The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-14-2017, 06:24 PM   #1
Nima
Blue 67
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,179
Bellhousing differences

Is there a difference between 67 C20 bell housing with C10 or 68 and later models? If yes, can they be swapped? I am thinking about a transmission upgrade and I don't see much about 67 and/or C20s.
Thanks
__________________
1953 GMC 3/4 ton: current project
1967 C20: 5.3 voretc with T5 conversion, 4 wheel 8 lug disc brake
1972 Nova: my 4 door sport sedan! 5.3 voretc + T5 conversion. drivable project, FUN!!
1979 Camaro Z28: 5.3 vortec conversion with build TH350: drivable project, Fun to drive
1992 Camaro RS convertible (Z28 clone): 5.3 conversion with build T5: on going project
2005 Silverado 2500, 4x4 Duramax, original owner
Nima is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2017, 06:41 PM   #2
leftybass209
Registered User
 
leftybass209's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Modesto, CA
Posts: 2,189
Re: Bellhousing differences

Yes, they're the same. The frame is the same, as is the engine, body transmission, interior... etc. The differences are things like suspension ball joints, and bushings.
leftybass209 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2017, 06:48 PM   #3
'68OrangeSunshine
Senior Member
 
'68OrangeSunshine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Posts: 7,350
Re: Bellhousing differences

1967 model year was the last year for the SM420 4-speed Muncie transmission. The 420 [and 3-speed Saginaw, iinm] used the GM Bellhousing, p/n 3815891, with a 4-9/16'' opening.
1968 model year and later, used the SM465 4-speed Muncie, and had the GM p/n 3925505 bellhousing, with a 5-1/8'' opening.
So, no. You could have a machinist open up the smaller opening to 5-1/8'', but it might be easier and cheaper to find a '68 and later bellhousing, if you wanted a 465 tranny.
The 465 is longer than the 420, so either the tranny mounts would need to be moved or a 465 crossmember swapped over to use the later transmission.
But now I see you have a ''3-on-the-tree'' 3-speed Saginaw. So it may use the smaller diameter bellhousing even later than 1967...
I know something about 4-speeds, but the Saginaws are a mystery to me.
Sorry to add to the general confusion.
Either bellhousing will mount to an L6 or V8 Chevy engine. There are not different bellhousings per weight class, 10, 20, 30. One exterior size fits all.
__________________


Every 25 years I like to rebuild that 292, whether it needs it or not.
'68OrangeSunshine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2017, 08:21 PM   #4
Nima
Blue 67
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,179
Re: Bellhousing differences

Thank you very much.
__________________
1953 GMC 3/4 ton: current project
1967 C20: 5.3 voretc with T5 conversion, 4 wheel 8 lug disc brake
1972 Nova: my 4 door sport sedan! 5.3 voretc + T5 conversion. drivable project, FUN!!
1979 Camaro Z28: 5.3 vortec conversion with build TH350: drivable project, Fun to drive
1992 Camaro RS convertible (Z28 clone): 5.3 conversion with build T5: on going project
2005 Silverado 2500, 4x4 Duramax, original owner
Nima is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-14-2017, 10:53 PM   #5
Husker
Registered User
 
Husker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mid NE USA
Posts: 2,212
Re: Bellhousing differences

What tranny you swapping in? I am going to a T5 sometime soon.

Ron
__________________
Member #111
68 C-10 Daily Driver
70 4x4 Project
76 Jeep CJ-5

Help Support the Board:

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/payments.php


He who knows nothing is closer to the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.
Thomas Jefferson
Husker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2017, 12:00 AM   #6
Nima
Blue 67
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,179
Re: Bellhousing differences

That is were I am heading too. I am doing a lot reading to see what parts I need.
__________________
1953 GMC 3/4 ton: current project
1967 C20: 5.3 voretc with T5 conversion, 4 wheel 8 lug disc brake
1972 Nova: my 4 door sport sedan! 5.3 voretc + T5 conversion. drivable project, FUN!!
1979 Camaro Z28: 5.3 vortec conversion with build TH350: drivable project, Fun to drive
1992 Camaro RS convertible (Z28 clone): 5.3 conversion with build T5: on going project
2005 Silverado 2500, 4x4 Duramax, original owner
Nima is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2017, 02:13 AM   #7
'68OrangeSunshine
Senior Member
 
'68OrangeSunshine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Posts: 7,350
Re: Bellhousing differences

I don't think the T5 uses the older cast iron bellhousings.
__________________


Every 25 years I like to rebuild that 292, whether it needs it or not.
'68OrangeSunshine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2017, 08:13 AM   #8
LockDoc
The Older Generation


 
LockDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montezuma, Iowa
Posts: 25,591
Re: Bellhousing differences

-
If you haven't already, check this thread out.....

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=438224

LockDoc
__________________
Leon

Locksmith, Specializing In Antique Trucks, Automobiles, & Motorcycles

(My Dually Pickup Project Thread)

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=829820

-
LockDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2017, 03:48 PM   #9
Nima
Blue 67
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Western WA
Posts: 1,179
Re: Bellhousing differences

Quote:
Originally Posted by LockDoc View Post
-
If you haven't already, check this thread out.....

