The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-06-2024, 11:44 AM   #1
damnyankee36
Senior Member
 
damnyankee36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Alamogordo, NM
Posts: 724
Oil Filter Adapter

When disassembling the reman block in the 68, it had this kind of filter adapter. I assumed it was original to the truck and transferred to the new block. It has a GM casting number on it. Did the 68's have the canister style or spin-on filter? Was this an adapter to convert to the spin-on style?

Why couldn't have the more modern adapter worked? Is it because it had a canister filter? I really don't understand how the canister type works compared to the spin-on type. I thought to convert to a spin-on, the later style adapter was all that was needed.

Can anyone educate me on it?
Attached Images
 
__________________
1966 C10 Custom Cab Restomod (Sold)
1969 Camaro Z/28 (Keeper)

Current Build: 1968 C10 (Semi-Factory Restoration)
1983 Camaro Z/28 (Next in line, Keeper)
1951 3100 (2nd in line)

Last edited by damnyankee36; 07-06-2024 at 12:06 PM.
damnyankee36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2024, 11:54 AM   #2
Steeveedee
Who Changed This?
 
Steeveedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 10,708
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

'68 was the last(?) year for the canister type filter. Fram made an adapter that used a Ford oil filter. This was because the gasket is on a smaller diameter than the spin on Chevy filter. If the engine you're going with doesn't have a provision for the canister type filter (it would just be flat, no groove) you can use the regular Chevy filter.
__________________
~Steven

'70 Chevy 3/4T Longhorn CST 402/400/3.56 Custom Camper

Simi Valley, CA
Steeveedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2024, 12:04 AM   #3
'68OrangeSunshine
Senior Member
 
'68OrangeSunshine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Tucson, AZ USA
Posts: 7,509
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

1968 must have been a transition year. My '68 C/10 Stepside out of Fremont had a factory RPO L25 -- 292 L6 with a spin-on PF-35. I now use Wix 51061.
__________________


Every 25 years I like to rebuild that 292, whether it needs it or not.
'68OrangeSunshine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2024, 12:20 AM   #4
Steeveedee
Who Changed This?
 
Steeveedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 10,708
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

Pretty sure that the 4- and 6- cylinder engines had the spin-on filters since Chevy went away from the 235 engine in '63.
__________________
~Steven

'70 Chevy 3/4T Longhorn CST 402/400/3.56 Custom Camper

Simi Valley, CA
Steeveedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2024, 09:42 AM   #5
MARKDTN
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 2,165
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

Been a long time but I had a 327 that was pulled from a '68 Impala in the mid '80s. I just added the spin-on adapter I thought?
__________________
'83 K20-TPI
'73 C10
'79 C10-ex-diesel(SOLD)
'07 Tahoe(Son driving)
'14 Suburban-DD
'71 C10-current project
MARKDTN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2024, 10:16 AM   #6
1967GMCC20
Registered User
 
1967GMCC20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Medina, Ohio
Posts: 227
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

That's actually a good adapter, uses factory bypass valve. Many 283s, 327s used them by POs.

Canister gets you a larger filter, and if headers are close, protection from heat. Need oring for internal piece with bypass, and canister. These canisters are dirt cheap at swap meets every where..

Last edited by 1967GMCC20; 07-08-2024 at 10:22 AM.
1967GMCC20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2024, 11:21 AM   #7
Steeveedee
Who Changed This?
 
Steeveedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 10,708
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

They are also more efficient, and as much fun to clean as an oil bath filter. If it were my guess, Chevrolet did away with that design because of the nuisance of changing that o-ring every time. If you don't change the o-ring, things can go very wrong. I learned that at the age of 15 when I changed the oil in my eldest sister's '57 Plymouth, and left the old ring in because I thought it would be OK. I know that I didn't like that style, and I've done hundreds of oil changes since then.
__________________
~Steven

'70 Chevy 3/4T Longhorn CST 402/400/3.56 Custom Camper

Simi Valley, CA
Steeveedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2024, 11:35 AM   #8
1967GMCC20
Registered User
 
1967GMCC20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Medina, Ohio
Posts: 227
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

I'd bet they replaced them for same reason manufacturers make changes.

Significant Cost Savings... Somebody's grandfather got promoted.

Less parts.
Cheaper.
Lighter.
Ease of assembly.
Faster Tac-Time.
1967GMCC20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2024, 02:19 PM   #9
Steeveedee
Who Changed This?
 
Steeveedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 10,708
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

^ Yup, I'll bet just putting the newer style filter on saved a ton of time. GM keeps track of component costs to the 1/10 of a cent, at least they did in the '60s. Don't groove the block for the o-ring? Time savings. Same goes for all those filter parts and installation time. Do it a million times a year?
__________________
~Steven

'70 Chevy 3/4T Longhorn CST 402/400/3.56 Custom Camper

Simi Valley, CA
Steeveedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2024, 06:58 PM   #10
1967GMCC20
Registered User
 
1967GMCC20's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Medina, Ohio
Posts: 227
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

Right on, having worked for a large Diesel Eng Manufacturer, to be competitive, you have to keep cutting costs soon as your in production after final design approval.

In small engines look at history of MTD.. the masters of small engine products cost reduction.
1967GMCC20 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2024, 12:32 AM   #11
doowopper
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: socal
Posts: 62
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

My '69 C20 with a 350 that I bought new has a canister.
doowopper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2024, 10:58 PM   #12
FirstOwner69
Senior Member
 
FirstOwner69's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Wisconsin & Arizona
Posts: 4,852
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

Quote:
Originally Posted by doowopper View Post
My '69 C20 with a 350 that I bought new has a canister.
Same with my '69 C20 which I also bought new. I always wondered if the reason was that the truck is a 3/4 ton.
__________________
Jim
FirstOwner69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-11-2024, 08:42 PM   #13
dmjlambert
Senior Member
 
dmjlambert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 3,873
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

My 69 CST/10 with 350 came with a canister filter. My engine rebuilder converted it to spin on when he rebuilt the engine for me.
dmjlambert is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2024, 04:55 PM   #14
67C10Step
Registered User
 
67C10Step's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: Beebe, AR
Posts: 2,475
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

My 67 with its original 283 has this same adapter. It was leaking a bit when I got the truck running so I got a new one because I could not find seals listed for the one on the engine.

I've had at least three modern Toyotas with canister filters. Highlander, Tacoma, and 4Runner.
__________________
1967 C10
1980 Jeep CJ5
2020 Toyota 4Runner
2024 Toyota Tundra
67C10Step is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-12-2024, 05:37 PM   #15
damnyankee36
Senior Member
 
damnyankee36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Alamogordo, NM
Posts: 724
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

I'm going to guess the canister blocks were machined differently than the spin on? The block adapter was installed on a modern block and it appeared work OK.

They didn't have to use the adapter as far as I can see.
__________________
1966 C10 Custom Cab Restomod (Sold)
1969 Camaro Z/28 (Keeper)

Current Build: 1968 C10 (Semi-Factory Restoration)
1983 Camaro Z/28 (Next in line, Keeper)
1951 3100 (2nd in line)
damnyankee36 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2024, 01:26 PM   #16
67 twins
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2019
Location: Herculaneum MO (20 minutes south of St. Louis
Posts: 649
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67C10Step View Post
My 67 with its original 283 has this same adapter. It was leaking a bit when I got the truck running so I got a new one because I could not find seals listed for the one on the engine.

I've had at least three modern Toyotas with canister filters. Highlander, Tacoma, and 4Runner.
I found for that adapter you use the same square cut oring that is used on the canister filter to seal it to the block.
__________________
67 C10 283 T5 swapped longbed fleetside = wife's daily driver
67 C20 292 (originally a 250)4speed longbed fleetside w/original wooden bed=my project truck
67 C10 283+.060 (so a 292 as well)T5 swapped longbed fleetside=my DD
72 C1500 Sierra Grande 350 TH350 longbed fleetside=wife's fair weather truck
Can you tell we are fans of longbed fleetsides & 67s
Chris
67 twins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-13-2024, 02:36 PM   #17
Steeveedee
Who Changed This?
 
Steeveedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 10,708
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

Quote:
Originally Posted by 67 twins View Post
I found for that adapter you use the same square cut oring that is used on the canister filter to seal it to the block.
You are correct. I deleted my response, was above.
__________________
~Steven

'70 Chevy 3/4T Longhorn CST 402/400/3.56 Custom Camper

Simi Valley, CA
Steeveedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-14-2024, 07:11 AM   #18
Mickeymotormount
Active Member
 
Mickeymotormount's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Quakertown, Pa.
Posts: 118
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

Quote:
Originally Posted by damnyankee36 View Post
I'm going to guess the canister blocks were machined differently than the spin on? The block adapter was installed on a modern block and it appeared work OK.
You are correct. Blocks were machined differently for spin on and canister filters.
Personally, I prefer the canister. More filtering area even though they are a pain in the a** to change. Below are a couple pics of the differences.

