The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-23-2025, 05:21 PM   #1
Orefactory4x4 swb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Springfield oregon
Posts: 385
Cam vs stall conveter

Hello
I was almost ready to get my truck on the road and ran into this.
I bought a 350 bored 30 with a comp 12-212-2 cam and bolted it to a th350 with stock converter I had rebuilt not knowing with that cam I’d need a 2500 stall converter.

It’s in a 72 k10 with 33s
Should I pull motor and replace torque converter or keep tranny the was it is and change out the cam,?

It’s going to be just a drive around town truck. Any advise much appreciate
Orefactory4x4 swb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2025, 08:24 PM   #2
RustyPile
Registered User
 
RustyPile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Elkhart, Texas
Posts: 2,108
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Cam profile and torque converters are only a small part of the "package". Comp Cams Magnum series camshafts require much higher than stock compression ratios and higher stall speed torque converters than stock. Also lower rear gear ratios play an important role. That particular cam doesn't start making power until the 2,000 RPM range..

None of this is conducive to driving around town in a truck..
RustyPile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2025, 08:53 PM   #3
Orefactory4x4 swb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Springfield oregon
Posts: 385
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Quote:
Originally Posted by RustyPile View Post
Cam profile and torque converters are only a small part of the "package". Comp Cams Magnum series camshafts require much higher than stock compression ratios and higher stall speed torque converters than stock. Also lower rear gear ratios play an important role. That particular cam doesn't start making power until the 2,000 RPM range..

None of this is conducive to driving around town in a truck..
I don’t know much on the motor then it was a high torque 350 with that cam,
I would like to take the cam way down if possible?
Something more mild. I hate the thought of another motor or pulling to install a 2500 converter.
I can swap out the converter and friend willing to do cam if possible
If I was able to do a different cam, what would be a better fit

Last edited by Orefactory4x4 swb; 05-23-2025 at 09:24 PM.
Orefactory4x4 swb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2025, 05:07 AM   #4
RustyPile
Registered User
 
RustyPile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Elkhart, Texas
Posts: 2,108
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orefactory4x4 swb View Post
>>>>>>>snip>>>>>>>>
If I was able to do a different cam, what would be a better fit
Selecting the proper cam isn't quite that simple.. There are specific details about your truck that I don't know about.. I suggest you contact one of the major cam manufacturers, Lunati, Comp Cams, Isky, etc. They will ask you lots of questions and then make a proper suggestion for a suitable cam...
RustyPile is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2025, 07:05 AM   #5
HO455
Registered User
 
HO455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 12,412
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Have you successfully broken the cam? If so with all the cam failures one hears about these days I would go with the convertor. Lot less work to swap convertors than a camshaft, even if it goes well.

That being said there's no reason you can't run it the way it is. Then if you're not happy with it change the converter next winter.

You didn't mention what gears you have in the truck. 4.11's would work better than 3.73's or higher gears with your stated combo.
__________________
Thanks to Bob and Jeanie and everyone else at Superior Performance for all their great help.
RIP Bob Parks.
1967 Burban (the WMB),1988 S10 Blazer (the Stink10 II),1969 GTO (the Goat), 1970 Javelin, 1952 F2 Ford OHC six 4X4, 29 Model A, 72 Firebird (the DBP Bird). 85 Alfa Romeo
If it breaks I didn't want it in the first place
The WMB repair thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=698377
HO455 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2025, 12:26 PM   #6
Orefactory4x4 swb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Springfield oregon
Posts: 385
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Quote:
Originally Posted by HO455 View Post
Have you successfully broken the cam? If so with all the cam failures one hears about these days I would go with the convertor. Lot less work to swap convertors than a camshaft, even if it goes well.

That being said there's no reason you can't run it the way it is. Then if you're not happy with it change the converter next winter.

You didn't mention what gears you have in the truck. 4.11's would work better than 3.73's or higher gears with your stated combo.
Not sure on the gears.. it just states posi on the tag.
My brother in law was telling me away of checking by counting driveline rotations?
He was saying that to about get in tuned and drive.
I want the brakes to work with proper vacuum and not have to hold it back at stop lights and need it kick into neutral to keep running.
I’m going to play with it some more and see what happens
I’m going to get a piston stop and find true dead center and look for any possible vac leaks some more
Orefactory4x4 swb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2025, 01:51 PM   #7
HO455
Registered User
 
HO455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 12,412
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Here is a thread about the cam.

https://www.camaros.net/threads/your...80h-cam.15353/

Here's some information on the axle codes stamped on the tube. If no one has re-geared it it should help you ID the ratio.

