The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > 47 - Current classic GM Trucks > The 1967 - 1972 Chevrolet & GMC Pickups Message Board

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-24-2004, 04:56 PM   #1
speesh
Senior Member
 
speesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
Posts: 318
3.08s and overdrive?

My 71 burban has the famous 3.08 rear gears. Is there any point to going with a 700r4 tranny? I would like to save on gas if possible, but not if its only .002 mpg! So would it still be worth the tranny swap or not?
__________________
57 suburban(sitting in the driveway), 2 69 C20 longbeds (sitting in the field ) and a 2003 8.1 Suburban
Endeavor to persevere.
"All of a sudden, I'm the old timer!" Some old timer on American Pickers.
speesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 05:20 PM   #2
SWEET7T
Try spinnin 4 rear tars
 
SWEET7T's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Salt Lake City, Utah
Posts: 757
it would help if you swapped to a 700R4 AND swapped your rearend to 3.73's! 3.08 is just too high a gear with overdrive, unless your cruising speed is 90+ so the converter will lock.

Hope my file attachment works... Has some interesting stuff about the different GM trannies and rearends so you can figure out what you want. I found the page on the net quite awhile back and I just saved it, I don't have a clue what the URL is for this place anymore
Attached Files
File Type: zip tranny facts.zip (9.1 KB, 159 views)
__________________
SWEET7T
1970 C10, 2wd, LB, 307/TH350/3.08. PS, PB
SWEET7T is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 05:32 PM   #3
Bowtie67
Registered User
 
Bowtie67's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: NH
Posts: 2,266
Post

Newer cars are running OD with a 2.98GR Your setup will work but going into OD your RPMS are gonna drop to about 1500RPM you wouldn't be able to tow anything, haul any real heavy loads. The nice part about the 700R4 is the nice low 1st gear which you dont have with the 350 or 400 tranmisions. 373 gears do work well with the OD, your cruise speed should be around 2000 depending on tire size. JMO

Bowtie67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 05:56 PM   #4
MrGoodpliers
Registered User
 
MrGoodpliers's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gainesville, Georgia
Posts: 704
I think most trucks now with OD's are equipped with 3:42's.
__________________
We made Oklahoma a little after 3, Randy & his brother Bob & my old GMC...
MrGoodpliers is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 05:56 PM   #5
sam's 72
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Pasadena, Texas, USA
Posts: 1,005
I had a 83 chevy truck at one time, 700r4 with 2.73 gears in it, would not pull good at all, but it got really good milage,
__________________
72 LWB chevy truck.
Pasadena, Texas
sam's 72 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 06:55 PM   #6
krue
Designated A-hole!
 
krue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: South Mississippi
Posts: 36,450
Quote:
Your setup will work but going into OD your RPMS are gonna drop to about 1500RPM you wouldn't be able to tow anything, haul any real heavy loads.
You really shouldn't tow anything heavy in OD with a 700r4 unless you are looking to replace it. Most everybody I know that has had one die on them was towing in OD. Anything heavier than an empty trailer and I just tow in drive.
__________________
"If it ain't broke, fix it 'til it is!"
Being stupid ain't illegal.

We're Still Debt Free Except for the House!!!
www.daveramsey.com

70 GMC SWB Stepside project "Green Booger" soon to be 6.0l/4l80e
93 S-10 "Poppaw's Truck"
krue is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 07:02 PM   #7
stelth2002
Young Gun wth Fast Inline
 
stelth2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,475
I wouldnt and i dont know any cars really that have overdrive and a sub 3:1 gear ratio. Most of the cars today have smaller displacment engines that are suppose to be wound up a little higher than a bigger cube like a 350. Trucks mostly have 3.73 gears unless you get to diesel ones. As for putting in an OD tranny with those gears i think you might actaully loose milage depending on your driving. If you drive in town much it will be worse. However, if all you do is flatter freeway, then you might benifit from it. With a stock motor, you will be downshifting from od on a hill though. And person opinion, i wouldnt.
__________________
1967 Chevrolet LWB with built 292! 415 ft. lbs of torque, 4 speed :O with 27% overdrive too, 3.73 Posi. Frame and body done... getting painted!!!
stelth2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 08:06 PM   #8
Longhorn Man
its all about the +6 inches
 
