Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
07-07-2017, 01:32 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Matamoras, PA
Posts: 397
|
History of the C10 suspension
I'm sure there is a thread buried somewhere in here, but who knows about the rear trailing arm design? Who designed it, when and why? It is such a unique thing, how the arms are angled into the center of the truck.
My dad, who is notorious for over analyzing everything, is always perplexed by the design. But he got me thinking about it. The rear end will slightly shift side to side, but it moves like a pendulum. Maybe this actually helps handle turns, by shifting the wheel on the outside of the turn back ever so slightly, and the inside wheel forward. And for launching, the force from the wheels moves through the trailing arms to the center of the truck to push it, maybe another advantage over leaf springs. |
07-07-2017, 01:52 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,374
|
Re: History of the C10 suspension
I'm interested to see the responses to this one myself. I don't have much to add, other than this bit from the 1972 trucks flyer --
__________________
1972 C10 LWB, 350/350 Deconstruction began 5/2009, mostly completed restoration, 5/2017 |
07-07-2017, 04:06 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Campbellsville, KY
Posts: 888
|
Re: History of the C10 suspension
Hmmm - never thought about those merits, but it's worth considering. I just know it rides gooood.
__________________
Alex V. ------ 1967 C10 Suburban, 350/NP435, Green/Green, PS, PB, HD cooling, charging, shocks, and springs. 1985 GMC C3500 SRW, Sierra Classic, 454/TH400, white/blue. |
07-07-2017, 04:13 PM | #4 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Posts: 7,504
|
Re: History of the C10 suspension
Wonder why the brochure talks about the rear end, but illustrates a front end with steering linkage?
__________________
Every 25 years I like to rebuild that 292, whether it needs it or not. |
07-07-2017, 04:43 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 1,374
|
Re: History of the C10 suspension
Oh, I just cut out a small part of a big picture.
__________________
1972 C10 LWB, 350/350 Deconstruction began 5/2009, mostly completed restoration, 5/2017 |
07-07-2017, 06:36 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: west coast
Posts: 3,396
|
Re: History of the C10 suspension
Don't know who designed it, but, more of why it was designed, a smoother ride. First appeared on 1960 2wd 1/2 and 3/4 ton pickups, but 1 tons continued to use leaf springs for heavier duty work. The coil system you see on 67-72 Chevy pickups is basically the same system that was introduced in '63 ( see photo ).
|
07-07-2017, 07:40 PM | #7 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Posts: 7,504
|
Re: History of the C10 suspension
OK. I thought it was a result of a Three Martini Lunch corporate culture in the Ad Dept...
__________________
Every 25 years I like to rebuild that 292, whether it needs it or not. |
07-07-2017, 07:42 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: 9
Posts: 862
|
Re: History of the C10 suspension
I think Nascar uses the same basic design, if I'm not mistaken I think some people have even used some Nascar style trailing arms on a C10
|
07-08-2017, 07:16 AM | #9 |
Six in a row makes it go...
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Vacationland: Maine
Posts: 1,346
|
Re: History of the C10 suspension
Yeah - it's my understanding that NASCAR has used the trailing arm rear suspension for quite some time. I also remember seeing a kit that would let you put them under your Chevelle too.
__________________
67 C20 long step resto: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=342086 66 C10 long step build: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=1#post3814790 CT to Alaska in a 67 C10: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=399224 “The height of sophistication is simplicity." - Clare Boothe Luce |
Bookmarks |
|
|