Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
12-02-2020, 09:33 AM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
68 C10 Lowering dilemma
I need some suggestions lowering my 68 C10 short bed. I bought this truck the way you see it in the pictures. The front has Russell (never heard of them and can't get any info on them) drop spindles and the rear (coil springs) has 2 inch lowering blocks. The dilemma is I want to get rid of the lowering blocks but I'm not sure if it was lowered with just the blocks or blocks and springs. If I order new springs to replace the blocks it's a 2 inch drop but if I assume the springs and blocks were used and order the wrong springs I'm stuck with them.
According to the LMC Truck catalog it looks like the front was dropped 2-1/2 inches and the rear either 3 or 4 inches?? Here is the front. [/IMG] Here is the rear What I'm asking is what does this front and rear drop look like to you? If the back looks like a 4 inch drop I'll remove the 2 inch lowering blocks and install 4 inch drop springs. Any suggestions are appreciated. |
12-02-2020, 10:12 AM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 10-Uh-See
Posts: 5,609
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Can you take pics of the rear springs? Also, can we see a whole sideshot of the truck?
If you like the way it looks, why change it? Does it ride bad, or do you just want it lowered properly? Keep in mind that going to a 4" spring may require shorter shocks and shock relocation brackets for better ride quality. FWIW, I wouldn't order anything from LMC. Try www.azproperformance.com
__________________
|
12-02-2020, 12:41 PM | #3 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Quote:
Thanks |
|
12-02-2020, 01:56 PM | #4 | |
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: China Spring, TX
Posts: 7,280
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Quote:
__________________
Master Chief, US Navy, Retired 1964 C10 Step-side Short Bed - In Progress 2009 2500HD Duramax LTZ 1948 GMC Panel 1956 Big Window Stepside 1953 5 Window Chevy Stepside 1932 Coupe New Seat Foam for Bench Seats? |
|
12-02-2020, 03:25 PM | #5 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
|
12-02-2020, 03:31 PM | #6 | |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pine Ridge Florida
Posts: 4,135
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Quote:
Even if the trailing arms are closer to the ground with the blocks they are in line with the tires and shouldn't hit anything unless it goes between your tires. Speed bumps etc should not be a problem. I really don't have a clue and am in the planning stages of mine. If I feel the trailing arms really are too low I may swap to a 1" block? Personally I want as much suspension travel as possible and no C notch.
__________________
Click on my Not really a build thread, yet NOT SO RUST FREE RUST FREE BLAZER LS ENGINE SWAP INFORMATION THREAD BOLT RESTORATIONS 4l60 to an NP205 |
|
12-02-2020, 03:51 PM | #7 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Quote:
|
|
12-02-2020, 04:02 PM | #8 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Pine Ridge Florida
Posts: 4,135
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Just blocks shouldn't get you that low. From what I have been reading (I am new to 2 wheel drive suspensions) you can go about 5" before needing a notch.
Take another picture of how close to the floor your differential is? Again from what I have been reading even with a C notch there isn't much more travel before the differential hits the bottom of the floor.
__________________
Click on my Not really a build thread, yet NOT SO RUST FREE RUST FREE BLAZER LS ENGINE SWAP INFORMATION THREAD BOLT RESTORATIONS 4l60 to an NP205 |
12-02-2020, 04:13 PM | #9 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Quote:
According to the pictures in the catalog above and the picture of my truck at the rear it looks like I have a 3 inch drop??? Last edited by GMJimmy; 12-02-2020 at 04:32 PM. |
|
12-02-2020, 04:41 PM | #10 |
67-72 parts collector,…
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,701
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Post a picture of your rear springs. What I see are coils that are touching each other. This means someone heated the springs.
__________________
Keith Convert to disc brakes. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823 |
12-02-2020, 04:54 PM | #11 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
|
12-02-2020, 05:41 PM | #12 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 10-Uh-See
Posts: 5,609
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Something seems way off here! I had 6" drop springs, and .75" blocks on my 68 before changing to coilovers. I had removed the bumpstops, but still had plenty of frame clearance. There's no way a 4" drop should be hitting the bumpstops.
