The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-27-2016, 01:49 PM   #1
Coach529
Registered User
 
Coach529's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Post Falls, Idaho
Posts: 1,757
Clearance around bags

I am installing some Slam Specialties SS-7 bags in my 1949 Chevy 3600.

Thunderbird IRS in the back, Scott Danforth Cross Member in the front.



I am setting the back up now and I am a little tight on space with the 7" bag. I plan to open up the notch a little since I have room available.





Is there a rule of thumb.....or a guideline on how clearance you should have around the bag to prevent chaffing or a rub?

Thanks in advance?
__________________
1949 Chevy 3600

"Adventures of Henry"

http://smu.gs/QOlhWY
Coach529 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2016, 02:23 PM   #2
PGSigns
Senior Member
 
PGSigns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Hayes Va
Posts: 4,569
Re: Clearance around bags

I try and make sure I have a 1/2 inch. On you welds, slow down on the travel and maybe turn up the heat. The ones on the sides look like they have little penetration.
Jimmy
__________________
60 to 66 Chevy and GMC window decals
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=661131
Good friends, good food and a hotrod what else do you need?
1966 BBW long fleet Daily driver
1965 BBW short fleet Sold and going to a good home
1965 Suburban
2003 3500 Duramax
2005 Ultra Classic
PGSigns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-27-2016, 02:42 PM   #3
Coach529
Registered User
 
Coach529's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Post Falls, Idaho
Posts: 1,757
Re: Clearance around bags

Quote:
Originally Posted by PGSigns View Post
I try and make sure I have a 1/2 inch. On you welds, slow down on the travel and maybe turn up the heat. The ones on the sides look like they have little penetration.
Jimmy
Thanks for the input.
__________________
1949 Chevy 3600

"Adventures of Henry"

http://smu.gs/QOlhWY
Coach529 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2016, 03:01 AM   #4
andrewmp6
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Louisville,Ky
Posts: 5,811
Re: Clearance around bags

I was always told a finger gap between the bag and anything it could touch.Anything the bag rubs on could rub a hole in it over time since its rubber.
andrewmp6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2016, 10:55 AM   #5
Coach529
Registered User
 
Coach529's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Post Falls, Idaho
Posts: 1,757
Re: Clearance around bags

Quote:
Originally Posted by andrewmp6 View Post
I was always told a finger gap between the bag and anything it could touch.Anything the bag rubs on could rub a hole in it over time since its rubber.
That is what I am shooting for.

Thanks!!
__________________
1949 Chevy 3600

"Adventures of Henry"

http://smu.gs/QOlhWY
Coach529 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2016, 10:57 AM   #6
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
Re: Clearance around bags

Why not go w/a smaller OD bag? The 7" bag is better suited for the front weight bias on a truck.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2016, 10:59 AM   #7
Coach529
Registered User
 
Coach529's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Post Falls, Idaho
Posts: 1,757
Re: Clearance around bags

Quote:
Originally Posted by SCOTI View Post
Why not go w/a smaller OD bag? The 7" bag is better suited for the front weight bias on a truck.
That was an option that I thought about as well.

I just really did not want to go through the hassle of selling these bags, buying new, etc.
__________________
1949 Chevy 3600

"Adventures of Henry"

http://smu.gs/QOlhWY
Coach529 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2016, 11:03 AM   #8
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
Re: Clearance around bags

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach529 View Post
That was an option that I thought about as well.

I just really did not want to go through the hassle of selling these bags, buying new, etc.
Seems easier vs the option of cutting & opening up the notch more since it appears a little thin as-is (might just be the angle on the pics).
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2016, 11:18 AM   #9
Coach529
Registered User
 
Coach529's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Post Falls, Idaho
Posts: 1,757
Re: Clearance around bags

I am not too worried about the integrity of the notch, but you have me thinking.

Is there a ride quality difference between the two bags?
__________________
1949 Chevy 3600

"Adventures of Henry"

http://smu.gs/QOlhWY
Coach529 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-28-2016, 11:53 AM   #10
SCOTI
Registered User
 
SCOTI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
Re: Clearance around bags

Quote:
Originally Posted by Coach529 View Post
I am not too worried about the integrity of the notch, but you have me thinking.

Is there a ride quality difference between the two bags?
Yes, there can be a difference but 'how much' is subjective. Some guys run the larger bags in the rear & use less pressure to achieve ride height for a better ride. I tried that on my 68 (7" bag equivalent) on the rear & found I was @ <30psi for my ride height. It basically had no spring rate @ that low of a pressure & the result was a very bouncy ride quality. By swapping to smaller bags I had to increase the inflation pressure to achieve the same ride height. Now I was @ ~40psi & no more bouncy ride (same shocks used for both).

Some guys may not notice. I definitely could.
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod
64SWB-Recycle
89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck
99CCSWB Driver
All Fleetsides
@rattlecankustoms in IG

Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive.
It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar.....

Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol.
SCOTI is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com