The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-04-2017, 11:49 PM   #1
Sikorsky72
Registered User
 
Sikorsky72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 8
engine vs. firewall

Last weekend I installed a new engine, rebuilt 350 trans and a rebuilt NP205 transfer case in my 72 chevy swb 4x4 k10. Long story short; move firewall or cross-member(s). After a few days deliberation I think I want to drill new holes in my frame and move the entire drivetrain forward 1". Anyone tried this?? Potential problems?? Advice??
__________________
I'm not young enough to know everything.
Sikorsky72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 01:36 PM   #2
BILT4ME
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 267
Re: engine vs. firewall

Why do you need to move the engine FORWARD? Does the distributor interfere with the firewall?

I had a custom truck I did a number of years ago and I used a ball peen hammer to stretch the steel in the firewall and created a recessed area about 1/2"-3/4" deep to clear the HEI distributor I installed. I located the area needing modified and used a sharpie marker to outline it, then with LOTS of gentle hits, I worked the metal into a recess that actually looks factory made to the untrained eye. I have no pics of it, as I sold the truck 17 years ago.........

If you move the engine FORWARD, you put more weight on the front axle. Generally for better handling and road manners, everyone usually wants to move the engine to the REAR.

In my case, I was placing a 69 Chevy body on a 60 K10 frame.
__________________
1970 GMC K2500
Dis-use is harder on a car than mis-use.
BILT4ME is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 02:43 PM   #3
truckster
Senior Member
 
truckster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Orem, Utah
Posts: 7,856
Re: engine vs. firewall

It's tight, but an HEI will fit a 4X4. Don't try to install it with the cap on.
truckster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 02:53 PM   #4
kwmech
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Colfax-California
Posts: 8,473
Re: engine vs. firewall

If you move the stand forward on the drivers forward to the next bolt hole you'll be good. I think it's 1-1/4'' then you only have to drill the pass side. I've done quite a few, especially on the K5s when putting in a doubler or t400. Helps with the rear driveline angle. After you do this, you can either cut the 4x shroud down or use the 2wd shroud. Make sure to check the oil pan clearance afterwards though. If you are at stock height, it may want to bump the oil pan. Any type of lift and your good
kwmech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 03:47 PM   #5
El Dorado Jim
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: El Dorado Ca
Posts: 3,374
Re: engine vs. firewall

Quote:
Originally Posted by truckster View Post
It's tight, but an HEI will fit a 4X4. Don't try to install it with the cap on.
x2 I installed an HEI in my K20 with no problem
El Dorado Jim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 05:04 PM   #6
Stocker
20' Daredevil (Ret)
 
Stocker's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Jefferson State
Posts: 13,572
Re: engine vs. firewall

Quote:
Originally Posted by truckster View Post
It's tight, but an HEI will fit a 4X4. Don't try to install it with the cap on.
x3
__________________
- Mike -

1972 K20 LWB 350/350/205

RIP El Jay
Stocker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 09:03 PM   #7
James Pierce
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cle Elum, Washington
Posts: 163
Re: engine vs. firewall

I installed a 75 350 w/HEI in a 69 C20 4x4, tight but worked.
__________________
cascadeheavychevy
67 C10 327 4speed
69 C20 350 4WD 4speed
69 C20 350 4WD 4speed
69 C20 350 4 soeed
69 C20 CST 350 Auto
70 C10 307 4speed
71 GMC Supr 350 Auto
70 C10 350 Auto
67 CST 327 Auto
James Pierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 09:12 PM   #8
1972RedNeck
Registered User
 
1972RedNeck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Townsend MT
Posts: 1,725
Re: engine vs. firewall

Quote:
Originally Posted by truckster View Post
it's tight, but an hei will fit a 4x4. Don't try to install it with the cap on.
x5
__________________
1966 F250 4X4 416
1972 K20 350 4 OTF
Quote:
Originally Posted by GASoline71 View Post
I once pulled an intake manifold for a cam swap... ended up with a full on drag car that ran in the 11's.
1972RedNeck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 09:24 PM   #9
Ironhorse
Senior Member
 
Ironhorse's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Wellington, Ks
Posts: 10,141
Re: engine vs. firewall