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=578793
__________________
Thanks to Bob and Jeanie and everyone else at Superior Performance for all their great help.
RIP Bob Parks.
1967 Burban (the WMB),1988 S10 Blazer (the Stink10 II),1969 GTO (the Goat), 1970 Javelin, 1952 F2 Ford OHC six 4X4, 29 Model A, 72 Firebird (the DBP Bird). 85 Alfa Romeo
If it breaks I didn't want it in the first place
The WMB repair thread http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=698377
HO455 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2025, 02:52 PM   #8
Orefactory4x4 swb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Springfield oregon
Posts: 385
Thumbs up Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Quote:
Originally Posted by HO455 View Post
Here is a thread about the cam.

https://www.camaros.net/threads/your...80h-cam.15353/

Here's some information on the axle codes stamped on the tube. If no one has re-geared it it should help you ID the ratio.

http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=578793
Thank you for your help
Orefactory4x4 swb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2025, 08:49 PM   #9
Orefactory4x4 swb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Springfield oregon
Posts: 385
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Good news.
I think I figured it out, kinda.
Unhooked brake boost at carb. Runs good now.
Now got to figure that out.
Orefactory4x4 swb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2025, 05:15 PM   #10
70STOVEBOLT
Senior Member
 
70STOVEBOLT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Winona Lake, IN
Posts: 7,066
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Brake booster vacuum hose should be connected to the intake manifold behind the carb
__________________
70 C/10 SWB 402/TH400/3.73 "The Needy Beast"
200,000 Mile Club
Disc Brake Club

Owner installed options:
Front Sway Bar
Power Steering
Power Brakes
Cigar Lighter
Courtesy Lights
Deluxe Side Markers
Wiper Delay
Sliding Rear Window
Power Windows
Power Locks
Sniper EFI

2015 Silverado 1500 LS 4.3/6L80/3.23 lowered 2" front & rear
70STOVEBOLT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2025, 05:50 PM   #11
57taskforce
All about them K’s
 
57taskforce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Land of Entrapment
Posts: 6,979
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

A stall converter is definitely not ideal behind a 3/4 ton 4x4 truck. With out extra cooling you will likely be smoking that transmission pretty quick. I would change the cam and convert it over to a roller in the process.
__________________
Tyler
'57 3100 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=813888
'72 K20 Cheyenne: 5” lift, 35’s, front dana 60 blah blah blah… http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=662879
‘69 K10 SWB: 4” lift 33”s… in a million pieces http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=805206
'98 Silverado LT K2500HD ECLB Vortec 454/4l80E: 6" lift 35x12.5x20’s
57taskforce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2025, 07:27 PM   #12
Orefactory4x4 swb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Springfield oregon
Posts: 385
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Quote:
Originally Posted by 57taskforce View Post
A stall converter is definitely not ideal behind a 3/4 ton 4x4 truck. With out extra cooling you will likely be smoking that transmission pretty quick. I would change the cam and convert it over to a roller in the process.
It’s a k10 motor bored in rebuild. What cam would you recommend?
Some say 12-211-2 or a 4x4 cam
Orefactory4x4 swb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-25-2025, 07:31 PM   #13
Orefactory4x4 swb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Springfield oregon
Posts: 385
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Quote:
Originally Posted by 70STOVEBOLT View Post
Brake booster vacuum hose should be connected to the intake manifold behind the carb
Plug back hole. Connect to manifold. Where would vac gauge transmission and distributed all connect to the two ports up front on the 1906 carb?
Orefactory4x4 swb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2025, 04:15 PM   #14
Orefactory4x4 swb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Springfield oregon
Posts: 385
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Any thoughts on a comp Xtreme cl 12-262-4
Or summit 1103

Last edited by Orefactory4x4 swb; 05-26-2025 at 06:15 PM. Reason: Added
Orefactory4x4 swb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2025, 10:38 PM   #15
Orefactory4x4 swb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Springfield oregon
Posts: 385
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Well the forum seems a little useless for help.
So I guess I’ll take my chances with AI
And order the summit 1102 and see what happens
Orefactory4x4 swb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2025, 11:00 PM   #16
57taskforce
All about them K’s
 
