The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


View Poll Results: Motor Options
Stick with the LS3 32 71.11%
4bt Cummins 13 28.89%
Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-24-2017, 10:49 PM   #1
Jmh68C10
Registered User
 
Jmh68C10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Richmond Va
Posts: 68
Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins

I am mid build on my c10 project. Using all porterbuilt suspension and a ls engine swap. (you know the same thing everyone seems to be doing) so I got the idea of changing it up and using a 4bt Cummins for my engine. Biggest issue I see from first glance would probably be the oil pan needed modification to fit with the drop member. Just brain storming....
__________________
68 c10- Under construction
Jmh68C10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2017, 02:54 PM   #2
Dmaxmoe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 22
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins

I didn’t vote because I’m not driving yet, but pretty much went through this same thing minus the drop member part. I’ve read of 1 or 2 guys on here that went 4bt and didn’t like it so went duramax, who knows their setup or the health of the engine for them to not have like it though.

Im just getting ready to drop my p-pump 4bt into my 69, hopefully be driving mid nov. I chose 4bt because I don’t want any extra electronics, it’s a summer driver, noise doesn’t bother me, and it will be way different. Semi built 4bt with properly sized compounds, moderately fueled and pump dialed in should be more then enough. I’m sure you could get creative with the oil pan if you go that route.

It’s all in your expectations and wether or not you’re at all familiar with diesels, don’t expect an easy 400 hp out of the little cummins either. Check out 4bt swaps, they aren’t too heavy in the hp chasing over there, but a few have taken them pretty far.
Dmaxmoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-25-2017, 08:56 PM   #3
BCOWANWHEELS
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: KINGSPORT,TN.
Posts: 3,035
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins

A 4bt is very noisey, very tall and super heavy not to mention very costly. I have 6 of them so i know.
__________________
I BELIEVE IN JOHN 3:16
BCOWANWHEELS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2017, 01:50 PM   #4
cypressbog
Go Pack Go!
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Green Bay
Posts: 2,669
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins

I'm not sure how anyone could compare the two. Stick with the LS.
cypressbog is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2017, 02:23 PM   #5
JustToxic
Registered User
 
JustToxic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Elkhart, Indiana
Posts: 292
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins

Unless your building a 4x4 or a rat rod truck, I'd keep the LS.
__________________
1967 Chevy C20 to K20 Conversion "Simply Toxic"
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=749409

1971 Chevy C20 Custom Camper LS Swap http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=763775
JustToxic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2017, 03:25 PM   #6
Tomo
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Indiana
Posts: 211
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins

Way out of my price range but maybe something to consider

Cummins' new 2.8 crate engine
https://cumminsengines.com/repower.aspx
Tomo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2017, 04:12 PM   #7
randy500
Account Suspended
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 6,873
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tomo View Post
Way out of my price range but maybe something to consider

Cummins' new 2.8 crate engine
https://cumminsengines.com/repower.aspx
That’s a cool engine...
randy500 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-26-2017, 04:45 PM   #8
Kw69
Registered User
 
Kw69's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 111
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins

I like both, but the LS will be an easier swap from what I can gather. Regardless keep us in the loop with pics when u do it!
__________________
2009 GMC 2500HD 6.0, 6 speed auto, stealth grey, 4x4 Z71, Bilsteins, Black Bear Tuned. Pulls the 10k fifth wheel all so easy.
1969 CST 350 black long bed, 3 on the floor, PS, AC, drum brakes, old school and love it.
Kw69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2017, 12:44 AM   #9
HO455
Post Whore
 
HO455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 10,975
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins

The first thing I have to ask is... Is the Porterbuilt front end up the the task of living under the 4BT? Please don't feel I'm bashing the Porterbuilt equipment but it is asking a lot. Those engines are easily 750 pounds without things like radiators or A/C.
__________________
Thanks to Bob and Jeanie and everyone else at Superior Performance for all their great help.
RIP Bob Parks.
1967 Burban (the WMB),1988 S10 Blazer (the Stink10 II),1969 GTO (the Goat), 1970 Javelin, 1952 F2 Ford OHC six 4X4, 29 Model A, 72 Firebird (the DBP Bird). 85 Alfa Romeo
If it breaks I didn't want it in the first place
The WMB repair thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=698377
HO455 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2017, 01:19 AM   #10
Dmaxmoe
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 22
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins

The 4bt is heavy for sure, listed at around 750lbs wet, but the big blocks that came in these generations of trucks are listed at 650-685 dry, so according to the internet, not all that different. Obviosuly no comparison if we are talking aluminum blocks/heads.
Dmaxmoe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2017, 05:50 AM   #11
hamjet
Registered User
 
hamjet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: South Westerlo, New York
Posts: 1,325
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins

I say go for the cummins, if you're looking for a challenge or just want to be different and can afford it, then go for it. might be a lot of work but when done, what a looker....((( its amazing, I just went to other sites I look at and nothing but cummins advertisements on them just because I typed the word 'cummins')))
__________________
Thanks, Joe..
1969 C/10, 348 C.I., 3X2 bbl. V8, 2004r , LWB.

Last edited by hamjet; 10-27-2017 at 06:06 AM.
hamjet is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-27-2017, 01:44 PM   #12
trac209
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 1,107
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins

4bt would be a cool swap and a step above the general LS style one. May cost a bit more but the longevity of the Diesel engine far outweighs the savings of an LS.
trac209 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-28-2017, 09:53 PM   #13
bill3rail
Registered User
 
bill3rail's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: LI, NY 11801
Posts: 1,140
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins

I voted for the Cummins as I want one myself. Different from everything else out there!

Bill
__________________
1970 C10 8' Fleetside, L6 250, 3 on the Tree.
The most basic of pickup trucks!
bill3rail is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com