Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
10-15-2021, 09:33 PM | #1 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: virginia
Posts: 100
|
New Brakes, It would be nice if they worked, 67 GMC
On my 67 GMC 2wd, original manual drums
I installed an entirely new brake system 10 bolt rear out of an 82 chev tk, New CPP front disc calipers,hoses, rotors New rear drums, shoes, wheel cylinders ,hardware, rubber hose, hard lines, 1/4" rear, 3/16" front, Bought a new large Master cylinder, booster, prop valve kit for a 67-72 truck, it came with a firewall mounting bracket off ebay. It had a fairly hard pedal and just wouldn't stop very well, the pedal would go down halfway and that was it, would just slow down and wouldn't pump up. Changed the master cylinder, no difference, The booster quit working completely so I bought this setup, https://www.summitracing.com/parts/sum-760197 Benchbled the cylinder and the pedal is a bit better, not great and the power assist is somewhat working, but it still just slows down, will not lock them up in gravel. Will push fluid out the bleeders when pedal is depressed On my last truck (61 chevy) I had to drill a new hole in the brake pedal to correct the ratio for the new power brake set up. This has the linkage on the bracket between the pedal & booster and I don't see any info on pedal ratio for the 67-72's I've had alot of these trucks in the past ( mostly built from junk)and never this much trouble or expense. Any ideas would be appreciated Thanks |
10-15-2021, 09:43 PM | #2 |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 7,728
|
Re: New Brakes, It would be nice if they worked, 67 GMC
I’d start by inspecting the rear brakes again. Making sure the pads are appropriate for the drum size (diameter and width) and that they are adjusted out as far as they will go. Check for leaks at all 4 corners as well as the center line in the rear. After replacing all the other parts, you may want to look at the combination valve as being bad.
__________________
44 Willys MB 52 M38A1 64 Corvette Coupe 68 Camaro 'vert LT1 & TH700 69 Z/28 355 12.6's @110 69 Chevy Short Step 4 1/2"/7" drop 72 Jimmy 4WD 4spd 4" & 35's 02 GMC 2500HD 4x4 Duramax |
10-16-2021, 07:54 AM | #3 |
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Hewitt, Tx
Posts: 386
|
Re: New Brakes, It would be nice if they worked, 67 GMC
Ok this may sound really stupid but it happened to me with my CPP kit on my 70. I am an aircraft mechanic and have pretty good mechanical ability and I still screwed this up. Check to make sure your calipers are installed on the correct side. The bleeder nipple needs to be pointing up. I had them backwards and they were pointing down. I fought this for a couple of weeks beating my head against the wall before I realized what I did. Swapped sides and the brakes were perfect. Hope this helps.
|
10-16-2021, 09:49 AM | #4 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2020
Location: Frankfort, Ill
Posts: 143
|
Re: New Brakes, It would be nice if they worked, 67 GMC
Just throwing 2 things out there:
1) Did you set the pin depth on the new master cylinder? The rod (pin) that comes out of the brake booster and goes into the MC has to be set with the proper gap. Too much gap and you will not get the full travel of the piston. Too little and your brakes can drag and eventually lock up. Youtube has a few good videos. 2) Does the proportioning valve need to be reset? This actually happened to me. If you start with a completely new empty system, the valve in the prop valve can shift off center (forward or backward) and completely block off half, front or rear, of the brake system. This is a safety feature so that if you get a leak, it shuts down that half of the system and you can still make an emergency stop. There is a little tool that you temporarly screw in the prop valve in place of the brake switch that holds the valve centered while bleeding the brakes. You can test the switch continuity with a meter by touching the little post in the switch with one lead and grounding the other lead. You should NOT have continuity if the valve is properly centered. If it shows continuity then you need to recenter the valve. This is the switch that triggers the brake light on your dash. I used an ice pick type tool in the hole where the switch goes to pry the valve back to center. You can then bleed the brakes but this can happen again unless you use the tool to keep it centered.
__________________
It's not rust, it's called patina Trying to bring a 68 Panel Truck back from the dead. 396 Big Block, 4 on the floor, and a whole lot of rust. |
10-16-2021, 09:53 AM | #5 |
Post Whore
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,393
|
Re: New Brakes, It would be nice if they worked, 67 GMC
Here are some links that may help.
http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=801705 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=470102 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=644119
__________________
Thanks to Bob and Jeanie and everyone else at Superior Performance for all their great help. RIP Bob Parks. 1967 Burban (the WMB),1988 S10 Blazer (the Stink10 II),1969 GTO (the Goat), 1970 Javelin, 1952 F2 Ford OHC six 4X4, 29 Model A, 72 Firebird (the DBP Bird). 85 Alfa Romeo If it breaks I didn't want it in the first place The WMB repair thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=698377 |
10-16-2021, 09:07 PM | #6 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: virginia
Posts: 100
|
Re: New Brakes, It would be nice if they worked, 67 GMC
Today I opened all the bleeders for about 45 minutes keeping the master cylinder full, went through over a quart of brake fluid.
