The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 11-01-2019, 02:42 PM   #1
Lord_glum
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Illinois
Posts: 40
68 frame question

Got my performance online engine mounts for the swap and ran into an issue. Seems my frame is too wide where they mount to the top of the frame. I see in pictures some frames are thinner there so the mounts bolt up. Is this something to do with it being a six cylinder frame?

Last edited by Lord_glum; 11-01-2019 at 05:52 PM.
Lord_glum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2019, 04:13 PM   #2
AussieinNC
Moderator
 
AussieinNC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Cherryville, NC
Posts: 2,172
Re: 68 frame question

Here is your pic at a reduced size...

Nice work on that chassis !

I assume you are referring to the width of the top rail on the frame....

Maybe post another pic with a tape measure across the top of the rail so we can see the width....

One question for you...the upper A arm pivot bolts thru the chassis...are they captive within the chassis? If not, they will be difficult to loosen for alignment purposes.....just wondering...

Attached Images
 
__________________
Family and country before all others...

2006 Chevy Silverado (Daily Driver)
2012 Chevy Equinox

AussieinNC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2019, 05:51 PM   #3
Lord_glum
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Illinois
Posts: 40
Re: 68 frame question

Thanks for the compliment.

The frame is 2.5” from lip to the outside of the rail.

The bolts are captive. It’s the qa1 setup.

Thanks for the resize as well.
Lord_glum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2019, 08:27 PM   #4
firedemon
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: @
Posts: 890
Re: 68 frame question

mine was a 6 and they went right in so im not sure what the deal is
firedemon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2019, 08:51 PM   #5
Lord_glum
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Illinois
Posts: 40
Re: 68 frame question

Here is another picture.

Lord_glum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-01-2019, 10:41 PM   #6
KMC3420
Registered User
 
KMC3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Harrison, AR
Posts: 1,069
Re: 68 frame question

It appears you need the POL wide mounts. They have two sets. One for wide frame rails and one for narrow frame rails. Do you recall which part number you purchased? From my understanding some 68’s have the wide frame and some narrow, possibly a change over year. Could you possibly have a 67 frame?

Wide Frame

Narrow Frame
__________________
Keagan
68 SWB C-10 original 350 A/C 503 Mean Green
KMC3420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2019, 04:42 PM   #7
Lord_glum
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Illinois
Posts: 40
Re: 68 frame question

It’s a 68 frame according to the stamp and the tags.

I didn’t know the had a wide version of the mounts. I assume you are talking about the 67 and earlier mounts?
Lord_glum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2019, 04:50 PM   #8
Jason Banks
Senior Member
 
Jason Banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: TX
Posts: 1,542
Re: 68 frame question

Yes he's talking about the 67 and earlier mounts.

For some reason many of the early 68 trucks are more like the 67. Have you tried to put a power steering gear box on that frame yet? I would bet it doesn't have the dimple in the frame to allow the box to sit flush. I also have a 1968 that has the wide rails like yours and does not have the dimple for the gear box. Build date on my 1968 is October 28th, 1967 and was built in Fremont, CA.
Jason Banks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2019, 04:53 PM   #9
Lord_glum
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Illinois
Posts: 40
Re: 68 frame question

Looking at pictures of 67 frames and it seems to be what I have.
Let me see about the dimple. Thanks for the heads up.
Lord_glum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2019, 05:38 PM   #10
Lord_glum
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Illinois
Posts: 40
Re: 68 frame question

Pic of my frame.

Lord_glum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2019, 05:43 PM   #11
Jason Banks
Senior Member
 
Jason Banks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: TX
Posts: 1,542
Re: 68 frame question

Sure doesn't look like you have the dimple. Are you planning on power steering? Have you got the steering gear yet?

here's a thread about the dimple.

