The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 09-15-2014, 07:03 PM   #1
evolve520
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Superior, CO
Posts: 59
Why would something this simple not be made any more

Saw a truck recently where the owner fabbed something like this up and did some digging around. Looked like such a simple idea but nobody makes one like it. Wonder why. Guy I spoke to welded a bunch of stuff together to make it work and said it drove great. These are pics of a kit that is no longer available I found in an old thread from 2009 or so.
Attached Images
  
evolve520 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-15-2014, 07:07 PM   #2
71swb4x4
Senior Member
 
71swb4x4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Brookings, SD
Posts: 10,497
Re: Why would something this simple not be made any more

Coil over kits are produced. Google "coil over kits" and you will find all sorts of options.
On a truck I do believe it will have it's limits, mainly in spring size. You have a MUCH smaller spring which will limit the ability to make it heavy enough to carry a load that may be associated with a pickup. I am sure they can be made to carry a decent amount of weight, but I am not sure at what cost.
I believe they are mainly used in cars that have limited suspension space, so they integrated the shock and spring. In a truck with lots of space to have separate coils and shocks it makes more since to have two separate pieces.
__________________
Some people are like slinkies, they aren't good for anything, but you can't help but smile when you see one tumble down the stairs.
71swb4x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2014, 11:00 AM   #3
evolve520
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Superior, CO
Posts: 59
Re: Why would something this simple not be made any more

I know coilover kits exist, but this seems so simple and easy. A bracket that mounts to the trailing arm and another that bolts to the frame. Put the right size coilover o there and your done.
evolve520 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2014, 01:15 PM   #4
PGSigns
Senior Member
 
PGSigns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hayes Va
Posts: 4,569
Re: Why would something this simple not be made any more

The idea is a sound one the way that kit was made was a little light duty based on what we did on the drag cars. It could be beefed up and would work fine. The springs are not a problem to get rates that would give a good ride and some load carrying but in a truck set up very low they dont see a lot of loaded running.
Jimmy
__________________
60 to 66 Chevy and GMC window decals
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=661131
Good friends, good food and a hotrod what else do you need?
1966 BBW long fleet Daily driver
1965 BBW short fleet Sold and going to a good home
1965 Suburban
2003 3500 Duramax
2005 Ultra Classic
PGSigns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2014, 04:57 PM   #5
dirtyjim
Registered User
 
dirtyjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: alvin, texas
Posts: 622
Re: Why would something this simple not be made any more

I have that kit from the pictures on my 67 and there are a couple things I would do different if I was fabbing one up. the kit really needed a 5" stroke shock instead of a 4" and the upper shock mount would need to be 1" higher up to match up with the longer shock.
__________________
1967 C10 lwb two tone, 305 & rat fink style floor shifted 700r4, 20" steelies
2004 2500HD utility bed aka Brutus
dirtyjim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2014, 05:31 PM   #6
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 21,984
Re: Why would something this simple not be made any more

Quote:
Originally Posted by dirtyjim View Post
I have that kit from the pictures on my 67 and there are a couple things I would do different if I was fabbing one up. the kit really needed a 5" stroke shock instead of a 4" and the upper shock mount would need to be 1" higher up to match up with the longer shock.
I've seen that kit before & thought it needed a longer shock/spring stroke as well. I thought it would be better to place the lower bracket down 1" to avoid bed floor clearance issues. Seems it was really close when I was brainstroming the possibilities??

I suggested the same set-up location when I gave my 'Ultimate Truck Arm' spec list to Mr. PB too . . .....
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2014, 06:20 PM   #7
dirtyjim
Registered User
 
dirtyjim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: alvin, texas
Posts: 622
Re: Why would something this simple not be made any more

there is plenty of room to raise the upper mount before it would interfere with the bed floor
__________________
1967 C10 lwb two tone, 305 & rat fink style floor shifted 700r4, 20" steelies
2004 2500HD utility bed aka Brutus
dirtyjim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2014, 10:23 AM   #8
68racer
Yeah baby!
 
68racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 436
Re: Why would something this simple not be made any more

I used that one with a longer shock and raised the mounting point. I braced between the top of the two upper mounts. Works great.
__________________
11.37 @116
68racer is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:27 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com