|
03-01-2004, 08:57 PM
|
#1 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Penelope, Texas
Posts: 393
|
Quick Question?
I have read a lot about lowering the rear 4" with late 70's early 80's Monte Carlo springs. My question is will the springs off a Cutlass or a Grand Prix work to? What is the latest year I can use?
|
|
|
|
03-01-2004, 10:30 PM
|
#2 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: north of Phx AZ about 30 miles
Posts: 698
|
Brand spankin' new springs that are made to do the job are dirt cheap. Invest in a new set, you won't regret it.
__________________
Andy,Phx AZ '67 C-10 (Ahhh, done at last. Well there is that disk front end I want to put in and...) "23 C-Cab-sold '48 Ford 8N tractor(still working) '67 Scout(Now on the road) '70 MG B.-sold |
|
|
|
|
03-02-2004, 01:38 AM
|
#3 |
|
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
Dirt cheap to one person is 1/2 of another person's pay check. Not all of us can whip out the VISA Platnum card for truck parts.
Old stock A or G body springs should work from what I've been told. The Malibu went up to 84 I think. Also an old member said something almost 2 years ago about a Limo Caddy springs looking liek they'd fit...he did a one man 4 car demo derby in his back yard. Anyone else remember that? |
|
|
|
|
03-02-2004, 11:27 AM
|
#4 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In a snowdrift in Manitoba
Posts: 39
|
longhorn man said "Dirt cheap to one person is 1/2 of another person's pay check. Not all of us can whip out the VISA Platnum card for truck parts. "
Amen to that brother..
__________________
'70 C-10, mostly rust n' dust '74 BMW R90/6 "The quickest way to get yourself out of a hole, is to stop digging..." |
|
|
|
|
03-02-2004, 03:10 PM
|
#5 |
|
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SOMERSET KY.
Posts: 6,427
|
 80s EL CAMINO SPRINGS WORK TO LOWER THE REAR OF OUR TRUCKS 3 - 4" TOO.  JOHN
__________________
junkyardjohn 69 1 TON TOW TRUCK // 84 4WD CUCV BLAZER// 85 1 TON 4WD STAKE TRUCK// 86 M1031 5/4 TON 4WD CUCV// ALOT OF OLD TRUCKS FOR ONE OLD MAN TO DRIVE.  THERES ROOM FOR ALL OF GODS CREATURES RIGHT NEXT TO MY MASHED POTATOES//LIFE MEMBER OF P.E.T.A (PEOPLE EATING TASTY ANIMALS) DON'T RENT U-HAUL ALWAYS TELL THE TRUTH IT WILL AMAZE PART OF THE PEOPLE & ASTONISH THE REST |
|
|
|
|
03-02-2004, 04:12 PM
|
#6 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: New Salem, ND
Posts: 1,558
|
would those be the stock springs or are these still lowering springs but for a monte carlo. So if i just went to my local junk yeard and got a set of Monte Carlo springs they should lower the rear 3-4 inches. But what about the front could i get the front ones and lower it or not. Thanks
|
|
|
|
|
03-02-2004, 04:14 PM
|
#7 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: From Chicago, Live in Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 6,802
|
How is the ride and hauling capacity with these springs?
__________________
Just sitting here contemplating contemplation. |
|
|
|
|
03-02-2004, 04:31 PM
|
#8 |
|
Like a Rock!
Join Date: May 2002
Location: USA
Posts: 1,092
|
should be softer since they are intended for cars, not sure though.
__________________
69 LWB Runs great - work in progress Mess with me and you mess with the whole trailer park! 
|
|
|
|
|
03-02-2004, 06:36 PM
|
#9 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: SOMERSET KY.
Posts: 6,427
|
IF YOU CUT ONE FULL COIL OF YOUR STOCK FRONT SPRINGS, IT'LL LOWER THE FRONT ABOUT 2 1/2 - 3" & STOCK EL CAMINO SPRINGS FROM THE 70s OR 80s IT'LL LOWER THE BACK ABOUT 3 1/2 - 4" MAKING IT PRETTY LEVEL. THEY ARE A LITTLE SOFTER THAN TRUCK SPRINGS. JOHN
__________________
junkyardjohn 69 1 TON TOW TRUCK // 84 4WD CUCV BLAZER// 85 1 TON 4WD STAKE TRUCK// 86 M1031 5/4 TON 4WD CUCV// ALOT OF OLD TRUCKS FOR ONE OLD MAN TO DRIVE. THERES ROOM FOR ALL OF GODS CREATURES RIGHT NEXT TO MY MASHED POTATOES//LIFE MEMBER OF P.E.T.A (PEOPLE EATING TASTY ANIMALS) DON'T RENT U-HAUL ALWAYS TELL THE TRUTH IT WILL AMAZE PART OF THE PEOPLE & ASTONISH THE REST |
|
|
|
|
03-02-2004, 06:56 PM
|
#10 |
|
its all about the +6 inches
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Hilliard Ohio
Posts: 2,693
|
The cool thing is, the El Camino is an 1/2 ton truck. So the load capacity would be about the same, save for the difference of the vehicle weight.
|
|
|
|
|
03-02-2004, 07:16 PM
|
#11 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sahuarita, AZ USA
Posts: 2,033
|
I replaced the springs in my Monte Carlo after over 200K, while doing a complete suspension rebuild. The car had been lower in the back than the front for a couple of years (at least), but now sits right with the new springs. Probably sagged 2 inches or more, just from fatigue.
__________________
Bill - Tucson, AZ 47 Chevrolet 2 dr sedan 56 Chevrolet 210 2 dr sedan 66 Chevrolet Malibu 2 dr 4 speed 71 Chevrolet C30 Longhorn 86 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS (Sold) 01 Chevrolet Tahoe IM - BUSTERWIVE@aol.com |
|
|
|
|
03-02-2004, 07:45 PM
|
#12 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Penelope, Texas
Posts: 393
|
Thank for all of the feedback. I been pricing new springs they are like $150! I am not ready to spend that kind of money right now on springs. I think I will go with the ElCamino Springs like junkyardjohn said.
My truck has new stock height springs on the back and the truck sits way to high in the back. What I am trying to do is level my truck so will three or four inches be right or to much?
|
|
|
|
|
03-02-2004, 09:38 PM
|
#13 |
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Sahuarita, AZ USA
Posts: 2,033
|
I don't think I spent anything close to that, I got mine from Performance Suspension in Phoenix. They ahve an 800 #, I'll look it up for you if you want.
__________________
Bill - Tucson, AZ 47 Chevrolet 2 dr sedan 56 Chevrolet 210 2 dr sedan 66 Chevrolet Malibu 2 dr 4 speed 71 Chevrolet C30 Longhorn 86 Chevrolet Monte Carlo SS (Sold) 01 Chevrolet Tahoe IM - BUSTERWIVE@aol.com |
|
|
|
 |
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
