|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-15-2013, 06:11 AM
|
#1 |
|
Zero Albedo
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Gabriel, California
Posts: 478
|
Any reason to not use driver side drop?
Researching converting my 65 GMC 1 ton panel to 4wd.
133" wheelbase-I can run a divorced transfer case, correct? Any reason to not gather a driver drop np205 and high pinion Dana 60? I'd be using the truck as a back country camper. Thanks for any help-still trying to wrap my brain around this 4x4 stuff. Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
Baz "Deserve's got nothin' to do with it." 66 GMC 1500 wideside longbed 250 4spd "Project Rekker"http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=467467 65 GMC 1Ton Panelhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...32#post4794432 65 Chevy Panel (former U.S.Navy truck) 64 Chevy Suburban Carryall 4x4http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=358348 64 GMC 1000 wideside longbed 305 4spdhttp://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s....php?p=3600890(Rip- parts truck now) 68 Dodge Charger |
|
|
|
01-15-2013, 06:50 AM
|
#2 |
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Binghamton, NY
Posts: 3,469
|
Re: Any reason to not use driver side drop?
If you can find a 78/79 Ford high pinion 60 in your area go for it. Even out here they are still expensive.
__________________
2000 GMC CCSB 454/4L80 6” lift SAS 1999 Chevy CCSB 454/NV4500 4” SAS 1999 GMC Yukon 350/4L60 6" SAS |
|
|
|
|
01-15-2013, 02:25 PM
|
#3 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Idaho
Posts: 8,800
|
Re: Any reason to not use driver side drop?
Might be conflicts with clutch and brake stuff if you have that frame mounted? I think the fords used hydralic clutch operation to get the linkage out of the way???
__________________
1959 Chevy Short Fleetside w/ 74 4WD drive train (current project) OrrieG Build Thread 1964 Chevelle Malibu w/ 355-350TH (daily driver) Helpful AD and TF Manual Site Old Car Manual Project |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
