The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 12-22-2003, 04:57 AM   #1
dinnut
Registered User
 
dinnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: missouri city, tx
Posts: 4,486
Question which camshaft?

sometime next year im going to put a new intake carb and cam on/in my engine. im wondering which cam people are using and liking.

im looking at either
A. edelbrock performer-plus camshaft 278 intake/288 exhaust duration


B. comp cams 270h camshaft
270H Magnum™ is a great cam for high performance driving in street machines. The 270H has a rough idle in small blocks and a noticeable idle in big blocks. This is the largest cam you can use with a stock torque converter. The 270H will not affect power accessories, but should be used with headers and a 4 BBL. carburetor. This is the perfect cam for cruising.
(fromthis page)


C. crane cams Energizer 272 H10
Good idle, daily usage, off road, highway towing, fuel efficiency plus performance, 2600-3000 cruise RPM, 8.75 to 10.0 compression ratio advised. (50 state legal, pre-computer, C.A.R.B. E.O. D-225-21) Basic RPM 2000-5000 (#3 from here )

which one? or should i use a different one? the engine has headers and hei and will have a edelbrock performer rpm and 600 cfm edelbrock when updated with this camshaft
__________________
70 longbed
496/th400/Ford 9"

Last edited by dinnut; 12-23-2003 at 12:57 AM.
dinnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2003, 05:07 AM   #2
Rooster's 67
Registered User
 
Rooster's 67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: DFW
Posts: 765
comp or the crane IMO.
I have run the comp 270 in a 355 SB with 441 heads 2.02/1.60 10:1 flats and a performer intake, TH350 with a saturday night special 4.1:1 gears all in a 64SWB Damn thing would nearly pull the left front up. (it was lowered 3/5)
__________________
The problem with America is stupidity. I'm not saying there should be a capital punishment for stupidity, but why don't we just take the safety labels off of everything and let the problem solve itself?
Rooster's 67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2003, 11:10 AM   #3
bigjimzlll
Senior Member
 
bigjimzlll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Redding,CA...USA
Posts: 4,736
stock converter? if so the crane...if you have a 2000-2500 stall then the 270H magnum
__________________
It's called "drag racing" if they called it "tic..tic..WHAM!..BANG! F*&K!!!", they'd have to keep the magazines under the counter with the other men's publications

click the clicky to join the site....
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/payments.php


67 lwb..first hotrod in 25 years..540 best ET is 9.45 @ 141.44
Anderson,CA
bigjimzlll is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2003, 11:24 AM   #4
Tx Firefighter
Watch out for your cornhole !
 
Tx Firefighter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Azle, Texas
Posts: 14,162
My favorite cam in the world is Comp 270H.

I use them with stock converters and power brakes just fine.

My orange truck has a Goodwrench crate engine with Comp 270, Performer RPM intake, Hooker headers and Holley 600 vac sec carb. 3.73 gears and a 700R4. Runs killer. It should have more compression for that cam, but it runs great with the low compression. The deep gears compensate for any loss of low end torque.
__________________
I'm on the Instagram- @Gearhead_Kevin
Tx Firefighter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2003, 09:58 PM   #5
dinnut
Registered User
 
dinnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: missouri city, tx
Posts: 4,486
sounds like you are running what i am going to run tx firefighter except with a edelbrock... and my old engine instead of a crate. and maybe a th400 instead of a 700r4
__________________
70 longbed
496/th400/Ford 9"
dinnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2003, 09:59 PM   #6
DanoDMano
Pronounced "Pew-al-up"
 
DanoDMano's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Puyallup, Washington
Posts: 845
I installed an Edelbrock like you mentioned, and liked it. But when I replace it next time it will be with a Comp cam!! I have heard great things about them.
__________________
Classic GM Trucks of Washington Club Member



1970 FS chevy,350/350, Edelbrock cam and intake. Holley 650 carb,HEI,AT,Tangier Orange, 18's,
Power Locks,

Truck Photos
DanoDMano is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2003, 10:02 PM   #7
dinnut
Registered User
 
dinnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: missouri city, tx
Posts: 4,486
hmm the comp is getting good reviews. thats the one i want actually because its the biggest for stock converter and slightly rough idle. and wont affect power accesories...
__________________
70 longbed
496/th400/Ford 9"
dinnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2003, 11:04 PM   #8
GMC JUNKIE TOO
THE QUICKER FIXERUPER
 
GMC JUNKIE TOO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Ok
Posts: 615
Comp cams are the best, Look at the xe lineup they use the latest technology I have an xe 274 and love it I had an edelbrock rpm until two lobes went flat.
GMC JUNKIE TOO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-22-2003, 11:22 PM   #9
WRMZ71
Cause the Chicks DIG IT!!
 
