The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > Welcome and Discussion > Welcome Area

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 08-31-2016, 11:03 PM   #1
Treverreed
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Sorrento,LA
Posts: 0
400 vs 700 trans

I have an 89 Jeep Wrangler outfitted with a 350 dual feed carb, 400 turbo trans, 38" mud tires. It gets horrible fuel mileage. I have a 700 trans and debating on swapping it out for better fuel mileage. I don't plan on doing a lot of mud riding. What are your thoughts.
Attached Images
 
Treverreed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 10:05 AM   #2
AnotherWs6
Registered User
 
AnotherWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 602
Re: 400 vs 700 trans

What gears do you have? And what is your cruising highway rpm? Those tall tires are going to calm your gear ratio down quite a bit, and if your not screaming on the highway it might not help much. Though I believe -and please someone correct me if I'm wrong - the 700 has a numerically higher 1st gear which would help you from a stop since you'd need less throttle to get moving.

Not sure what jeeps come with gearing wise, but a 3.55 combined with 38's would put you right at 2,000rpm at 65. Which is pretty good.
__________________
1968 C-10 Suburban - Original 396/TH400
2002 Transam WS6 - M6 - Black/Black - Evil Garage Queen
2000 Silverado - DD - Small lift+Body lift+35" Duratracs+4.88's + Eaton TruTrac - Monster Truck
2010 Cadillac CTS Wagon Sport - Wife's DD and the only classy car we have.
AnotherWs6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 10:12 AM   #3
Treverreed
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Sorrento,LA
Posts: 0
Re: 400 vs 700 trans

Just bought the vehicle last week from someone. Not sure what gears I have. I do know that the guy he got it from was using it as a rock climber. I will check and see if he knows what gears are in it. It has been highly modified.
Posted via Mobile Device
Treverreed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 01:51 PM   #4
GASoline71
"I ain't nobody, dork."
 
GASoline71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,921
Re: 400 vs 700 trans

Fuel mileage is probably gonna suck no matter what.

Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars...

My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread.

The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck

Quote:
Originally Posted by LONGHAIR View Post
I would never rebuild a 305.
Quote:
Originally Posted by prostreetC-10 View Post
I love using vacuum gauges as part of the carb tuning process. I hook the gauge to the inside of my garbage can and leave it there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv D View Post
Remember Murphys 2nd law of mechanical relationships... "OPPOSING COMPONENTS ATTEMPTING TO OCCUPY THE SAME SPACE, AT THE SAME TIME, GENERALLY END UP OCCUPYING ADJOINING SPACE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OIL PAN"
Quote:
Originally Posted by cableguy0 View Post
Its cheaper to listen to advice given when you ask for help than it is to ignore everyone and wait for carnage.
GASoline71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 02:00 PM   #5
Treverreed
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Sorrento,LA
Posts: 0
Re: 400 vs 700 trans

Yea. I figured it would. Not looking for great fuel mileage but right now it's getting about 5 mpg
Posted via Mobile Device
Treverreed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 03:27 PM   #6
MalibuSSwagon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Weare,NH
Posts: 1,590
Re: 400 vs 700 trans

That seems exceptionally bad for a small block. Maybe look into getting it properly tuned and everything. Carb might be overkill for the application too. People usually slap on a "double pumper" cause it sounds cool, but really it's just blowing smoke like a brodozer diesel.
MalibuSSwagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 03:49 PM   #7
Treverreed
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Sorrento,LA
Posts: 0
Re: 400 vs 700 trans

I was thinking the same. Didn't see a need for that dual feed. I'm no mechanic so just trying to figure it out and get some ideas on what to do. I bought it drive and have fun with. Won't be rock climbing but may take it in the mud occasionally.
Posted via Mobile Device
Treverreed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 03:58 PM   #8
MalibuSSwagon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Weare,NH
Posts: 1,590
Re: 400 vs 700 trans

Could be would depend on how the engine was built as well. Could be you just need a smaller carb like an Edelbrock. There's also a new fuel injection system out called FITech, seems simple for anyone with basic wrenching skills to install and setup, plus it's cheap! It's self learning from what I understand so no need to pay a tuner. Maybe a better investment rather than tracking down a tuner that knows carbs these days.
MalibuSSwagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 04:53 PM   #9
GASoline71
"I ain't nobody, dork."
 
