|
Register or Log In To remove these advertisements. |
|
|
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
04-02-2002, 03:26 PM
|
#1 |
|
Saving 1 truck at a time!
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 6,465
|
1966 vs 1967 frame etc.
I am looking at a '66 sans engine and transmission but with front discs, dropped spindles, fuel cell, posi, the works. It looks like my '67 body will just bolt right on...what do you think...someone must know the answer.
__________________
'68 C20 Longhorn 50th Anniversary 400/TH400 '68 C20 Longhorn 50th Anniversary 468/TH400w/buckets '72 C20 Halfhorn (Longhorn w/o cab and front clip) '69 Flxible Cruiser (look up ugly in the dictionary) |
|
|
|
04-02-2002, 04:03 PM
|
#2 |
|
Account Suspended
Join Date: May 2000
Location: IL
Posts: 0
|
same, only majo difference is that the front frame horns differ form 66 to 67, bumpers wont interchange
|
|
|
|
|
04-02-2002, 07:30 PM
|
#3 |
|
Saving 1 truck at a time!
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 6,465
|
Fast, was going to consider a roll pan anyway. I guess as long as it wouldn't interfere with the '67 body that would be fine...can always fab new mounts anyway. Will the cab holes and bed holes line up? That would be great! This frame has had every possible mod and was set up to run sub 12 second et's (even has a roll cage). It has wheels tires everything for cheap. I will look at it tonight but it would be a perfect foundation for my 400sb and '67 body.
------------------ If it weren't for all the mistakes I made...this would be a part time job!
__________________
'68 C20 Longhorn 50th Anniversary 400/TH400 '68 C20 Longhorn 50th Anniversary 468/TH400w/buckets '72 C20 Halfhorn (Longhorn w/o cab and front clip) '69 Flxible Cruiser (look up ugly in the dictionary) |
|
|
|
|
| Bookmarks |
|
|
Linear Mode
