The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-09-2003, 03:59 PM   #1
iluvmy72
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springville, UT, USA
Posts: 1,010
69 with a Vortec 4.3

I saw one today.....it was pretty cool.....it had a 600 Carter on top with a high rise Holly intake along with some headers to go wth it.....the man claims he gets 310 horse and 330 torque.....hard to believe for a V-6 but I couldn't call him a liar since I didn't build his engine....man he had lots of room in that engine compartment.....anyone else toyed this idea?

iluvmy72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2003, 04:03 PM   #2
Hooter
My other Love
 
Hooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Castlegar B.C. Canada
Posts: 4,085
I wonder what kind of milage he gets with that thing?
__________________




Castlegar B.C.The great white North (Canada Eh!)
Hooter_5@hotmail.com
First generation Monte Carlo club
pictures of my life
Hooter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-09-2003, 09:06 PM   #3
lukecp
Formerly yellow72custom
 
lukecp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 7,531
I dont think the 4.3 would be a bad swap into one of these trucks. The Vortec versions had anywhere from 175 net hp, all the way up to a 200 net hp CPI version. A stock 350 has about 175 net hp, so the difference in acceleration wouldn't be that much differnt, besides a loss in low-end power (less torque). Much better power, and proably better fuel mileage than a 140 net hp 250, or a fuel thirsty 292.

I toyed with the idea before i joined the board, when i had a sick 350 in my truck, and a sick TBI 4.3 to use as a core....then i found that a 4.3 rebuild would be ~$1500, and the 350 rebuild would be less than a grand....so i used the 350 and i am very happy with it
__________________
'72 Chevy C10 Mild 350/TH350/3.07. Ochre/White. Old high school ride.
'70 GMC C2500 '62 327 4bbl/SM465/4.56-geared Dana 60. White/White. Project or parts truck.
'97 Saturn SL DD. 1.9/5-speed. 40+ highway mpg
lukecp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2003, 08:26 AM   #4
OHsweet69
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: crothersville, IN 47229
Posts: 18
my brother had a 92 work truck with the 4.3. i was very impressed with the low end torque that it had. he got about 20 miles to the gallon. it was a 5 speed. never took it easy always heavy footed.
__________________
69 short step (on 2000 durrango frame)
95 dodge cummins cummins
92 dodge dually 4x4 cummins
77 ford hi-boy (cummins someday)
OHsweet69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2003, 11:04 AM   #5
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
Don't mess with the CPI versions, pretty much everyone who had one will tell you the exact same laundry list of problems. In reality, I find it disturbing that GM would let it be sold with so many problems.
I highly doubt he is getting 310/330 out of that thing...I find it very hard to believe. He is probably going by the seat of the pants dyno.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2003, 11:56 AM   #6
iluvmy72
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springville, UT, USA
Posts: 1,010
remember that the overall block size isn't far from a V-8......the bore is much bigger.
iluvmy72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2003, 12:38 PM   #7
old Rusty C10
Robert Olson Transport
 
old Rusty C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: recent transplant to NC USA
Posts: 20,281
id like to see pics and what was the laundry list of problems???
__________________
Bob



1951 International running on a squarebody chassis


"If a man's worth is judged by the people he associates himself with, then i am the richest man in the world knowing some of the fine people of this board"
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/a...t.php?f=25&a=9 (you can review the site rules here!)


PM Me for your vehicle/parts hauling needs in the North East US or see my Facebook page Robert Olson Transport

Live each day to the fullest.. you never know when fate is going to pull the rug out from under you...
I hate cancer!!
old Rusty C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2003, 01:19 PM   #8
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
The bore is the sae as a 350, that is all it is is a 350 with 2 jugs cut off.
The early 4.3 Vortec problems (cpi injection) include;
EGR valves that last 10,000 miles and cost over 200 bucks.
Fuel pressure regulators that last a few years, but you have to buy the CPI unit to replace it at about 450 bucks.
Throttle body linkages that like to bind.
Motor mounts that fall apart prematurly.
Tranny mounts that fall apart prematurly.
poor valve seals that leak after 50,000 miles and smoke on start up.
I'm trying to remember more(I know there is more), but I have been trying to forget that POS.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2003, 03:32 PM   #9
lukecp
Formerly yellow72custom
 
lukecp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 7,531
They may have been POS's.....but the CPI 4.3's were the most powerful naturally aspirated 4.3 GM has put in a S10 yet. Even more powerful than the new Vortec 4.3's (190hp). The Typhoon/Syclone trucks had 4.3's with forced induction...and were rated at 280hp i think. I have read that they ran mid 13's bone stock.....pretty fast for a 6-cylinder S10 .
__________________
'72 Chevy C10 Mild 350/TH350/3.07. Ochre/White. Old high school ride.
'70 GMC C2500 '62 327 4bbl/SM465/4.56-geared Dana 60. White/White. Project or parts truck.
'97 Saturn SL DD. 1.9/5-speed. 40+ highway mpg
lukecp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-10-2003, 05:16 PM   #10
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
Don't get me wrong, that blazer would flat out haul when it was running properly...but it was a dog choking on it's own breath half the time I had it.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2003, 01:33 AM   #11
iluvmy72
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springville, UT, USA
Posts: 1,010
hey longhorn

