The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1960 - 1966 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-17-2016, 05:43 PM   #1
suburban99
Registered User
 
suburban99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Mission BC
Posts: 452
62 c10 ride height question.

62 c10 longbox disc brake front end swapped from a 78...5x5 bolt pattern.
3" drop spindles in the front but truck sits front high. Ls swapped 5.3..Do you guys cut the front springs to lower after installing drop spindles? If so How much do I cut to lower 2 more inches?..Thanks here's a pic or 2.
Attached Images
   
suburban99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2016, 07:22 PM   #2
64shortbox
Registered User
 
64shortbox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Tulare, CA
Posts: 733
Re: 62 c10 ride height question.

not sure how much to cut off your coils to get your 2" drop but you can get 2" drop springs from Summit for $125.00 a pair.

http://www.summitracing.com/parts/djm-cs2353-2/reviews/
64shortbox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2016, 08:02 PM   #3
Slow Build
Registered User
 
Slow Build's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: California Delta
Posts: 2,163
Re: 62 c10 ride height question.

If the pictures are with the 3" drop spindles something is wrong. Get some pictures of the from suspension up so we can check it out.
__________________
Name: Rich
Current Ride: 1964 C-10 Short Fleetside
Daily Driver: 2005 GMC crew cab short fleetside /2001 Chevy Tahoe
Past GM Trucks:
1959 GMC short stepside
1968 GMC short stepside-4x4
1973 Chevy short stepside
1989 Chevy short fleetside-reg cab
1993 Chevy short fleetside-Xcab
2002 Chevy short fleetside-Xcab

Save the dinosaurs, use synthetic oil.
Slow Build is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2016, 08:10 PM   #4
dougf
Registered User
 
dougf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Fort Campbell, KY
Posts: 494
Re: 62 c10 ride height question.

I agree. With 3" spindles it should sit a heck of a lot lower in the front.
__________________
AIR ASSAULT
dougf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2016, 08:30 PM   #5
PGSigns
Senior Member
 
PGSigns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hayes Va
Posts: 4,569
Re: 62 c10 ride height question.

Couple of things that may be contributing to the stance. First are the front springs sitting in the pocket correctly? This would be first place I would look as it happens a good bit. Second is there are still a lot of parts to put on that truck that will ad weight to the front of the truck. If you are sure the springs are in right I would not cut coil till the truck is assembled. And are you sure they are 3"? Going by what I can see from the pics, the lower a arms don't look real low on the wheel.
Jimmy
__________________
60 to 66 Chevy and GMC window decals
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=661131
Good friends, good food and a hotrod what else do you need?
1966 BBW long fleet Daily driver
1965 BBW short fleet Sold and going to a good home
1965 Suburban
2003 3500 Duramax
2005 Ultra Classic
PGSigns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2016, 08:31 PM   #6
suburban99
Registered User
 
suburban99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Mission BC
Posts: 452
Re: 62 c10 ride height question.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Slow Build View Post
If the pictures are with the 3" drop spindles something is wrong. Get some pictures of the from suspension up so we can check it out.
Yes the 3" drop spindles are installed...I don't know the donor vehicle for the front end..it was installed when I bought the truck...I compared the spindles to the ones I removed and they are 3" different. I will post some front end pictures..
suburban99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2016, 08:56 PM   #7
suburban99
Registered User
 
suburban99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Mission BC
Posts: 452
Re: 62 c10 ride height question.

Quote:
Originally Posted by PGSigns View Post
Couple of things that may be contributing to the stance. First are the front springs sitting in the pocket correctly? This would be first place I would look as it happens a good bit. Second is there are still a lot of parts to put on that truck that will ad weight to the front of the truck. If you are sure the springs are in right I would not cut coil till the truck is assembled. And are you sure they are 3"? Going by what I can see from the pics, the lower a arms don't look real low on the wheel.
Jimmy
Most of the front parts are installed including the 5.3 and 4l60e...maybe the 5.3 is lighter than the stock motor? I will check the spring pockets..
suburban99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2016, 09:35 PM   #8
notsolo
Registered User
 
notsolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Md
Posts: 2,464
Re: 62 c10 ride height question.

Front of truck looks stock height to me, and is it me or the photo, passenger side looks higher. also you said Spindles were 3" different? .... 2 1/2" drop Spindle should be close to center up and down between ball joints. Not criticizing, just trying to help.
notsolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2016, 10:06 PM   #9
Mathew21
Senior Member
 
Mathew21's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Clinton township, MI
Posts: 1,192
Re: 62 c10 ride height question.

My Truck is a 66' with 86' cross member swap 5.3 / 4l60e with 2.5" drop spindles and 2" front lowering springs. The rear has 4" lowering springs.

__________________
It only has original paint once

Last edited by Mathew21; 01-18-2016 at 09:09 AM.
Mathew21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2016, 11:52 PM   #10
suburban99
Registered User
 
suburban99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Mission BC
Posts: 452
Re: 62 c10 ride height question.

Went out and took a look at the spring pockets...looks like the coils are not seated correctly in the pockets. I installed the drop spindles with the engine out as I replaced all the control arm related bushings at same time..and I had a hard time getting the coils to seat without the weight of the engine on the front end..(i would jack up lower control arm and whole front end would lift) Hopefully that will get me lower in the front end. Any tricks to getting them seated in the pockets?
suburban99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2016, 11:54 PM   #11
suburban99
Registered User
 
suburban99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Mission BC
Posts: 452
Re: 62 c10 ride height question.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mathew21 View Post
My Truck is a 66' 5.3 / 4l60e with 2.5" drop spindles and 2" front lowering springs. The rear has 4" lowering springs.

That's the ride height I like! Nice truck...
suburban99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2016, 06:28 AM   #12
notsolo
Registered User
 
notsolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Md
Posts: 2,464
Re: 62 c10 ride height question.

See if you can barrow spring compressor from O'rieilly's, Auto zone, Napa...
notsolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-18-2016, 08:54 AM   #13
PGSigns
Senior Member
 
PGSigns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hayes Va
Posts: 4,569
Re: 62 c10 ride height question.

As long as you get them centered around the spigot as you go up they will stay there. If you are pulling them out cut a 1/2 wrap off the bottom of the spring. Spring is smaller around at the top. Round off the sharp edges after you cut them. Then adjust the ride height lower if you want after the truck is done.
Jimmy
__________________
60 to 66 Chevy and GMC window decals
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=661131
Good friends, good food and a hotrod what else do you need?
1966 BBW long fleet Daily driver
1965 BBW short fleet Sold and going to a good home
1965 Suburban
2003 3500 Duramax
2005 Ultra Classic
PGSigns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2016, 11:51 PM   #14
suburban99
Registered User
 
suburban99's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Mission BC
Posts: 452
Re: 62 c10 ride height question. Updated>>

Trimmed 1-1/2 coils of the springs and installed them in the bucket correctly..Thanks for the replies! It now looks like this.
Attached Images
  
suburban99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com