The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 03-31-2013, 04:28 PM   #1
biohazardbill
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Forsyth, Ga
Posts: 1,012
67-8 Flexible brake line hose, bagged truck

I went to Summit the other day and was speaking with one of the reps. We ended up getting SS brake line hoses and fittings however they were not specific for the truck. It takes the existing fittings (hard line and caliper and changes them to -4 an. Then the lines themselves are -4 an Lines. The problem is it appears that upon turning the lines will rub the bags... not a good thing.

So I need to take these back but wondering what you guys have used. I know some years have the hard line tab on the front of the crossmember however mine are on the rear. Part numbers would be awesome.

Thanks in advance... getting rid of some of these small issues and I will be driving soon.
biohazardbill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2013, 04:53 PM   #2
GASoline71
"I ain't nobody, dork."
 
GASoline71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,930
Re: 67-8 Flexible brake line hose, bagged truck

I've never set up a bagged truck. But do you need a longer than stock rear brake line? I got a stock rear brake line from the local parts store. If I wanted braided SS, they had those too. Direct bolt in.

Did you try Inline Tube, or one of the other aftermarket brake line manufacturers?

Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars...

My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread.

The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck

Quote:
Originally Posted by LONGHAIR View Post
I would never rebuild a 305.
Quote:
Originally Posted by prostreetC-10 View Post
I love using vacuum gauges as part of the carb tuning process. I hook the gauge to the inside of my garbage can and leave it there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv D View Post
Remember Murphys 2nd law of mechanical relationships... "OPPOSING COMPONENTS ATTEMPTING TO OCCUPY THE SAME SPACE, AT THE SAME TIME, GENERALLY END UP OCCUPYING ADJOINING SPACE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OIL PAN"
Quote:
Originally Posted by cableguy0 View Post
Its cheaper to listen to advice given when you ask for help than it is to ignore everyone and wait for carnage.
GASoline71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2013, 06:01 PM   #3
cdowns
Senior Member
 
cdowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: daytonabeach
Posts: 22,956
Re: 67-8 Flexible brake line hose, bagged truck

i would think if you have a tab on the back but need one on the front it would make sence to move it or hire a fabricator to do it
__________________
71c-10 350/2004r/4:11 lowered3/4 longbed/dead by hurricane

MEANING OF DEATH::::: SOMEBODY ELSE GETS YOUR STUFF

DONT BELIEVE EVERYTHING YOU THINK

TAKE MY ADVISE;I DON'T USE IT ANYWAY
cdowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2014, 02:27 PM   #4
Billett
Registered User
 
Billett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pittsgrove, NJ
Posts: 1,502
Re: 67-8 Flexible brake line hose, bagged truck

Gary, Any chance you have a part number on those rear brake lines?
__________________
Will
1968 C10 - Project Texa Go 6.0/4L80e
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
2002 Ford Excursion 7.3L
2024 Toyota Sienna
Billett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2014, 02:39 PM   #5
2 Far Gone
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Smithville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 92
Re: 67-8 Flexible brake line hose, bagged truck

Instead of keeping the flex line in the traditional location, why not get a regular SS flex line and move it to the front of the trailing arm. Then run hard lines back from that point to the axle and split it off to each wheel cylinder.
Perhaps stop following traditional thinking, check off road applications. A rock crawler has large amount of travel in the suspension. 4-6 inches of up travel is really what you're looking at.

Here's what i mean....


__________________
My Build Thread:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=611571

Last edited by 2 Far Gone; 03-09-2014 at 03:00 PM.
2 Far Gone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2014, 03:09 PM   #6
Billett
Registered User
 
Billett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pittsgrove, NJ
Posts: 1,502
Re: 67-8 Flexible brake line hose, bagged truck

Not sure I follow. Whats the difference between running the hard line there as opposed to a flex line from the frame. Seems like a lot more work for the exact same thing and you still end up using the same parts.

Perhaps I need my DD to drive to work tomorrow so traditional thinking will get it done today.
__________________
Will
1968 C10 - Project Texa Go 6.0/4L80e
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
2002 Ford Excursion 7.3L
2024 Toyota Sienna
Billett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2014, 05:23 PM   #7
2 Far Gone
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Smithville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 92
Re: 67-8 Flexible brake line hose, bagged truck

I thought you had a problem with the length of the rear flex line, not being long enough.
I ran stock lines when I lowered mine and limited the upward travel.

By "traditional thinking" I met stock. Not trying to offend anyone. I'm sorry if I did.
__________________
My Build Thread:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=611571

Last edited by 2 Far Gone; 03-09-2014 at 05:49 PM.
2 Far Gone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-09-2014, 11:57 PM   #8
Billett
Registered User
 
Billett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pittsgrove, NJ
Posts: 1,502
Re: 67-8 Flexible brake line hose, bagged truck

No no, not at all. I just needed the part number for the hose itself to make sure I had the right one. I didn't mean to sound so rude, I bought and installed all new shoes, drums and hardware, (which did need to be replaced anyway), but the hose seems to be the one thing keeping my brakes from working properly...

I can definitely see how running the line up the trailing arm first would help give some more freedom to the flex line in a lowered or raised application. Mine is pretty stock suspension wise though haha
__________________
Will
1968 C10 - Project Texa Go 6.0/4L80e
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
2002 Ford Excursion 7.3L
2024 Toyota Sienna
Billett is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2014, 08:07 PM   #9
2 Far Gone
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Smithville, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 92
Re: 67-8 Flexible brake line hose, bagged truck

Did you get it worked out?
__________________
My Build Thread:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=611571
2 Far Gone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2014, 09:29 AM   #10
Billett
Registered User
 
Billett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Pittsgrove, NJ
Posts: 1,502
Re: 67-8 Flexible brake line hose, bagged truck

I bought part number H36959 from Advance yesterday, but can't put it on until later tonight. Don't see why it wouldn't work and it looks right but I'll be sure to let you guys know.
__________________
Will
1968 C10 - Project Texa Go 6.0/4L80e
2003 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution
2002 Ford Excursion 7.3L
2024 Toyota Sienna
Billett is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com