Longhorn Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
I agree, over drive and 3.07 gears will hurt your MPG.
Longhorn Man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 08:48 PM   #9
Blazer1970
Registered User
 
Blazer1970's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Old Mission, MI, USA
Posts: 2,510
Quote:
Originally posted by sam's 72
I had a 83 chevy truck at one time, 700r4 with 2.73 gears in it, would not pull good at all, but it got really good milage,
Yup, for a few years there they built a bunch of half ton trucks with the 700R4 and 2.73 gears. A lot of them probably had 305s also.
__________________
Tim
Blazer1970 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 08:56 PM   #10
lukecp
Formerly yellow72custom
 
lukecp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 7,531
One of my friends has an '86 K10, 305/700R4/3.08 and 32" tires. It is a DOG.....runs 18.4's in the 1/4 mile with a Gtech, lol. However it does idle down the highway.....still only gets around 10mpg, but the engine is tired.
__________________
'72 Chevy C10 Mild 350/TH350/3.07. Ochre/White. Old high school ride.
'70 GMC C2500 '62 327 4bbl/SM465/4.56-geared Dana 60. White/White. Project or parts truck.
'97 Saturn SL DD. 1.9/5-speed. 40+ highway mpg
lukecp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 08:59 PM   #11
Huck
Senior Member
 
Huck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Shelbyville, KY
Posts: 3,269
Hate to disagree with all of the above but----. The stock rear for a 350, auto truck is 308. And they run pretty decent. The difference between an overdrive and a stock turbo 350 at 65mph is about 900 rpm. If you did things to improve the engine performance like ---HEI, Headers, Dual exhaust, better Carb and intake----your engine will pull up any interstate highway hill in OD with no problem. Now if you pull trailers, you may have to downshift or run in 3rd gear verses 4th.
You can expect to see a 2-3 mpg savings with OD on the highway. Around town a 700R4 may help mpg a bit but the real bonus is on the open road saving those 8-900 rpm.
A 342 rear will allow for better pulling as you will be higher on your rpm curve.
My .02 based on personal experience.
Huck is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 09:20 PM   #12
FirstGen
Just Don't Stop!
 
FirstGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,239
My R/T has 3.92's with a 42RE tranny and a .69 overdrive. It put down 500 hp and gets about 8-12 in the city and NO LIE 20 mpg on the highway if I set it at 70mph!!
__________________
1968 C10 build in process
TT LSA/6L90e/9"
FirstGen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 09:23 PM   #13
stelth2002
Young Gun wth Fast Inline
 
stelth2002's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Idaho
Posts: 1,475
I believe that it gets that milage, its all about matching the stuff right. Have you ever dynoed your dodge?
__________________
1967 Chevrolet LWB with built 292! 415 ft. lbs of torque, 4 speed :O with 27% overdrive too, 3.73 Posi. Frame and body done... getting painted!!!
stelth2002 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-24-2004, 09:35 PM   #14
FirstGen
Just Don't Stop!
 
FirstGen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,239
512 and 486 ft-pds to the rears = 11.86 @ 126mph
__________________
1968 C10 build in process
TT LSA/6L90e/9"
FirstGen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2004, 01:44 AM   #15
86k10
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Bertrand, Nebraska
Posts: 355
Speaking from my experience, 3.08 and overdrive don't mix except if you are on level ground with a good wind behind you. The truck in my sig used to be a 305 with 3.08's and the difference in mileage wasn't much from about 17 in 4th to 16 in 3rd. not enough to matter, but at least in 3rd it would run pretty decent. I wouldn't go with anything less than 3.73 with a 700, especially with a small block chevy since they don't have any power unless they are wound up a little.
__________________
98 Neon
97 Grand Prix GT
02 Grand Prix 40th Anniv.
86 GMC 5.0
77 Olds 98 6.6