Just a thought but when I did my '71 4x4 (stock height and stock engine position) I used my original GM points distributor with the Petronix Igniter II HEI innards. Works great, uses the original points style cap with the "window" but looks stock. Being a 4x4 I just really did not think I had the room for a big GM HEI distributor. Just an option.
__________________
1971 Chevy 1/2T 4x4 LWB 350 V-8
Was sm465-now 350TH/np205
Tilt, Tach, Towhooks
Original Truck AM/FM
Wellington, Ks
Ironhorse is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 09:59 PM   #10
Ram-Man
Senior Member
 
Ram-Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 943
Re: engine vs. firewall

Isn't the stock small block location in the forward holes in the frame? I thought there was plenty room for a hei in this location.
__________________
Porterbuilt 8 Lugger
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=691739
Ram-Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 10:51 PM   #11
zicc1835
Senior Member
 
zicc1835's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Hanover NJ
Posts: 4,147
Re: engine vs. firewall

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ram-Man View Post
Isn't the stock small block location in the forward holes in the frame? I thought there was plenty room for a hei in this location.
thats my understanding
zicc1835 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 10:52 PM   #12
Sikorsky72
Registered User
 
Sikorsky72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 8
Re: engine vs. firewall

Thanks for everyone chiming in on my concern, I truly appreciate it! The HEI was TO tight for my liking and the valve cover had zero room on the passenger side. KWMEC, you pretty much nailed it! I don't have to worry about the fan shroud because of electric fans and new radiator. I liked your idea IRONHORSE, wish I would have had the foresight. Moving forward until the next "road block"
__________________
I'm not young enough to know everything.
Sikorsky72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2017, 10:55 PM   #13
Sikorsky72
Registered User
 
Sikorsky72's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Posts: 8
Re: engine vs. firewall

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ram-Man View Post
Isn't the stock small block location in the forward holes in the frame? I thought there was plenty room for a hei in this location.
Forward holes on the drivers side? Mine were on the back holes. As soon as I changed to the forward holes, no issues!
__________________
I'm not young enough to know everything.
Sikorsky72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2017, 08:57 AM   #14
palallin
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: St. James, MO
Posts: 1,239
Re: engine vs. firewall

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ram-Man View Post
Isn't the stock small block location in the forward holes in the frame? I thought there was plenty room for a hei in this location.
Rear holes for the 4x4. And an HEI fits; it's tight, but it fits. If it doesn't, I'll bet there's something else out of position.
__________________
'69 Longstep K-10: 327/SM465/T-221/Closed Knuckle Dana44/12-bolt.
palallin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2017, 10:37 AM   #15
57taskforce
All about them K’s
 
57taskforce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Farmington, New Mexico
Posts: 6,286
Re: engine vs. firewall

Quote:
Originally Posted by palallin View Post
Rear holes for the 4x4. And an HEI fits; it's tight, but it fits. If it doesn't, I'll bet there's something else out of position.
This.
__________________
Tyler
'57 3100 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=813888
'72 K20 Cheyenne http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=662879
‘69 K10 SWB http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=805206
'98 Silverado LT K2500HD ECLB Vortec 454/4l80E: 6" lift 315/75/16's
‘87 IROC-Z all original 50K mile survivor TPI 305 IROC Blue
‘10 Camaro 2SS/RS Aqua Blue Metallic #93 -version 2.0

Last edited by 57taskforce; 01-06-2017 at 10:53 AM.
57taskforce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2017, 11:06 AM   #16
BrianG
Registered User
 
BrianG's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Oakley, Michigan
Posts: 735
Re: engine vs. firewall

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sikorsky72 View Post
Thanks for everyone chiming in on my concern, I truly appreciate it! The HEI was TO tight for my liking and the valve cover had zero room on the passenger side. KWMEC, you pretty much nailed it! I don't have to worry about the fan shroud because of electric fans and new radiator. I liked your idea IRONHORSE, wish I would have had the foresight. Moving forward until the next "road block"
You may want to take a look at your body mounts. If they get really worn, the body can sag enough to make this even tighter. But... Yeah, they fit and if yours didn't then seems like something else must be contributing.
BrianG is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:21 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com