I thionk you are wrong on the bore size of the 4.3.......Ive seen the pistons for these 4.3's and they are about 1/4 bigger....but then again there could have been different variations in the bore size over the years......this engine that the guy had came from a 88 Astro Van......man that engine you had sounds like it was a damn lemon.
iluvmy72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2003, 04:23 PM   #12
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
I agree that mine was a POS, but I have spoken to way too many people who had the exact same problems.
Another one I just thought of was the seal on the factory sandwich adapter for the oil cooler. It mounted between the block and the oil filter. I replaced it 4 times with Genuine GM gaskets, and then 2 more times with fell pro gaskets. (plus some one had been in there before me...so add at least one more time to the list.) Finally I took the seal from a huge oil filter for a perterbuilt or something we had laying around and used a butt load of sillicone. FINALLY...it stopped leaking for a few years. But it did start to leak again, I still have the stained cement driveway to prove it.
The bore was either a 305 bore or a 350 bore...like I said, I have tried to forget that 7 year nightmare.
Was your '88 a CPI, or throttle body? The throttle body engines didn't have nearly as many problems as the CPI ones did.
I was under the impression that '92 was the first year for the CPI set up.
I haven't even touched on the problems with the rest of the truck.
All I'll say is properly lubed upper controll arm bushihngs should last more than 60,000 miles before they fall apart.
Like I said, this thing ran liek a scalded dog when it ran properly. It was no problem to spin the tires through first and a good 25 - 35 feet into second gear...and this was an automatic.
It was no big block, but that thing was a monster for a stock Kroger Cruiser....when it ran properly.

SUVs... ...Nothing but a station wagon with a lift kit. pffft.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2003, 05:00 PM   #13
smokekiki
Mike
 
smokekiki's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: west chester pa
Posts: 2,474
The 4.3 is the same cyl size as a 5.7.
__________________
70'c/10, 71 suburban4x4 402bb, 72suburban 4/6 drop, 72k/5 4x4 blazer 4" lift 35 tires
smokekiki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2003, 05:34 PM   #14
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
350, that's what I had thought.
Thanks smokeekiki
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-11-2003, 06:00 PM   #15
palallin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. James, MO
Posts: 1,239
My wife and I bought a 4.3 S-10 4-dr Blazer last year. It had 145,xxx miles then; we've put another 12,000 on since. She runs like a dream, is easy on gas, is moderately peppy, hasn't got a spot of rust anywhere, and has cost me nothing except routine maintenance in the past year.

I guess we've been lucky, but this truck is the best vehicle deal I've ever had as far as condition and upkeep. I love my K-10, but he is pretty good at devouring money.

I would NOT want to try to move my K-10 around with the 4.3, though
__________________
'69 Longstep K-10: 327/SM465/T-221/Closed Knuckle Dana44/12-bolt.
palallin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2003, 10:27 AM   #16
1998c1500
Registered User
 
1998c1500's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 200
Try this v-6 in your engine bayhttp://www.sportmachines.com/magrack/ttsup_8-95.html
1998c1500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2003, 12:00 PM   #17
Canada20
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 802
I thought the Cyclone/Typhoon were using the Buick 3.8 supercharged engine? Maybe the Buick supercharger on the 4.3. Sorry.....jacking the thread

I've heard that the 4.3 is supposed to be a pretty good engine but it sounds like you really need to be careful which ones you get. I'd always thought it would be a good alternatice to the 292 that came with my truck as I'd had a 2.8 V-6 in an '83 Ranger and it seemed to get around alright.

Greg
__________________
No such thing as a stupid question, right?

Last edited by Canada20; 10-15-2003 at 12:23 PM.
Canada20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2003, 12:53 PM   #18
Dean
Senior Member
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,492
The 229 V6 is the same bore as the 305; 262 (4.3) is the same as 350. I started with the early 4.3 in my Chevette, but it is far far from stock. Lunati roller cam, Brodix aluminum heads, Brodix high rise, Eldebrock carb, etc etc.

It screams in that light little car, but I'm all for torque in a truck.

