The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-10-2013, 01:12 PM   #1
Ralph (1970 GMC)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 26
Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

I'm shopping for new Ball Joints & Tie Rods for my 1970 GMC (1/2 ton step side). I've heard a lot of good things about RockAuto Parts, but am confused about whether to buy Moog (Problem Solver) or Raybestos (Professional Grade). Which one is better and are they both made in the USA ? Any advice on those parts and your wxperience with RockAuto Parts is greatly appreciated.
Ralph (1970 GMC) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2013, 01:29 PM   #2
67ctener
Registered User
 
67ctener's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Arlington Washington
Posts: 1,808
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

I ordered a COMPLETE front end raybestos kit through early classic enterprises. Seems like nice quality to me but haven't had the truck on the road. They offer great prices on complete kits. I also have friends that only run all moog but have no reason why they prefer one over the other.
67ctener is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2013, 01:53 PM   #3
Zeke's Garage
Senior Member
 
Zeke's Garage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 288
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

Between the two, I would choose Moog, but either of those are better than any of the China or India made stuff.
__________________
--
'67 Chevy Stepside
250 Inline 6
Megasquirt Fuel Injection
T5 5 speed conversion
Ferric Oxide impregnation throughout
Zeke's Garage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2013, 02:04 PM   #4
D.PASSMORE
One of the First
 
D.PASSMORE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: St. Augustine,FL.
Posts: 4,059
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

Intresting read:

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=497202
D.PASSMORE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2013, 02:16 PM   #5
Drewski23
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 142
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

here bros

http://www.moog-suspension-parts.com...PackageDeal119
Drewski23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2013, 04:07 PM   #6
Zeke's Garage
Senior Member
 
Zeke's Garage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Kennesaw, GA
Posts: 288
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

Ah well duped again.. tough to stay on top of the global market.
__________________
--
'67 Chevy Stepside
250 Inline 6
Megasquirt Fuel Injection
T5 5 speed conversion
Ferric Oxide impregnation throughout
Zeke's Garage is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2013, 04:30 PM   #7
motorcritter
Registered User
 
motorcritter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Boulder, CO
Posts: 350
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

It's not just Chinese stuff. When the Germanys reunited, there was a lot of Weat German sources stuff (usually electrical) that got made in plants moved to the former East Germany. Some other German made stuff got sources in other Eastern Bloc countries and quality control plummeted. The Chinese (and other not-first-world manufacturers) stuff has gotten better, but its not up to where quality (overall) used to be. It used to be you could count on a replacement part to fit and/or work- now, not so much.
__________________
If 'that which does not kill me, makes me stronger', then I should be Superman by now!
motorcritter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2013, 05:34 PM   #8
tony58
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Orange, Calif
Posts: 183
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

Moog can be from many countries. The advantage to Moog regardless if it's Chinese or not is they (Moog) ensure their products meet minimum quality levels, unlike small companies that don't care about quality.
tony58 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2013, 06:03 PM   #9
leddzepp
Moderator
 
leddzepp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern Cal
Posts: 20,031
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

Buy from a local store. Check the house brand, oftentimes it is re boxed Moog.
__________________
1972 C/10 Cheyenne Super SWB. Restored, loaded, slammed.

1968 C/10 50th Anniversary LWB. Unrestored, stock, daily driver/work truck.


RIP ElJay
RIP 67ChevyRedneck
RIP Grumpy Old Man
RIP FleetsidePaul
leddzepp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2013, 06:17 PM   #10
Jahloha
Registered User
 
Jahloha's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 526
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

Quote:
Originally Posted by leddzepp View Post
Buy from a local store. Check the house brand, oftentimes it is re boxed Moog.
Ledd:

Local store like Napa or something?
__________________
-JASON

My grandpa, Gramps, won a 1970 C20 in 1969 for $1. I'm on a mission to restore it before he passes.