WRMZ71's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Beaufort SC
Posts: 509
Might want to look into the summit cams as well if you're on a tight budget. They have the matching spec's for the edelbrock performer rpm intake and cam combo in there camshafts. They also have the same thing as you're (biggest cam with stock converter cam) I've gone with 2 summit cams, (the two i've mentioned) I haven't had a problem with either. I just went to the bigger one cause i got the performer rpm intake and i wanted the matching camshaft
WRMZ71 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2003, 12:51 AM   #10
dinnut
Registered User
 
dinnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: missouri city, tx
Posts: 4,486
Quote:
Originally posted by WRMZ71
Might want to look into the summit cams as well if you're on a tight budget. They have the matching spec's for the edelbrock performer rpm intake and cam combo in there camshafts. They also have the same thing as you're (biggest cam with stock converter cam) I've gone with 2 summit cams, (the two i've mentioned) I haven't had a problem with either. I just went to the bigger one cause i got the performer rpm intake and i wanted the matching camshaft
this is going to be my only car and my daily transportation for getting around in high school, im going to be putting a performer rpm -----will the bigger cam work with the stock converter and be fairly reliable. i will be running power brakes soon... will it be ok with that?
__________________
70 longbed
496/th400/Ford 9"
dinnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2003, 12:58 AM   #11
lukecp
Formerly yellow72custom
 
lukecp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 7,531
I've also been wondering about an Crane 272 (or maybe the Powermax split-duration version). However i have 3.07 gears and drive my truck on the highway alot so i don't want to kill my bottom end, with my curise being around 2400-3000rpm, depending on speed.

I called Comp and they said an 270H would be ideal for my 9.7:1 compresson engine...seems pretty big to me though. I was thinking or more like an XE262.....maybe a SBC will take more cam than i think it will, lol.

But anythign has got to be better than the 204/214 .420/.443 cam i have now
__________________
'72 Chevy C10 Mild 350/TH350/3.07. Ochre/White. Old high school ride.
'70 GMC C2500 '62 327 4bbl/SM465/4.56-geared Dana 60. White/White. Project or parts truck.
'97 Saturn SL DD. 1.9/5-speed. 40+ highway mpg
lukecp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2003, 01:20 AM   #12
dinnut
Registered User
 
dinnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: missouri city, tx
Posts: 4,486
Quote:
Originally posted by yellow72custom
I've also been wondering about an Crane 272 (or maybe the Powermax split-duration version). However i have 3.07 gears and drive my truck on the highway alot so i don't want to kill my bottom end, with my curise being around 2400-3000rpm, depending on speed.

I called Comp and they said an 270H would be ideal for my 9.7:1 compresson engine...seems pretty big to me though. I was thinking or more like an XE262.....maybe a SBC will take more cam than i think it will, lol.

But anythign has got to be better than the 204/214 .420/.443 cam i have now

thats a pretty small cam you got in there ! i think im going to probably get a comp 270. it sounds like a pretty high performance cam. but streetable at the same time. ive decided against the edelbrock unit i think.
__________________
70 longbed
496/th400/Ford 9"
dinnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-23-2003, 01:50 AM   #13
mikep684x4
Seeker of the big and bad
 
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: wheatland,Calif,yuba
Posts: 105
I ran a comp 280h .480 lift in 350 with 1.94 heads,headers,performer rpm,750 holley,summit $103 converter,and a turbo 400. Go 11 miles to the gallon and ran low 13's on pump gas,and drove it back and forth t work for three years till i sold it to my brother to put in his 57.He raced it for 2 more years before he tore it down. As for the Summit racing cams, They are good, they're made by Comp cams for Summit. So same great cam for a lower price.
__________________
71 3/4 ton 4x4,665hp 454.
67 GMC 1 ton towtruck
68 chevy LB 4x4
64 chevy LB custom
57 Bel-air 2d station wagon
mikep684x4 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2003, 02:45 AM   #14
fast14
Registered User
 
fast14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 117
Are you guys running screw in studs with cams like the 270-h comp?? Or will I not have to worry about the studs going anywhere with this cam?? Oh yeah, i also plan on using either 1.5 or 1.6 roller rockers, I have a set of each. Thanks.
__________________
Just a little crazy
1970 chevy full size half ton, soon to be one ton running gear, 350 turbo, 205 case, 355c.i.
fast14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2003, 05:29 AM   #15
fast14
Registered User
 
fast14's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 117
Anybody have experience with this??
__________________
Just a little crazy
1970 chevy full size half ton, soon to be one ton running gear, 350 turbo, 205 case, 355c.i.
fast14 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2003, 02:58 PM   #16
bigjimzlll
Senior Member
 
bigjimzlll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Redding,CA...USA
Posts: 4,736
Its not so much the cam..as it is the spring pressure..anything over 120lbs on the seat should have screw in studs or a stud girdle the 270 magnum ,if I remember right, is 470 lift and 270 durration...It dosent have to use big springs..but if you have some stout springs ..then you need the screw in studs
__________________
It's called "drag racing" if they called it "tic..tic..WHAM!..BANG! F*&K!!!", they'd have to keep the magazines under the counter with the other men's publications

click the clicky to join the site....
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/payments.php


67 lwb..first hotrod in 25 years..540 best ET is 9.45 @ 141.44
Anderson,CA
bigjimzlll is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:42 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com