |
|
|