Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-22-2013, 09:59 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sumner, IA
Posts: 213
|
Q: on Manual Clutch Assembly
I'm running into an issue installing a hydraulic throwout bearing for a stock application into my chassis. I'm measuring about 1/4" interferrence fit between the clutch fingers, throwout bearing and the transmission.
Since this truck has a questionable history (very cobbled together over time), I do not know what friction plate/pressure plate combination is in it. Would a heavy duty pressure plate be thicker than stock? Is there a visual way to tell the difference between stock and heavy duty pressure plate with the cast bell housing installed and the dust shield removed? Thanks in advance for your help.
__________________
James "Bierkan" Vierkant 1950 3100 on a 1972 C10 Chassis Truck Blog Motorcycle Blog |
01-22-2013, 11:08 AM | #2 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Muskegon,MI,USA
Posts: 6,026
|
Re: Q: on Manual Clutch Assembly
Stock throwout bearings came in two different lengths to match the clutch. If you clutch took the shorter throwout bearing that could be the problem.
Jim
__________________
1971 Shortbox step side 4x4, 350 sbc, 3:07 rear end 1965 Impala SS 400 sbc, Muncie rock crusher 1966 Impala SS 396 bbc, TH 400 1969 El Camino, 350 sbc, TH 350 1971 Snowplow built on a Blazer frame 1972 GMC Short bed, stepside, TH 400, 427 BBC |
01-22-2013, 11:27 AM | #3 |
The Older Generation
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montezuma, Iowa
Posts: 25,818
|
Re: Q: on Manual Clutch Assembly
There are basically two different pressure plate configurations, diaphragm & Borg & Beck. If I remember correctly the diaphragm takes the long throwout bearing and the Borg & Beck takes the short one. Here is some info.
http://www.ramclutches.com/clutch%20u/cl_u_2.htm Here is another from Car Craft Mag. http://www.carcraft.com/techarticles...s/viewall.html LockDoc
__________________
Leon Locksmith, Specializing In Antique Trucks, Automobiles, & Motorcycles (My Dually Pickup Project Thread) http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=829820 - |
01-22-2013, 12:02 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sumner, IA
Posts: 213
|
Re: Q: on Manual Clutch Assembly
Mine is a diaphram style.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
James "Bierkan" Vierkant 1950 3100 on a 1972 C10 Chassis Truck Blog Motorcycle Blog |
01-22-2013, 01:35 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bowser
Posts: 13,736
|
Re: Q: on Manual Clutch Assembly
Diaphram style came in raised finger and flat finger. Raised gets the shorter TOB.
FWIW there are 4 kinds of pressure plates. Borg and beck, diapram, long and long/borg&beck. |
01-22-2013, 03:03 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sumner, IA
Posts: 213
|
Re: Q: on Manual Clutch Assembly
I believe it's a raised finger diaphram style. Is there differences in the raised finger style regarding "height" of the fingers?
__________________
James "Bierkan" Vierkant 1950 3100 on a 1972 C10 Chassis Truck Blog Motorcycle Blog |
01-22-2013, 03:13 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bowser
Posts: 13,736
|
Re: Q: on Manual Clutch Assembly
Not that I've seen.
|
01-22-2013, 03:29 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sumner, IA
Posts: 213
|
Re: Q: on Manual Clutch Assembly
Alrighty then. Looks like I'm returning a hto and finding something different.
Posted via Mobile Device
__________________
James "Bierkan" Vierkant 1950 3100 on a 1972 C10 Chassis Truck Blog Motorcycle Blog |
Bookmarks |
|
|