GASoline71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Whidbey Island, Washington
Posts: 8,921
Re: 400 vs 700 trans

Quote:
Originally Posted by Treverreed View Post
I was thinking the same. Didn't see a need for that dual feed. I'm no mechanic so just trying to figure it out and get some ideas on what to do. I bought it drive and have fun with. Won't be rock climbing but may take it in the mud occasionally.
Posted via Mobile Device
A "dual feed" Holley doesn't mean double pumper. There are dual feed Holley carbs (like a 3310) that have vacuum secondaries and can be had between 650cfm to around 850cfm.

Double pumper is referring to the rear accelerator pump and mechanical secondary linkage.

You could get by with just a "single feed" Holley such as an 1850 that is 600cfm.

You couldn't pay me to bolt on an Edelbrock.

Gary
__________________
'cuz chicks dig scars...

My 1972 GMC 1500 Super Custom (Creeping Death) "long term" build thread.

The Rebuild of Creeping Death after the wreck

Quote:
Originally Posted by LONGHAIR View Post
I would never rebuild a 305.
Quote:
Originally Posted by prostreetC-10 View Post
I love using vacuum gauges as part of the carb tuning process. I hook the gauge to the inside of my garbage can and leave it there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Marv D View Post
Remember Murphys 2nd law of mechanical relationships... "OPPOSING COMPONENTS ATTEMPTING TO OCCUPY THE SAME SPACE, AT THE SAME TIME, GENERALLY END UP OCCUPYING ADJOINING SPACE AT THE BOTTOM OF THE OIL PAN"
Quote:
Originally Posted by cableguy0 View Post
Its cheaper to listen to advice given when you ask for help than it is to ignore everyone and wait for carnage.
GASoline71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 05:11 PM   #10
Treverreed
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Sorrento,LA
Posts: 0
Re: 400 vs 700 trans

Eric that injection conversion sound interesting. If you have more info please send it to me.
Posted via Mobile Device
Treverreed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-01-2016, 06:23 PM   #11
MalibuSSwagon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Weare,NH
Posts: 1,590
Re: 400 vs 700 trans

Here ya go take a look.

http://fitechefi.com/products/

They have the "fuel command center" for an additional $400 but it's really just a "swirlpot" which your mechanical pump on the engine feeds and has an EFI pump inside to feed the EFI. Being an 89 you should already have a baffled tank stock and you should be able to drop in a stock fuel sender with a high pressure GM EFI pump and plumb directly to the throttle body. Lot of reviews and installs of this system out there.
MalibuSSwagon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-02-2016, 10:23 AM   #12
AnotherWs6
Registered User
 
AnotherWs6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Westchester, NY
Posts: 602
Re: 400 vs 700 trans

I know that there are a couple of other systems out there, I've never heard of this one. It's fairly reasoanbly priced. Wish I would have known before I bought a new carb a few months ago. I am keeping this on my radar. Between the cost of the new carb and the the two O2 wide-bands I bought to tune the carb I could have just about bought this system. Think I might actually sell it all now. I've been DDing my burb and getting less than 10 mpg, going about 400 miles a week. Probably would pay for itself in a short amount of time.

Can you see you AFR on the hand held thing? Can you use it while driving? One or two O2 sensors?
__________________
1968 C-10 Suburban - Original 396/TH400
2002 Transam WS6 - M6 - Black/Black - Evil Garage Queen
2000 Silverado - DD - Small lift+Body lift+35" Duratracs+4.88's + Eaton TruTrac - Monster Truck
2010 Cadillac CTS Wagon Sport - Wife's DD and the only classy car we have.
AnotherWs6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com