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=545971

There are lots of discussion threads about this. I used spacers on my 1968. I milled them down to be the absolute bare minimum to keep the box sitting right. Other people talk about heating up the frame and hammering it in.
Jason Banks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2019, 06:58 PM   #12
BigBird05
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: Cheraw
Posts: 1,305
Re: 68 frame question

An engineer would right a change order to the factory to use up existing 67 frames at the start of 1968 production to avoid scrapping them.
BigBird05 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-02-2019, 07:07 PM   #13
Lord_glum
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Illinois
Posts: 40
Re: 68 frame question

So here is the steering box the truck came with. I may be wrong but thought this was a power steering box. It bolts right up minus needing to notch the radiator support to make it fit.


Last edited by Lord_glum; 11-02-2019 at 08:05 PM.
Lord_glum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2019, 10:15 AM   #14
KMC3420
Registered User
 
KMC3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Harrison, AR
Posts: 1,069
Re: 68 frame question

Yes, that is your steering gear box. It will physically mount up to your frame on the frame bosses. The only area I would double check is the area below in the red box, make sure it’s not hitting your frame prior to the 4 bolts being tightened completely. Your frame doesn’t appear to have the indent in the frame that indents towards the passenger side.
Attached Images
  
__________________
Keagan
68 SWB C-10 original 350 A/C 503 Mean Green

Last edited by KMC3420; 11-03-2019 at 10:36 AM.
KMC3420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2019, 03:34 PM   #15
Lord_glum
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Illinois
Posts: 40
Re: 68 frame question

Well @&&$&@. Hacked the core support mount and test fit the box and sure enough. Looks to be 1/8” gap. Leaned all kinds of new info this weekend.
Lord_glum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2019, 06:58 PM   #16
KMC3420
Registered User
 
KMC3420's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Harrison, AR
Posts: 1,069
Re: 68 frame question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord_glum View Post
Well @&&$&@. Hacked the core support mount and test fit the box and sure enough. Looks to be 1/8” gap. Leaned all kinds of new info this weekend.
Small setback. Sounds like 1/8” spacers will get it secured in the correct location. The only part that sucks is cutting on already painted/coated parts. Your frame looks great. Keep at it.
__________________
Keagan
68 SWB C-10 original 350 A/C 503 Mean Green
KMC3420 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2019, 09:26 PM   #17
notsolo
Registered User
 
notsolo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Md
Posts: 2,458
Smile Re: 68 frame question

Back to your question, Don't know about 6cyl trucks...I think you can just notch out for the new motor mounts. Mine, photo's of a 71, different, thinner on top......You probably should box the whole frame anyways, since it looks like your building a rocket sled.
Attached Images
  
notsolo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2019, 09:47 PM   #18
LockDoc
The Older Generation


 
LockDoc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Montezuma, Iowa
Posts: 25,393
Re: 68 frame question

Quote:
Originally Posted by Lord_glum View Post
Got my performance online engine mounts for the swap and ran into an issue. Seems my frame is too wide where they mount to the top of the frame. I see in pictures some frames are thinner there so the mounts bolt up. Is this something to do with it being a six cylinder frame?

I had to narrow mine to use the POL brackets. The passengers side bracket did not fit worth a crap.....

See post #31 in this thread:

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=656107&page=2

Mine had a six in it but I'm not sure that makes a difference.

LockDoc
__________________
Leon

Locksmith, Specializing In Antique Trucks, Automobiles, & Motorcycles

(My Dually Pickup Project Thread)

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=829820

-
LockDoc is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-03-2019, 10:42 PM   #19
Lord_glum
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Illinois
Posts: 40
Re: 68 frame question

Thanks for the help everyone. I’m fairly certain I have a left over 67 frame on my 68. I’m assuming the 67 engine mounts will work.
Lord_glum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-04-2019, 02:09 PM   #20
Lord_glum
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Illinois
Posts: 40
Re: 68 frame question

Side question, it looks like I can get by with CP50014 steering box with no dimples as long as I have the raised “bosses” on my frame.
Lord_glum is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com