Can you post of full side shot of the truck?
__________________
|
12-02-2020, 05:44 PM | #13 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 10-Uh-See
Posts: 5,609
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
What size wheels/tires are on the truck?
__________________
|
12-02-2020, 05:49 PM | #14 |
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: 10-Uh-See
Posts: 5,609
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
I'm thinking you may have a 4/6 drop.
Take a stroll through this thread to see what looks like you have instead of comparing to that inaccurate LMC rendering. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...=430300&page=2
__________________
|
12-02-2020, 05:59 PM | #15 |
67-72 parts collector,…
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,701
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Sorry. Not sure what I saw in the last picture.
__________________
Keith Convert to disc brakes. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823 |
12-02-2020, 05:59 PM | #16 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Carlos MN
Posts: 2,138
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Per your pic above if you remove the lowering block your axle assembly will lower (raising the truck) the thickness of the block. In your case 2". But the trailing arm will remain the same distance from the ground. The trailing arm to ground distance is determined by the wheel and tire combo you are running. I think I got that right. Others can chime in if I'm incorrect.
I'm running a a 5.5" drop in the rear. 4" springs with 2" blocks. My frame is c-notched. I added a 1/2" spacer under the rear spring to give me the rake I wanted. Bell Tech 4" springs. If you have enough threads on the u-bolt or if you don't adding a bunch temporary washers I'd try removing the 2" block and see if that works for you. |
12-02-2020, 06:05 PM | #17 | |
67-72 parts collector,…
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Mid-MO
Posts: 22,701
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Quote:
To the OP,... those look like 5” or 6” drop springs.
__________________
Keith Convert to disc brakes. http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=444823 |
|
12-02-2020, 07:36 PM | #18 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
|
12-02-2020, 07:48 PM | #19 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Quote:
I know for sure I have stock springs in the front because I bought them and installed them. I tried with NO LUCK to identify the front drop spindles. The casting says RUSSELL. Everyone I spoke with in the industry says they've never heard of them. Obviously they were around but where? Here is another view. Another thing I have to change is the angle of the panhard bar. Last edited by GMJimmy; 12-02-2020 at 08:43 PM. |
|
12-02-2020, 09:17 PM | #20 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Quote:
Last edited by GMJimmy; 12-02-2020 at 09:57 PM. |
|
12-03-2020, 11:38 AM | #21 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Quote:
Something to be aware of & understand. Also, for the Panhard bar, extend the frame mount lower vs. changing the bracket on the rear housing. At or slightly below the axle centerline & parallel to the road would be better vs. above the centerline (how they were originally).
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
12-03-2020, 12:18 PM | #22 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Quote:
I'm well aware of the shock issue. I may just install the c notch kit for now and worry about the removal of the lowering blocks later. I agree that I should lower the banhard bar bracket on the frame. Are there weld on brackets available or do I have to fabricate one? Thanks Jim |
|
12-03-2020, 01:11 PM | #23 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: DALLAS,TX
Posts: 22,068
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Quote:
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=368476
__________________
67SWB-B.B.RetroRod 64SWB-Recycle 89CCDually-Driver/Tow Truck 99CCSWB Driver All Fleetsides @rattlecankustoms in IG Building a small, high rpm engine with the perfect bore, stroke and rod ratio is very impressive. It's like a highly skilled Morrocan sword fighter with a Damascus Steel Scimitar..... Cubic inches is like Indiana Jones with a cheap pistol. |
|
12-03-2020, 09:09 PM | #24 | |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Quote:
|
|
12-04-2020, 07:09 PM | #25 |
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 164
|
Re: 68 C10 Lowering dilemma
Does anybody want to take a crack at what the drop is and who the manufacturer of these spindles is?
The casting says Russell. |
Bookmarks |
|
|