I then found a fellow to push the pedal for me and bled them, no air (usually I'm by myself and use a jar and a hose to bleed each cylinder) Checked the prop valve with a test light, it's ok It has a full pedal, doesn't pump up It stops ok, not great, I think it should lock the tires up in a panic stop. I had a mid 80's Chevy that was similar in the braking dept. never liked it When the seat comes back from upholstery I'll be able to put some more miles on it, If I don't see any improvement, may put the rear drums on a brake lathe for a minor fast cut which should help the rear shoes seat better Thanks for the help, Bud |
10-16-2021, 11:26 PM | #7 |
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Bowser
Posts: 13,736
|
Re: New Brakes, It would be nice if they worked, 67 GMC
Stock 67pedal ratio is 6 to 1.
You need 4.5 to 1 for power. Usually a new hole about 1 inch lower gets it done. How much vacuum does your motor produce at idle. |
10-23-2021, 07:27 PM | #8 |
Registered User
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: virginia
Posts: 100
|
Re: New Brakes, It would be nice if they worked, 67 GMC. Solved
Today I pulled the brake pedal and drilled another hole 1-1/8" lower.
That did it, now the tires lock up. I assumed the linkage on the back of the booster would compensate or correct the difference in ratio needed, but apparently it didn't in my case. Thanks for the help, Bud |
10-23-2021, 07:32 PM | #9 |
Post Whore
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,393
|
Re: New Brakes, It would be nice if they worked, 67 GMC
Excellent!
__________________
Thanks to Bob and Jeanie and everyone else at Superior Performance for all their great help. RIP Bob Parks. 1967 Burban (the WMB),1988 S10 Blazer (the Stink10 II),1969 GTO (the Goat), 1970 Javelin, 1952 F2 Ford OHC six 4X4, 29 Model A, 72 Firebird (the DBP Bird). 85 Alfa Romeo If it breaks I didn't want it in the first place The WMB repair thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=698377 |
10-24-2021, 12:31 AM | #10 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Southern California
Posts: 2,897
|
Re: New Brakes, It would be nice if they worked, 67 GMC
Awesome it worked out! Thanks to Geezer#99 for the suggestion.
__________________
Richard 1972 K10 Custom Deluxe SWB Fleetside My build https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=800746 |
10-24-2021, 01:58 AM | #11 | |
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Elkhart, Texas
Posts: 1,853
|
Re: New Brakes, It would be nice if they worked, 67 GMC. Solved
Quote:
|
|
10-24-2021, 07:31 AM | #12 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: ripley ny
Posts: 2,972
|
Re: New Brakes, It would be nice if they worked, 67 GMC
nice thread, im having same issue as my truck has been apart for 10 yrs, (69 gmc k2500) all new except that proportion valve, drums all around. seems like i need to adjust the rod travel. i assume i need a "drum drum" master cyl?
|
10-27-2021, 11:06 PM | #13 |
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: North Texas
Posts: 3,599
|
Re: New Brakes, It would be nice if they worked, 67 GMC
Glad it worked out for you. I have found aftermarket kits to be hit or miss. Boosters can be too small, M/C bore the wrong size, and a generic one-size-fits-all proportioning valve that assumes your truck has the same weight distribution as a Nova.
My 69 C10 has a factory stock M/C, booster, and prop valve from a 71-72 truck, along with spindles, disc brakes, and steering linkage from a mid-80s truck. (Center link and tie rod ends are larger diameter than stock 67-69 C10.) It has been working very well since 1995. In fact it almost works too well, and I may some day drill a lower hole on the pedal to make it a little less touchy.
__________________
Mike 1969 C10 LWB -- owned for 35 years. 350/TH350, 3.08 posi, 1st Gen Vintage Air, recent AAW wiring harness, 5-lug conversion, 1985 spindles and brakes. 1982 C10 SWB -- sold 1981 C10 Silverado LWB -- sold, but wish I still had it! 1969 C10 (not the current one) that I bought in the early 1980s. Paid $1200; sold for $1500 a few years later. Just a hint at the appreciation that was coming. Retired as a factory automation products salesman. Worked part-time over the years for an engine builder and a classic car repair shop. Member here for 24 years! This is the very first car/truck Internet forum I joined. I still used a dial-up modem back then! |
Bookmarks |
|
|