![]() |
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 148
|
Why would upper control arms be at steep angle?
This is a basic question, I should probably know but want to understand this better. I have a Mustang 2 front end on my '59 and it's a kit made for this truck. The upper control arm is at such a steep angle it tore the boots on both upper ball joints. I have the ride height where I want it. It's not slammed to the ground or anything radical. Is this because the coil springs are not long enough? TCI told me the springs are 375# and have a 14" free length.
__________________
'59 Big Window Fleetside |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
Never Ending Projects
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 3,836
|
Re: Why would upper control arms be at steep angle?
Without pics, it's going to be hard to say but from what I recall setting up a Mustang II front end years ago, you want your ride height to have the lower arms level.
This was during mock up on my old Nova. This would be ride height and the arms are level. ![]()
__________________
. 1965 C10 Panel, ![]() 1968 Chevy C10, Long, Fleetside, Hot Rod Hauler http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=313233 SOLD 1965 Chevy C10, Long, Fleetside, Hot Rod C10 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=415702 SOLD We were given two ears and one mouth for a reason... listen twice as much and speak half as often... |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
|
|