REAL AMERICANS, DRIVE AMERICAN
86k10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2004, 01:55 AM   #16
rn2fine
Registered User
 
rn2fine's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Arizona
Posts: 157
I have a Burb C10 with the following:

- 350 with a mild roller hydraulic cam
- Edelbrock E-Tec 170 Heads (Vortec style)
- Headers
- HEI
- Edelbrock 600 cfm carb #1406
- Performer Vortec Manifold
- 700R4
- And 3.07 Gears

It gets 15 mpg. The 700R4 has a steep 1st gear so the 3.08 will work well with it off the line. I have no complaints about not having enough power. RPM's are low on the freeway but my engine setup has a lot of torque. I am pleased with the 700R4 and do not regret it. I hope to put a TPI on the motor some day now that GM has a TPI base for Vortecs. I am hoping to get 17 to 18 mpg with the TPI, and gobs more power too. What kind of mileage are you getting now?
__________________
72 C10 Burb 350 700R4
70 C20 LWB 350 Crate TH400
68 Chevelle
rn2fine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2004, 04:32 PM   #17
speesh
Senior Member
 
speesh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Ridgecrest, CA
Posts: 318
last time I checked it was about 15 mpg... which seems pretty good for these old trucks! That is with a 3 speed manual, which I am wanting to change to an automatic so my wife can drive it. ( o.k., because I am too lazy to shift.... ) I also have an edelbrock carb and manifold, dual exhaust, k&n air filter, and H.E.I.... I wonder how much mileage I will lose if I go with a turbo 400? I know a 350 is more efficient and will bolt in easier, but I already have a rebuilt 400.
__________________
57 suburban(sitting in the driveway), 2 69 C20 longbeds (sitting in the field ) and a 2003 8.1 Suburban
Endeavor to persevere.
"All of a sudden, I'm the old timer!" Some old timer on American Pickers.
speesh is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2004, 04:38 PM   #18
bpmcgee
Registered User
 
bpmcgee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Northern Illinois
Posts: 2,181
Quote:
Originally posted by 86k10
<snip>especially with a small block chevy since they don't have any power unless they are wound up a little.


Brian
bpmcgee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2004, 05:29 PM   #19
Dean
Senior Member
 
Dean's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,492
My El Camino SS has a 2.41 rearend...I'm ready for the salt flats....lol
Dean is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2004, 07:58 PM   #20
sixty8c10
MY EX DRIVES A BROOM
 
sixty8c10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Herington, KS
Posts: 869
i'm going through this dilema right now and so far everyone i have spoken to about it has told me the same thing 3:42 or lower anything higher will lug the engine thus you would really not being saving any gas
__________________
They say nobody's perfect.
I'm a nobody, so I must be perfect.

Building Nemo -1968 C10 Long Bed

FRED -1947 KB-2 International
sixty8c10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2004, 09:04 PM   #21
lukecp
Formerly yellow72custom
 
lukecp's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 7,531
Quote:
Originally posted by bpmcgee




Brian
I agree here....a stock SBC is an excellent low/midrange engine. They usually peter out somewhere after 4,000 rpm in stock form.
__________________
'72 Chevy C10 Mild 350/TH350/3.07. Ochre/White. Old high school ride.
'70 GMC C2500 '62 327 4bbl/SM465/4.56-geared Dana 60. White/White. Project or parts truck.
'97 Saturn SL DD. 1.9/5-speed. 40+ highway mpg
lukecp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-25-2004, 09:25 PM   #22
nate68
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: ca
Posts: 1,110
i'm surprised no one has mentioned cam selection. stock cam 350 will prolly be fine with OD and 3.08 gears. if you're going to go with a bigger cam then definately change the gears as well. i'm running 3.50 gears with a 700r4 (406ci) and i wouldnt run any taller gears. the sb 400s have the extra torque to handle the taller gears.
i went from 10mpg to a best of 13 when i changed the tranny. my mpg is pretty sensitive to timing. town driving is what kills me though.
__________________
68 short step, 406/700r4, 9" w/discs.
nate68 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com