57taskforce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Land of Entrapment
Posts: 6,979
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Well it is a long holiday weekend. Some of us at least haven’t been around much, myself included. You could always pick up the phone and call comp. Which truthfully I wouldn’t touch one of their flat tappet cams with a 10 foot pole. I know of several issues from the last few years with their cams going flat even with proper zinc and break in. As I said above I would look into a roller cam retrofit, to expound on that further is difficult without knowing what your compression ratio is, piston type, (flat top vs valve relief) actual bore size, valve size, head and intake combo, and any mods to the heads like porting or cutting the guides for extra lift, etc. it’s not as easy as let’s slap a cam in and see what happens to get it right, which is partially why I’d guess you haven’t gotten much feedback. The cam is only a piece of the puzzle. I used to build engines professionally for what it’s worth. One of the 4x4 type cams is what I would want if it was mine but the exact one depends on what’s in your block.
__________________
Tyler
'57 3100 http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=813888
'72 K20 Cheyenne: 5” lift, 35’s, front dana 60 blah blah blah… http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=662879
‘69 K10 SWB: 4” lift 33”s… in a million pieces http://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/s...d.php?t=805206
'98 Silverado LT K2500HD ECLB Vortec 454/4l80E: 6" lift 35x12.5x20’s
57taskforce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2025, 11:44 PM   #17
Orefactory4x4 swb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Springfield oregon
Posts: 385
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Quote:
Originally Posted by 57taskforce View Post
Well it is a long holiday weekend. Some of us at least haven’t been around much, myself included. You could always pick up the phone and call comp. Which truthfully I wouldn’t touch one of their flat tappet cams with a 10 foot pole. I know of several issues from the last few years with their cams going flat even with proper zinc and break in. As I said above I would look into a roller cam retrofit, to expound on that further is difficult without knowing what your compression ratio is, piston type, (flat top vs valve relief) actual bore size, valve size, head and intake combo, and any mods to the heads like porting or cutting the guides for extra lift, etc. it’s not as easy as let’s slap a cam in and see what happens to get it right, which is partially why I’d guess you haven’t gotten much feedback. The cam is only a piece of the puzzle. I used to build engines professionally for what it’s worth. One of the 4x4 type cams is what I would want if it was mine but the exact one depends on what’s in your block.
I know it not the right process, but that’s what I’m up against.
All I know is the 12-212-2 is way to much. Runs great but not for a truck. I don’t have a clue about compression valve size and so on.
I’m looking for a try this it’s bound to be better answer.
I’ve read this form and others all weekend.
At this point I need hillbilly feedback,not professional.
If you get where I’m coming from
Orefactory4x4 swb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2025, 11:56 PM   #18
MS66
Senior Member
 
MS66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Florence, MS.
Posts: 246
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

I've had all three of these camshafts in different engines/vehicles at one time or another, none were 4x4 trucks with 33s.
The 212 Magnum is a street/strip cam that has zero business in a truck unless you were mud bogging it. It needs 10-1 cr to even think about pulling, works better with 11-1cr. Not good for a street truck. Cam needs to come out, no question about it. Even with a converter it would suck.
The 1103 cam is a great street machine cam with a decent bumpety sound and great torque compromise in the lower ranges, pulls much stronger than stock after around 2500-2800. It is a very streetable cam that can be used with stock converter with no problems. But, it really likes to be in a lighter weight vehicle than a 4x4 truck, I'd pass on that cam.
The 1102 is a sweetheart of an RV type cam with super low end torque that pulls strong to 5000. Works great with stock cast iron intake, Quadrajet carb, and original exhaust manifolds. Headers do wake it up quite a bit. This grind is what Edelbrock marketed as the Performer cam back in the '80s. I've used it in over a dozen different sbc builds, including trucks and 4x4s. It has a great sounding idle and drivability is uncompromised. Perfect truck cam.
If you want to go with a Comp Cams product the 268 High Energy cam is hard to beat and would work in your truck. It has a lumpy idle with great low end.
The Extreme Energy version that you mentioned is a step up from the 268 HE. I wouldn't use it in a truck. Just like the 1103 cam, I'd leave that for a lighter weight vehicle where it belongs. Just my experience.
The 1102 is the best choice IMHO.
HTH.
MS66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2025, 12:07 AM   #19
Orefactory4x4 swb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Springfield oregon
Posts: 385
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Quote:
Originally Posted by MS66 View Post
I've had all three of these camshafts in different engines/vehicles at one time or another, none were 4x4 trucks with 33s.
The 212 Magnum is a street/strip cam that has zero business in a truck unless you were mud bogging it. It needs 10-1 cr to even think about pulling, works better with 11-1cr. Not good for a street truck. Cam needs to come out, no question about it. Even with a converter it would suck.
The 1103 cam is a great street machine cam with a decent bumpety sound and great torque compromise in the lower ranges, pulls much stronger than stock after around 2500-2800. It is a very streetable cam that can be used with stock converter with no problems. But, it really likes to be in a lighter weight vehicle than a 4x4 truck, I'd pass on that cam.
The 1102 is a sweetheart of an RV type cam with super low end torque that pulls strong to 5000. Works great with stock cast iron intake, Quadrajet carb, and original exhaust manifolds. Headers do wake it up quite a bit. This grind is what Edelbrock marketed as the Performer cam back in the '80s. I've used it in over a dozen different sbc builds, including trucks and 4x4s. It has a great sounding idle and drivability is uncompromised. Perfect truck cam.
If you want to go with a Comp Cams product the 268 High Energy cam is hard to beat and would work in your truck. It has a lumpy idle with great low end.
The Extreme Energy version that you mentioned is a step up from the 268 HE. I wouldn't use it in a truck. Just like the 1103 cam, I'd leave that for a lighter weight vehicle where it belongs. Just my experience.
The 1102 is the best choice IMHO.
HTH.
Thanks much, appreciated a bunch
Orefactory4x4 swb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2025, 08:37 AM   #20
Accelo
Registered User
 