My 1970 C20 Build Thread
Jahloha is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2013, 06:34 PM   #11
leddzepp
Moderator
 
leddzepp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Southern Cal
Posts: 20,031
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

Napa, CarQuest, etc. I bought mine from Star Auto, put side by side with Moog and they were identical
__________________
1972 C/10 Cheyenne Super SWB. Restored, loaded, slammed.

1968 C/10 50th Anniversary LWB. Unrestored, stock, daily driver/work truck.


RIP ElJay
RIP 67ChevyRedneck
RIP Grumpy Old Man
RIP FleetsidePaul
leddzepp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2013, 06:53 PM   #12
John Pasinski
Registered User
 
John Pasinski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: orlando
Posts: 456
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

Quote:
Originally Posted by tony58 View Post
Moog can be from many countries. The advantage to Moog regardless if it's Chinese or not is they (Moog) ensure their products meet minimum quality levels, unlike small companies that don't care about quality.
I agree! In my line of work, I have to buy industrial material handling parts. Although many if not most mfg'rs purchase offshore, the reputable ones have their parts and components mfg'd to their engineered standards.
China makes junk only when the customer doesn't care. They can make anything cheaper than we can even to high standards. This is because there are little to no environmental laws, worker safety laws, workers comp protection, labor laws etc...
__________________
A man's thoughts devise his ways; but it's GOD that directs his steps.
John Pasinski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2013, 06:54 PM   #13
Husker
Registered User
 
Husker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mid NE USA
Posts: 2,212
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

Moog
Ron
__________________
Member #111
68 C-10 Daily Driver
70 4x4 Project
76 Jeep CJ-5

Help Support the Board:

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/payments.php


He who knows nothing is closer to the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.
Thomas Jefferson
Husker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2013, 07:50 PM   #14
hounddogs!
Restoring it $200 at a time...
 
hounddogs!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: NE Kansas
Posts: 887
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

I bought everything for a '71 3/4T individually from RockAuto last summer. All Moog, all made in USA.


Ought to be good for another 40 years; by then I won't care.
__________________
Charter member of the 'Put the dimmer switch back on the damn floor where it belongs' Society


'68 5.3L-4 speed LWB C20; grandpa bought it for the farm in '71. Now LS 5.3, rather than 327.

DD '09 Pilot

Weekender '65 Skylark 300-4V-4 speed

Wife's '07 Lexus ES350; 117 actuator motors and I can't see the engine.

Son's '04 F250 SuperCab 6.0
hounddogs! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2013, 08:12 PM   #15
bigmac73
Senior Member
 
bigmac73's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Chesapeake, Va
Posts: 1,275
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

Raybestos Pro grade from rock auto
__________________
Mike
72 C-10 Cheyenne off frame resto and Upgraded to 4 wheel disk, Tilt, Dakota Digital Dash / Rear slider.
421 SBC / TH350 3000RPM Stall
Progression Ignition /Holley 750 DP/3:73 gear Eaton Limited Slip unit / 2 1/2 exhaust glasspacks
bigmac73 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-10-2013, 11:11 PM   #16
Prematuregrey
Registered User
 
Prematuregrey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 111
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

I use Moog when available. I know they can be made in other countries, but like previously stated, they ensure minimum quality standards. We use a lot of Moog valves in our subs and robotic manipulators and only see issues come up from other faults like a pump crapping the bed and sending shavings through them or improper installation. Every time I've replaced a Moog item, I can attribute its failure to some other fault or misuse.
__________________
Owner: Times Are Tough Toys
92 4 Runner (Joyce, long story from my time in Africa) Lotsa stuff, just about finished dumping money into it.
89 Mercedes 560 SEL, Merdle. Wrecked
71 Chevy K20, Clifford, BB and 1 Tons
Prematuregrey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2013, 03:13 AM   #17
hockeyjerk1
Registered User
 
hockeyjerk1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: sammamish, wa
Posts: 93
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