And don't get me started on POS S10s....lol......aggghhhhh......
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2003, 01:27 PM   #19
Yellow Cheyenne
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Eastern Kansas
Posts: 488
Some questions. What does CPI stand for? I just bought a '96 Chevy 1/2 ton with a 4.3 litre Vortec that has 192,000 miles on it. It doesn't smoke on startup, but I haven't driven it far enough to know if it will use any oil. '96 was the first year the vortec was available in the 1/2 tons. Was it available earlier in the S10's? I bought V-6 for gas mileage as my father in law has a '92 with about 220,000 miles on it that still runs good (does smoke on start-up, but doesn't use oil) and he was getting 20-21 MPG. I drove mine back from Texas at about 75 MPH and got 20.75 MPG, much better than the typical 11-12 MPG I get with my '72 when cruising at that speed. The '96 doesn't have the power that the '72 has, but it is very respectable. Talked to a friend that owns an auto repair shop and he said the only main concern he would have with it is the fuel pump (I just replaced as a precaution) and some tubes between the injectors that are expensive to replace-so I will wait to replace those until they start showing signs of trouble. Other than that, he said they are pretty reliable vehicles. Sounds like at least some of the problems Longhorn was having are with the vehicle as much as the engine. I'm hoping mine will be ok.

Randy
__________________
'72 Cheyenne. AC, PS, PB, Rear slider window, tilt. Light yellow (grapefruit yellow according to new sales literature from '72)
'56 Chevy short step V-8 (My dad bought it new!!)
'70 Olds 442 convertible
'70 Olds Rallye 350

Last edited by Yellow Cheyenne; 10-15-2003 at 01:29 PM.
Yellow Cheyenne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2003, 01:27 PM   #20
lukecp
Formerly yellow72custom
 
lukecp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 7,531
The buick's used a turbocharged 3.8.....the Typhoon/Scylone trucks used a forced induction 4.3 (think it was turbocharged).

I used to have a TBI 4.3 and it was an excellent engine....my mom has a Vortec 4.3 (190HP) in a S10 and it is also an excellent engine....zero problems so far, 22mpg, and enough power to get out of its own way. I keep trying to get her to buy a supercharger for it but she just dosen't understand
__________________
'72 Chevy C10 Mild 350/TH350/3.07. Ochre/White. Old high school ride.
'70 GMC C2500 '62 327 4bbl/SM465/4.56-geared Dana 60. White/White. Project or parts truck.
'97 Saturn SL DD. 1.9/5-speed. 40+ highway mpg
lukecp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2003, 06:06 PM   #21
1969 GMC
Registered User
 
1969 GMC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Rubber City
Posts: 5,498
Mid 80's Buick Grand National, GNX, Turbo Riviera, and Turbo Regal all used a turbocharged 3.8L V6.

Early 90's to present Buick Park Avenue Ultra, Regal GS, Olds 98 Touring Car, and Pontiac GTP use a supercharged 3.8L V6.

Syclone/Typhoon used a turbocharged 4.3L V6.

I was under the impression that a 4.3 was simply a 350 minus two cylinders, and a 3.8 was a 305/307 minus two cylinders. Even though the 229 (3.8L) V6 has been around longer than either the 305 or 307.
__________________
1969 GMC K2500
1996 Honda Accord
2007 Kawasaki KLR 650
1969 GMC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2003, 06:10 PM   #22
iluvmy72
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Springville, UT, USA
Posts: 1,010
wow....was this subject ever brought back from the dead.
iluvmy72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2003, 09:35 PM   #23
Tx Firefighter
Watch out for your cornhole !
 
Tx Firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
Both 350 and 4.3 have 4 inch bore. Pistons are even interchangable.

<hijack on> As a note, I have a 93 model Throttle body 4.3 for sale. It's complete from aircleaner to oil pan. All the throttle body, distributor, exhaust manifolds, everything. Runs great. I just pulled it out to put a 350 in it's place. I'm tired of it being on my engine stand. 100 dollars in DFW area. Trade for anything. It needs to go. <hijack off>
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin
Tx Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2003, 10:01 PM   #24
highboy_04
Registered User
 
highboy_04's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: kansas
Posts: 1,071
man tx firefighter to bad i dont live closer to you. i would take the motor off yer hands
__________________
'67 c10 350/th350
highboy_04 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2003, 11:55 PM   #25
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
Yellow Cheyenne, you should be OK, I am 99.9% sure that by 96, Chevy got there head out of there tail pipe on this vortec set up. CPI stands for Central Port Injection. It is almost liek a cross between TBI and MPFI. It has one fuel injector down under the top half of the intake, and 6 popet valves that spray the fuel into each cylinder.
And wow, iluvmy72 is right...brought back from the dead...gotta love the search being up again.
Just as the Blazer nightmares were coming to an end, y'all go and bring this one back ttt.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com