The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network







Register or Log In To remove these advertisements.

Go Back   The 1947 - Present Chevrolet & GMC Truck Message Board Network > General Truck Forums > Suspension

Web 67-72chevytrucks.com


Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-14-2022, 04:55 PM   #1
Ziegelsteinfaust
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Temple City
Posts: 3,628
Someone say Gulstrand???

https://i.imgur.com/eMWbqvZ.jpeg

https://i.imgur.com/3c9RMDm.jpeg

https://i.imgur.com/Z2k87H9.jpeg

Dick Gulstrand is a genius. Typically its 4 holes to legendary, but the stamping is a bit different here.
Ziegelsteinfaust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2022, 10:03 PM   #2
KQQL IT
At the body shop.
 
KQQL IT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Land of fruits and nuts.
Posts: 5,254
Re: Someone say Gulstrand???

We went up with the upper.
2° camber change thru the travel.
Looks like you might have some undesirable camber changes
__________________
" That didnt make it any newer "
" Dont antique the equipment "
KQQL IT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2022, 10:30 PM   #3
Ziegelsteinfaust
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Temple City
Posts: 3,628
Re: Someone say Gulstrand???

It is slightly more then a regular Gulstrand mod, and close to the improved version.

Last time I did it. It worked pretty well.

The 2nd part of the Gulstrand mod is moving the Upper a arm back will be accomplished by moving the lower arm forward. As per the typical C10 way.

If not there is not mix up a grinder can't fix up.
Ziegelsteinfaust is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2022, 04:13 AM   #4
theastronaut
Registered User
 
theastronaut's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Anderson SC
Posts: 3,901
Re: Someone say Gulstrand???

Why not just add a taller upper ball joint for the same effect?

With 1" narrowed arms (quicker angle change for more camber gain) and .50" taller upper ball joints my C10 had -1.6 degrees gain per inch of travel compared to -.86 per inch stock. You also gain camber when turning with a lot of caster so you may want to map out exactly how much camber gain you're getting to see if you actually need that much.
theastronaut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2022, 10:09 AM   #5
Ziegelsteinfaust
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Temple City
Posts: 3,628
Re: Someone say Gulstrand???

Quote:
Originally Posted by theastronaut View Post
Why not just add a taller upper ball joint for the same effect?

With 1" narrowed arms (quicker angle change for more camber gain) and .50" taller upper ball joints my C10 had -1.6 degrees gain per inch of travel compared to -.86 per inch stock. You also gain camber when turning with a lot of caster so you may want to map out exactly how much camber gain you're getting to see if you actually need that much.
Mostly being cheap, and I love welding to get my mind off of Life's B.S.

As for the mod. I think of it as the icing on the cake of the traditional mod of moving the lower A arm forward. Needed no, but adds a little bit of confidence to the end off tire grip or your limits. What ever happens first.

I want to learn how to measure suspension gains one day. My uncle gave me a old kit he had for rebuilding rear ends. Which has the guage to measure the run out is it?

Plus I have another C20 crossmember I will mod, rebuild, and store for my future square body Suburban or crew cab. I need a matching pair. Come to think of it. I like pairs of other things too.
Ziegelsteinfaust is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Copyright 1997-2022 67-72chevytrucks.com