Accelo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: washington
Posts: 2,426
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Your camshaft has an intake Duration at 050-inch Lift is 230 deg.
I have a 212-duration cam and I consider it a max cam for a 4000-pound truck with 3.70 gears and a stock converter. I plan on changing the converter for better off the line performance.
The real reason for the high stall converter is it allows the motor to get into a higher rpm to produce more torque at lower speeds. Especially if you have a heavy truck.
Accelo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-27-2025, 10:15 AM   #21
Orefactory4x4 swb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Springfield oregon
Posts: 385
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Accelo View Post
Your camshaft has an intake Duration at 050-inch Lift is 230 deg.
I have a 212-duration cam and I consider it a max cam for a 4000-pound truck with 3.70 gears and a stock converter. I plan on changing the converter for better off the line performance.
The real reason for the high stall converter is it allows the motor to get into a higher rpm to produce more torque at lower speeds. Especially if you have a heavy truck.
I was going to go that route and got feedback that they produce a lot of heat and would smoke tranny in time.
That’s why I’ve been leaning on changing the cam to make it more street friendly and not so much a race car feel you got to hold back.
Appreciate your feedback
Orefactory4x4 swb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2025, 06:06 PM   #22
Orefactory4x4 swb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Springfield oregon
Posts: 385
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Ended up switching that out with the 1102.
Purrs like a kitten and still has a good sound with the duel magnaflows
Appreciate the feedback from the members on it
for the help
Orefactory4x4 swb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2025, 06:20 PM   #23
connorm
Registered User
 
connorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Angola IN
Posts: 181
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orefactory4x4 swb View Post
Ended up switching that out with the 1102.
Purrs like a kitten and still has a good sound with the duel magnaflows
Appreciate the feedback from the members on it
for the help
Any update on drivability? Did you ever figure out what gears and tire sizes you are running?
__________________
1970 C/2500 Ol' Green https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=668003
2016 GMC Sierra K1500
1953 Mercury 2 Door Sedan https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...17#post9381817
connorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2025, 06:32 PM   #24
Orefactory4x4 swb
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2023
Location: Springfield oregon
Posts: 385
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Quote:
Originally Posted by connorm View Post
Any update on drivability? Did you ever figure out what gears and tire sizes you are running?
No, but getting close. It’s 373 and went with falcon 33s
About 2 more weeks, but I’m getting excited.
I bought it from from the widow of original owner.
Drove it from he’s place to mine and with a lot of work and 4 yrs. It’s about to hit the streets of Springfield all over again

Last edited by Orefactory4x4 swb; 06-04-2025 at 06:40 PM.
Orefactory4x4 swb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-04-2025, 06:35 PM   #25
connorm
Registered User
 
connorm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Angola IN
Posts: 181
Re: Cam vs stall conveter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Orefactory4x4 swb View Post
No, but getting close. It’s 373 and went with falcon 33s
A torquey engine like that ought to go well with 3:73's and 33's. I've got 33's and 4:10's in my 70 C20 with a 307. With the stock 307 I'm not sure that it could pull 3:73's but that combo should work really well for you with the torque convertor. Let us know how it goes
__________________
1970 C/2500 Ol' Green https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...d.php?t=668003
2016 GMC Sierra K1500
1953 Mercury 2 Door Sedan https://67-72chevytrucks.com/vboard/...17#post9381817
connorm is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2025 67-72chevytrucks.com