Bigger pic is canister block. Smaller pic is spin on filter block.
Attached Images
  
__________________
John

1967 C20 2WD Longbed

2001 2500 HD 4X4 Extended cab long bed
Mickeymotormount is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-15-2024, 03:26 PM   #19
Stanco
Registered User
 
Stanco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2023
Location: Rural California
Posts: 32
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

There are two styles of aftermarket spin on oil filter adapters for 1956-67 Chevrolet V8 engines originally fitted with canister filters. The first style that you have is used in conjunction with the stock canister style bypass valve and uses a Chevrolet type spin on filter. This design relies on a felt washer to seal the adapter to the bypass valve. If the felt washer fails unfiltered oil will bypass the filter. Even worse pieces of the felt washer can come off and travel directly to the engine bearings. I never use this style of adapter.




The second design is the one I prefer. It uses a Ford style spin on filter. These filters have a built in bypass valve so there is no need to use the old canister bypass valve. To install this adapter you simply remove the old bypass valve, bolt the adapter directly to the block, and spin on a new filter. There is no felt washer to worry about and it uses a Ford-Chrysler style spin on oil filter which has the bypass valve built into the filter. This adapter is simple, safe, and uses the most common filter on the market.

Trans-Dapt 1024 adapter


Last edited by Stanco; 07-15-2024 at 03:32 PM.
Stanco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2024, 09:50 PM   #20
CAMAROBOY68SS
Senior Member

 
CAMAROBOY68SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 496
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Steeveedee View Post
'68 was the last(?) year for the canister type filter. Fram made an adapter that used a Ford oil filter. This was because the gasket is on a smaller diameter than the spin on Chevy filter. If the engine you're going with doesn't have a provision for the canister type filter (it would just be flat, no groove) you can use the regular Chevy filter.
68 was first year for spin on filters in passenger cars. They had a factory adaptor in them when they made the switch. Every 68 motor I have had that came out of a car was that way. I have 3 68 327s currently. The one in my truck (out of a Camaro) from the Flint plant, the numbers matching motor in my 68 Camaro from Tonawanda, and then a bare 327 block on a cart (out of a big car) cant remember the plant its from, all are spin on.

68 Small blocks are a oddball in themselves as they were a transition year. mid 59-67 are all pretty much the same then 69 and later are all pretty much the same.
__________________
The Twins:
1968 C10 SWB - Blue 327/5 Speed
1968 Camaro SS/RS - Blue 327/4speed

C10 Build Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=833278

The "Others"
1933 Ford Pickup (Camaro in disguise)
2017 Camaro SS

Life long Chevy guy
CAMAROBOY68SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2024, 09:55 PM   #21
Steeveedee
Who Changed This?
 
Steeveedee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Simi Valley, CA
Posts: 10,708
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

Thus my (?). I worked as a mechanic in those days, but don't recall all those details. I see people claiming '69 was the first year for spin on filters, too. A lot of time has elapsed since then, and memories fade.
__________________
~Steven

'70 Chevy 3/4T Longhorn CST 402/400/3.56 Custom Camper

Simi Valley, CA
Steeveedee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2024, 11:10 PM   #22
CAMAROBOY68SS
Senior Member

 
CAMAROBOY68SS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2022
Location: Hillsboro, Oregon
Posts: 496
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

I can see people thinking that with 69s as there was alot more visual change to a small block over a 68, but I have mainly messed with 68 327's for the last 15+ years now and yeah there could be a whole thread on how 68 engines are oddballs.

If you want another form of confirmation, if you look up older parts books for like Fram/Wix (Wix's online search still shows it right now as well) but if you look up a 68 327 it calls for a spin on, then look at a 67 327 and its a cartridge type.
__________________
The Twins:
1968 C10 SWB - Blue 327/5 Speed
1968 Camaro SS/RS - Blue 327/4speed

C10 Build Thread: http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=833278

The "Others"
1933 Ford Pickup (Camaro in disguise)
2017 Camaro SS

Life long Chevy guy
CAMAROBOY68SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2024, 06:13 AM   #23
Mickeymotormount
Active Member
 
Mickeymotormount's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Quakertown, Pa.
Posts: 118
Re: Oil Filter Adapter

As far as I know, 1968 and later blocks were machined for the spin on filter. This was one of the few changes to the architecture of the small block including bigger main bearing bores.

If you have a later engine with a canister, it has the special adapter to use a canister on a spin on block. These were available as an option on police, taxis, heavy duty trucks and certain marine applications. The GM part number is 3959104 for this special adapter.

.
__________________
John

1967 C20 2WD Longbed

2001 2500 HD 4X4 Extended cab long bed
Mickeymotormount is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com