I bought my front end stuff from Rockauto and it was all either Moog or Raybestos and on the surface were great prices, BUT,
I would have been better off buying a complete kit from one of the many quality vendors mostly because of shipping cost.
Also Rockauto is not always careful about what is really in the packages. I got dodge dakota ball joints in one shipment. Cross reference the part numbers with the moog/raybestos/Delco numbers before purchasing
hockeyjerk1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2013, 09:14 AM   #18
Ralph (1970 GMC)
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Portland, Maine
Posts: 26
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

Thank you all for your input - it's been very helpful !
Ralph (1970 GMC) is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2013, 09:18 AM   #19
csfields
Registered User
 
csfields's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Elizabethtown, Kentucky
Posts: 322
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

I got all mine (pictured in my build thread) from Federated Auto Parts using Moog. They fit well and seemed to be of OEM quality.
__________________
Thanks,
Casey

71 Chevy C-10 SWB 350/400 PS, PB
The Build http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=584045

The Brake Upgrade http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=695699
csfields is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2013, 06:14 AM   #20
heyjoe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: New Orleans area
Posts: 198
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

I am very leery about any item or part marked or advertised with the word "professional" or "pro".

Those words have become merely marketing terms that mean diddly-squat. Years ago, I noticed the proliferation of the words "pro" or "professional" at the time the Big-Box stores began cropping up. It was a marketing ploy to delude the Do It To Yourselfers that they were buying products that professional tradesmen could buy from supply houses at trade-discounted prices. In reality, the Big-Boxes were selling cheaply made offshore crap.

Until I start getting what I deem as crap parts from MOOG, I will continue to have trust in their quality. Not much trust in the other brands, regardless of how "professional" they are marketed as.
heyjoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2013, 07:51 AM   #21
coueshunter
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Alliance, Oh
Posts: 77
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

Does XRF make parts for our trucks? Very well designed and working parts for my other truck and jeep
coueshunter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2013, 09:30 AM   #22
PanelDeland
I am a Referee of life.
 
PanelDeland's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Greensboro N.C.
Posts: 13,992
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

Quote:
Originally Posted by heyjoe View Post
I am very leery about any item or part marked or advertised with the word "professional" or "pro".

Those words have become merely marketing terms that mean diddly-squat. Years ago, I noticed the proliferation of the words "pro" or "professional" at the time the Big-Box stores began cropping up. It was a marketing ploy to delude the Do It To Yourselfers that they were buying products that professional tradesmen could buy from supply houses at trade-discounted prices. In reality, the Big-Boxes were selling cheaply made offshore crap.

Until I start getting what I deem as crap parts from MOOG, I will continue to have trust in their quality. Not much trust in the other brands, regardless of how "professional" they are marketed as.
Pro is a misleading term.It really denotes only that a person is paid to do something.An expert however is someone who does it in an expert manner.
__________________
The 47-present Chevrolet and GMC Truck Message Board Network,it's owners,moderators,members,and associates of any type should not be held responsible for my opinion.
You can't fix stupid,not even with duct tape.
"My appearance is due to the fact that "GOD" does punish you for having too much fun!"
Barrett-Jackson has perfected alchemy,they make rust into gold!
"You can lead a horse to water but you can't saddle a duck"
"Cleverly disguised as a 'Responsible Adult'
"Sometimes your Knight in shining armor is just a retard in tinfoil"
PanelDeland is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2013, 10:00 AM   #23
eldogg
Registered User
 
eldogg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Mooresville NC/Gainesville GA
Posts: 499
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

I prefer Raybestos over Moog. I really like the attached ball joint boots. I think if you compare them side by side you will see the difference.
eldogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-15-2013, 10:39 AM   #24
TexasLS1
Registered User
 
TexasLS1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Jonestown, TX
Posts: 471
Re: Moog vs. Raybestos : Ball Joints & Tie Rods

Tagging for later, getting ready to buy these. Thanks for the info guys
TexasLS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com