Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
01-25-2015, 02:30 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Montrose, CO
Posts: 972
|
2500 versus 2600 in rear for soft ride
I currently have 2500 bags with Schrader valves on the rear of my 66 C20. I need to get new shocks, since I don't really know how old mine are, and I'm pretty sure they are bottoming out occasionally. I relocated the shock mounts using the old mounts, like frizzlefry and ScotI did.
However, it does ride a little harsher than I was hoping for. Would the 2600's ride a little softer since they will have a little less pressure for the same ride height (I think)? FYI, I live in the mountains in Colorado (jst moved), and have 240 pounds of sand in the bed for traction. |
01-26-2015, 01:37 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,071
|
Re: 2500 versus 2600 in rear for soft ride
How much pressure is it requiring to achieve your ride height?
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
01-26-2015, 12:10 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Montrose, CO
Posts: 972
|
Re: 2500 versus 2600 in rear for soft ride
With the sand in the bed, it's at about 48-50 psi.
|
01-26-2015, 12:32 PM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,071
|
Re: 2500 versus 2600 in rear for soft ride
2600's would require less air psi for the same height as the 2500's. I wouldn't think the ~50psi is excessive. But, if you feel it is, the larger bag would require less psi.
I would do shocks first & make a decision after re-testing.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
01-26-2015, 05:59 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Montrose, CO
Posts: 972
|
Re: 2500 versus 2600 in rear for soft ride
Yep, that's pretty much the same plan I was thinking since either way I need the shocks replaced. Thanks for the replies.
|
01-29-2015, 07:40 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 1,523
|
Re: 2500 versus 2600 in rear for soft ride
agreed. change shocks. I recommend the QA-1 Street Shock. They have 18 way adjustability for compression/rebound....awesome
....night and day over anything drop shock or Monroe can do
__________________
Best Regards, Leon M. Instagram: @TheDirtyDianah
Bagged | 6.0L LS | T-56 (6-Speed Manual) | Turbo Burnout/Rolling Video: Chevy C10 Stepside 6.0L LSx & 6-Speed Manual |
Bookmarks |
|
|