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=438224

LockDoc
Yes,I have. It is an excellent thread. Thanks.
__________________
1953 GMC 3/4 ton: current project
1967 C20: 5.3 voretc with T5 conversion, 4 wheel 8 lug disc brake
1972 Nova: my 4 door sport sedan! 5.3 voretc + T5 conversion. drivable project, FUN!!
1979 Camaro Z28: 5.3 vortec conversion with build TH350: drivable project, Fun to drive
1992 Camaro RS convertible (Z28 clone): 5.3 conversion with build T5: on going project
2005 Silverado 2500, 4x4 Duramax, original owner
Nima is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-15-2017, 10:21 PM   #10
Husker
Registered User
 
Husker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Mid NE USA
Posts: 2,212
Re: Bellhousing differences

Great Stuff here.
Ron
http://lugnutz65chevystepside.weebly...info-page.html
__________________
Member #111
68 C-10 Daily Driver
70 4x4 Project
76 Jeep CJ-5

Help Support the Board:

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/payments.php


He who knows nothing is closer to the truth than he whose mind is filled with falsehoods and errors.
Thomas Jefferson
Husker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2017, 07:48 AM   #11
Mike C
Registered User
 
Mike C's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 7,723
Re: Bellhousing differences

Quote:
Originally Posted by '68OrangeSunshine View Post
1
The 465 is longer than the 420, so either the tranny mounts would need to be moved or a 465 crossmember swapped over to use the later transmission.
Both of these transmissions hang off the bellhousing which is where the "rear" mounts are in these trucks.

Length of the trans won't affect mounts, but possibly require driveshaft mods.
__________________
44 Willys MB
52 M38A1
64 Corvette Coupe
68 Camaro 'vert LT1 & TH700
69 Z/28 355 12.6's @110
69 Chevy Short Step 4 1/2"/7" drop
72 Jimmy 4WD 4spd 4" & 35's
02 GMC 2500HD 4x4 Duramax
Mike C is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-16-2017, 05:09 PM   #12
'68OrangeSunshine
Senior Member
 
'68OrangeSunshine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Posts: 7,350
Re: Bellhousing differences

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mike C View Post
Both of these transmissions hang off the bellhousing which is where the "rear" mounts are in these trucks.

Length of the trans won't affect mounts, but possibly require driveshaft mods.
Thanks for clearing that up. I was just thinking out loud.
Personally, I'm happy with the dependable SM465. A buddy had a T5 in his S/10 and we were always pulling that thing out for repair. [Although one time it was his differential that was making noise and the tranny was OK.] So I don't trust manual trannies that use ATF instead of good 'ole 90 weight.
I could be tempted by an A833, if one ever comes my way. But I'm used to the Muncie 4-speed. Hyd clutches are another device that I recall an acquaintance constantly moaning over, too. I've had the '68 Stepside since 1973 and the '71 4x4 Jimmy since 1995, so I'm an old dog, and set in my ways.
[In response to your comment: the 4WD SM465/NP205, does mount to a crossmember on the [K/5] K/1500, but I'd have to crawl under the C/10 to verify if that's true of 2WDs, so I'll just take your word for it.]
__________________


Every 25 years I like to rebuild that 292, whether it needs it or not.
'68OrangeSunshine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 09:53 PM   #13
BigTopGT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33311
Posts: 101
Re: Bellhousing differences

Bringing this back from the dead for some advice:

I've got a starter pad broken on th bellhousing in my 67 and have a 68 (on the title) parts truck available.

Broken bellhousing is P/N GM9 3815891

The spare is GM5 3925505

Both trucks had a 3 speed, though the broken one was on the floor and the spare was on the tree.

Can anyone confirm them as interchangeable or do I need a new bellhousing entirely? (pics should be uploading)

Thanks in advance, fellas.
BigTopGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 10:19 PM   #14
geezer#99
Registered User
 
geezer#99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bowser
Posts: 13,667
Re: Bellhousing differences

They don’t interchange.
Different size opening where the trans input bearing housing fits.
Post #3 has the info for that.
geezer#99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 10:23 PM   #15
BigTopGT
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: Fort Lauderdale, Florida 33311
Posts: 101
Re: Bellhousing differences

Quote:
Originally Posted by geezer#99 View Post
They don’t interchange.
Different size opening where the trans input bearing housing fits.
Post #3 has the info for that.
Thanks.

I was hoping the fact that I had two 3 speeds that it'd work.

Never easy, is it?

Last edited by LockDoc; 03-18-2020 at 11:37 PM. Reason: You have to be a premium member to post a Want To Buy
BigTopGT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-18-2020, 11:38 PM   #16
geezer#99
Registered User
 
geezer#99's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bowser
Posts: 13,667
Re: Bellhousing differences

There is a way to use a 505 bellhousing with your trans.
Use a spacer ring like this.

https://www.advanceadapters.com/prod...-down-to-4686/
geezer#99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com