Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
View Poll Results: Motor Options | |||
Stick with the LS3 | 32 | 71.11% | |
4bt Cummins | 13 | 28.89% | |
Voters: 45. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-24-2017, 10:49 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2016
Location: Richmond Va
Posts: 68
|
Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins
I am mid build on my c10 project. Using all porterbuilt suspension and a ls engine swap. (you know the same thing everyone seems to be doing) so I got the idea of changing it up and using a 4bt Cummins for my engine. Biggest issue I see from first glance would probably be the oil pan needed modification to fit with the drop member. Just brain storming....
__________________
68 c10- Under construction |
10-25-2017, 02:54 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 22
|
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins
I didn’t vote because I’m not driving yet, but pretty much went through this same thing minus the drop member part. I’ve read of 1 or 2 guys on here that went 4bt and didn’t like it so went duramax, who knows their setup or the health of the engine for them to not have like it though.
Im just getting ready to drop my p-pump 4bt into my 69, hopefully be driving mid nov. I chose 4bt because I don’t want any extra electronics, it’s a summer driver, noise doesn’t bother me, and it will be way different. Semi built 4bt with properly sized compounds, moderately fueled and pump dialed in should be more then enough. I’m sure you could get creative with the oil pan if you go that route. It’s all in your expectations and wether or not you’re at all familiar with diesels, don’t expect an easy 400 hp out of the little cummins either. Check out 4bt swaps, they aren’t too heavy in the hp chasing over there, but a few have taken them pretty far. |
10-25-2017, 08:56 PM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: KINGSPORT,TN.
Posts: 3,035
|
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins
A 4bt is very noisey, very tall and super heavy not to mention very costly. I have 6 of them so i know.
__________________
I BELIEVE IN JOHN 3:16 |
10-26-2017, 01:50 PM | #4 |
Go Pack Go!
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Green Bay
Posts: 2,669
|
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins
I'm not sure how anyone could compare the two. Stick with the LS.
|
10-26-2017, 02:23 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Elkhart, Indiana
Posts: 292
|
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins
Unless your building a 4x4 or a rat rod truck, I'd keep the LS.
__________________
1967 Chevy C20 to K20 Conversion "Simply Toxic" http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=749409 1971 Chevy C20 Custom Camper LS Swap http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=763775 |
10-26-2017, 03:25 PM | #6 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Indiana
Posts: 213
|
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins
Way out of my price range but maybe something to consider
Cummins' new 2.8 crate engine https://cumminsengines.com/repower.aspx |
10-26-2017, 04:12 PM | #7 | |
Account Suspended
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 6,873
|
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins
Quote:
|
|
10-26-2017, 04:45 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Florida
Posts: 111
|
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins
I like both, but the LS will be an easier swap from what I can gather. Regardless keep us in the loop with pics when u do it!
__________________
2009 GMC 2500HD 6.0, 6 speed auto, stealth grey, 4x4 Z71, Bilsteins, Black Bear Tuned. Pulls the 10k fifth wheel all so easy. 1969 CST 350 black long bed, 3 on the floor, PS, AC, drum brakes, old school and love it. |
10-27-2017, 12:44 AM | #9 |
Post Whore
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,393
|
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins
The first thing I have to ask is... Is the Porterbuilt front end up the the task of living under the 4BT? Please don't feel I'm bashing the Porterbuilt equipment but it is asking a lot. Those engines are easily 750 pounds without things like radiators or A/C.
__________________
Thanks to Bob and Jeanie and everyone else at Superior Performance for all their great help. RIP Bob Parks. 1967 Burban (the WMB),1988 S10 Blazer (the Stink10 II),1969 GTO (the Goat), 1970 Javelin, 1952 F2 Ford OHC six 4X4, 29 Model A, 72 Firebird (the DBP Bird). 85 Alfa Romeo If it breaks I didn't want it in the first place The WMB repair thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=698377 |
10-27-2017, 01:19 AM | #10 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Calgary, Alberta
Posts: 22
|
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins
The 4bt is heavy for sure, listed at around 750lbs wet, but the big blocks that came in these generations of trucks are listed at 650-685 dry, so according to the internet, not all that different. Obviosuly no comparison if we are talking aluminum blocks/heads.
|
10-27-2017, 05:50 AM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: South Westerlo, New York
Posts: 1,325
|
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins
I say go for the cummins, if you're looking for a challenge or just want to be different and can afford it, then go for it. might be a lot of work but when done, what a looker....((( its amazing, I just went to other sites I look at and nothing but cummins advertisements on them just because I typed the word 'cummins')))
__________________
Thanks, Joe.. 1969 C/10, 348 C.I., 3X2 bbl. V8, 2004r , LWB. Last edited by hamjet; 10-27-2017 at 06:06 AM. |
10-27-2017, 01:44 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: winnipeg
Posts: 1,107
|
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins
4bt would be a cool swap and a step above the general LS style one. May cost a bit more but the longevity of the Diesel engine far outweighs the savings of an LS.
|
10-28-2017, 09:53 PM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: LI, NY 11801
Posts: 1,140
|
Re: Ls3 vs. 4bt Cummins
I voted for the Cummins as I want one myself. Different from everything else out there!
Bill
__________________
1970 C10 8' Fleetside, L6 250, 3 on the Tree. The most basic of pickup trucks! |
Bookmarks |
|
|