The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-15-2003, 07:02 AM   #1
onetoncrewcab
One of my kids. Cute eh?
 
onetoncrewcab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Mitchell, SD
Posts: 1,286
one piece or two piece driveshaft

OK. I know this has been hashed on the board a few times, but I can't remember what the advice has been regarding going with a one piece or two piece driveshaft. And with seach down....well here is the question again.

I'm putting a 700R4 trans in the 70 Chev pickup. It has a two piece driveshaft now. Should I have that one modified or switch it over to a one piece?

I have the driveshaft out of the 85 Sub that I used for a engine/trans donor. Is this driveshaft going to be long enough to use for a start? I'm guessing it is going to be too short.

Thanks for the advice so far on this project!
Mike
__________________
If a kid asks where rain comes from, I think a cute thing to tell him is “God is crying.” And if he asks why God is crying, another cute thing to tell him is “Probably because of something you did.

John 3:16
2006 Chevy HHR
2000 Dodge Durango
1985 Jeep CJ-7
1970 Chevy Pickup
onetoncrewcab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2003, 08:25 AM   #2
lukecp
Formerly yellow72custom
 
lukecp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 7,531
A one piece will prevent carrier bearing failiure, since you won't have a carrier bearing, lol. And, next time you replace U-joints, you will only have 2 instead of 3, which will save alot of hassle.

It will cost more to have a 1 piece made than shortening the 2 piece. If you don't want to spend the extra money, get your current shaft shortned, install good-quality U-joints and a carrier bearing, and it should last quite a while before needing attention again.
__________________
'72 Chevy C10 Mild 350/TH350/3.07. Ochre/White. Old high school ride.
'70 GMC C2500 '62 327 4bbl/SM465/4.56-geared Dana 60. White/White. Project or parts truck.
'97 Saturn SL DD. 1.9/5-speed. 40+ highway mpg
lukecp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2003, 01:28 PM   #3
Wreck
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Paris, TX
Posts: 60
or these...


http://www.iedls.com/bearings.html

http://www.iedls.com/twopiece.html
Wreck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2003, 02:02 PM   #4
SuperCheyenne72
Registered User
 
SuperCheyenne72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Dallas, TX USA
Posts: 80
Question I have a question too...

I apologize also if this has been covered before, but since we're on the subject...

Does anyone know if there is any power gain or performance difference between the 1 pc. and 2 pc. drive shafts? I always assumed the single shaft was stronger since it didn't have to go through a carrier bearing, But that the 2 pc. was more economical since it spins on a less stressful axis. In other words, the 1 pc shafts are more likely to develop vibration and balance problems.

Am I on to something in this line of thinking, or is it all just a myth?
__________________
'72 Super Cheyenne LWB
  • 350 V8 w/ TH400
  • MSD Pro Billet HEI Dist. w/ Splitfire plugs
  • Edelbrock Performer Intake Manifold and dual exhuast glasspaks
  • Edelbrock Performer 750 cfm
SuperCheyenne72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2003, 04:09 PM   #5
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
The main problem with a one piece shaft is they length. Most places will refuse to make a shaft over 6 foot long, and some of the shops who do it...shouldn't
Basicly, the shaft gets too long to support its own weight, and it starts to 'whip' as it spins.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2003, 06:38 PM   #6
onetoncrewcab
One of my kids. Cute eh?
 
onetoncrewcab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Mitchell, SD
Posts: 1,286
Longhornmail,
Any idea how long the drive shaft would be with the 700R4 installed? It is going to be a couple of weeks before I have the engine and trans installed, but would like to try to reach a decision before then. Right now, I'm leaning to keeping the two piece. Looks like it could be less hassle.

Any idea if the Sub driveshaft would be long enough for a start point on a one piece?
Thanks
Mike
__________________
If a kid asks where rain comes from, I think a cute thing to tell him is “God is crying.” And if he asks why God is crying, another cute thing to tell him is “Probably because of something you did.

John 3:16
2006 Chevy HHR
2000 Dodge Durango
1985 Jeep CJ-7
1970 Chevy Pickup
onetoncrewcab is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2003, 07:25 PM   #7
neonlarry
Registered User
 
neonlarry's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Vacaville, CA
Posts: 2,746
Probably the best place to start would be to measure the length of your current trans and your new 700R4. That will give you a fair idea how much shorter your drive shafts will have to be. As for using the burb shaft I don't know the length but unless its over 4" in dia. I wouldn't consider using it for the reasons Andy stated.
__________________
70 C/10 Light Red 350/TH350, HEI, Duals w/40 series Flows, 91 seat, LED taillights
99 Pontiac S/C GTP, SLP Ram Air hood, GMPP Konis & springs
95 Neon ACR, MP PCM, AFX UDP, 3.0 CAI
neonlarry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2003, 07:32 PM   #8
67Fleetsidedream
Wiseass secured himself a BAN
 
67Fleetsidedream's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: MOON!!!
Posts: 2,282
I have 2 piece and have never had a problem. Stay with the 2 piece.
67Fleetsidedream is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2003, 07:46 PM   #9
bigjimzlll
Senior Member
 
bigjimzlll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Redding,CA...USA
Posts: 4,736
i have a 2 piece on my low 12 second truck
__________________
It's called "drag racing" if they called it "tic..tic..WHAM!..BANG! F*&K!!!", they'd have to keep the magazines under the counter with the other men's publications

click the clicky to join the site....
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/payments.php


67 lwb..first hotrod in 25 years..540 best ET is 9.45 @ 141.44
Anderson,CA
bigjimzlll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2003, 07:54 PM   #10
Blue68
Registered User
 
Blue68's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Frisco, Tx, USA
Posts: 606
This may only hold so much water, but I figure if the technology is still good enough for the newest trucks on the market, it is okay for my 34 yr old truck.
__________________
http://home.comcast.net/~r.landrum/w...tos.html-.html

'68 C-10 LWB, '98 Z-71 350 w/accessories (Serpentine), Edelbrock Performer, Edelbrock 1405 (600cfm) carb, GM HEI, CompCam Extreme 4x4 roller cam, Thorley Headers, Carter Electric Fuel Pump, Vintage Air, 700r4, 3.73, disc brakes and power steering upgrades.
Blue68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2003, 11:07 PM   #11
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
I am unable to tell you...I haven't seen my tranny coparison sheet in ages.
Sorry.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com